Я очень люблю бренд Selfmade и хочу поделиться с вами новостью, что ребята запустили свое приложение! и можно 1000 бонусов получить, а я как раз скоро туда на осеннюю красоту… 🍁🍂 https://t.me/selfmaderussiabrand/12341
❤4

Channel
@sharovashare
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,538subscribers
-84 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001153462325 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sharovashare |
| Description | О стиле и жизни. Санкт-Петербург основной Канал MAX 📌 https://max.ru/sharovashare Сотрудничество личные блоги/мероприятия/рестораны @lidiya_sharo ❗️Бренды @rufa_abubikerova В перечне РКН https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/673a4853340096358ba9f0d2 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sharovashare |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 30,538 | -46 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 30,584 | -36 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 30,620 | -24 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 30,644 | -11 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 30,655 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 30,671 | +28 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 30,643 | -18 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 30,661 | +16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 30,645 | +23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 30,622 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:39 | 30,622 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (4 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 109,480 |
| Reactions total | 2,024 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 01:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,024 reactions across 26 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,042 | 51.5% | |
| 💅 | 362 | 17.9% | |
| 🔥 | 267 | 13.2% | |
| 🥰 | 79 | 3.90% | |
| ⚡ | 73 | 3.61% | |
| custom 5431866025677177573 | 41 | 2.03% | |
| 👌 | 39 | 1.93% | |
| custom 5415918185041907291 | 30 | 1.48% | |
| ✍ | 18 | 0.889% | |
| custom 5424991393649012623 | 17 | 0.84% | |
| custom 5397993452564663427 | 14 | 0.692% | |
| custom 5418305830376187343 | 7 | 0.346% | |
| custom 5424767501298839529 | 7 | 0.346% | |
| custom 5416129244029792125 | 5 | 0.247% | |
| custom 5418065415286828698 | 5 | 0.247% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 0.247% | |
| custom 5425148061171070025 | 4 | 0.198% | |
| custom 5424955311628759581 | 3 | 0.148% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.148% | |
| custom 5424917378477601382 | 2 | 0.099% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.049% |
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,024reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я очень люблю бренд Selfmade и хочу поделиться с вами новостью, что ребята запустили свое приложение! и можно 1000 бонусов получить, а я как раз скоро туда на осеннюю красоту… 🍁🍂 https://t.me/selfmaderussiabrand/12341
❤4
благодарю вас за комплименты моей новой прическе! 🧡 Очень приятно) укладывалась в салоне сегодня, удачно получилось, у самой пока не получается
🔥58custom 543186602567717757341❤29
Как это красиво, девочки! 💍 Украшения от Jewlia
❤72custom 542499139364901262317👌6
примерила некоторые новинки в LIME я пока к оранжевому очень очень осторожно, особенно в «площади» цвета. Возможно, частично что-то приобрету, но пока больше нет, чем да Очень красивые черничные оттенки, тренчи длинные в 4-х цветах, что тоже классно, пока все, бывает коллекция цепляет от и до, в этот раз нет. Как вы к оранжевому цвету относитесь? 🧡🏵️🍑
❤25🔥13
Про здоровье и внимание к себе в этом посте: у меня сейчас стало меньше работы, по сравнению с первым полугодием и я так и хотела, потому что пора уделить время здоровью, потому что на каких запасах я живу - я не представляю. Ферритин у меня 4 😅 Сейчас подключила: комплексные занятия осанкой офлайн + массаж сразу, в понедельник сдаю кровь и дальше к терапевту. В марте я сдала ДНК-тест 🧬 от My Genetics тест (вот ту…
❤25
Вопрос! Кто-нибудь сталкивался с сильным и постоянным раздражением? Длительный период. Жутко все бесит. Я уже не могу, разбираюсь и с ментальной стороны и с поисков дефицитов в организме, вдруг у вас есть опыт 😡🥹 А о хорошем: надо успеть еще покататься на катере в Петербурге! катер @katergo_spb на мне тренч 12storeez туфли Эконика очки Gresso
❤33✍8🔥7custom 54251480611710700254🐳2🕊1
Если бы у меня украли все коллекцию парфюмов и оставили только три, то это были бы: 🧊 Loewe Agua Drop — освежающий женский цветочный аромат, с нотками бергамота (мой любимый в августе!) 🧊 Jo Malone Wood Sage & Sea Salt — освежающий фужерно-водный аромат, бесповоротно мой любимый навсегда, напоминающий море каждый день 🧊 Louis Vuitton Imagination — фужерно-цитрусовый мужской аромат, да да, мужской, но услышав этот …
❤34🔥4
Детали ZARINA :) примерила ботильоны, замшевые при удобные! очень понравились вельветовые брюки в сочетании с рубашкой, что скажете? В комментариях скинула еще пару фото :)
❤58🔥11custom 54183058303761873437✍2👌2
Готовлюсь к шопингу завтра и зашла в ZARINA, а там появилась обувь! очень достойно, скажу вам! Примерить не успела, но видела у Азалии обзор, завтра освобожусь и примерю точно слингбэки на танкетке! Вау 👢
❤38⚡8custom 54180654152868286985
поддержу еще раз бренд EMBERENS ❤️ Сделала подборку с Ламода, позиции которые понравились: один два три четыре пять шесть
❤26⚡5custom 54249173784776013822
Сижу сегодня на терассе и понимаю, что мерзну. Воздух уже осенний Напоминаю, что у меня есть промик к бренду Aim clo ❤️ https://t.me/sharovashare/10471
❤14👌9
Впереди пора осенних шопингов и я уже отсматриваю активно коллекции. Что понравилось у бренда «Снежная Королева»: 🧊 выбор пальто по фасону и цвету: стильный воротник, нужная длина, правильные оттенки серого, красного и коричневого 🧊 утепленные бомберы и куртки, для спортивного стиля или поездок за город 🧊обувь! Загляденье, все модели так же представлены у бренда, подходят для начала осени 🧊еще сумки! Вот на втором …
❤35⚡11custom 54247675012988395297
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @sharovashare. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@sharovashare edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 476,402 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“развивая стиль | Лидия Шаро” (@sharovashare), 30,538 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sharovashare.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.