Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Стилист для простых смертных

Channel

Стилист для простых смертных

@vavdeyukekaterina

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,490subscribers

-161 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001502628390
TypeChannel
Username@vavdeyukekaterina
DescriptionНастраиваем гардероб,тренируем хороший вкус, влюбляемся в стиль Автор канала: @ekaterinavavdeyuk Информация об услугах: https://ekaterinavavdeyuk.taplink.ws Включен в реестр РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=67873d1896de59064dd6e1d6&
CreatedBetween 1 January 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vavdeyukekaterina

Growth

33,49033,65133,570.57 August 2026 — 33,651 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,651 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,646 subscribers8 August 2026 — 33,567 subscribers9 August 2026 — 33,556 subscribers10 August 2026 — 33,549 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,542 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,532 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,508 subscribers14 August 2026 — 33,497 subscribers16 August 2026 — 33,490 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,466–33,675 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:2933,490-7
14 Aug 2026, 20:3633,497-11
13 Aug 2026, 08:2633,508-24
12 Aug 2026, 04:5733,532-10
11 Aug 2026, 07:0333,542-7
10 Aug 2026, 07:1133,549-7
9 Aug 2026, 10:3533,556-11
8 Aug 2026, 13:3433,567-79
7 Aug 2026, 11:1533,646-5
7 Aug 2026, 09:0033,651no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:5433,651first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.00%
avg views ÷ 33,490 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,010
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held34 (7 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total68,317
Reactions total2,408
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
15,800
Videos
4,220
Links
1,080

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 14s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,408 reactions across 34 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,00841.9%
🔥62726.0%
😁49620.6%
👍1174.86%
😱1034.28%
❤‍🔥411.70%
🥰70.291%
👏60.249%
👌20.083%
🎉10.042%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,408reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.94%
1 of 34 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
920
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,320
over 33 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VSb5yh5fVt17 August 20267 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC≈2,420 views49 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Эта маска постоянно уходит в солдаут. И я вообще не удивлена — у меня уже третий тюбик🤍 Это тот случай, когда вечером просто нанесла маску и легла спать, а утром кожа выглядит так, будто вчера ты была не дома, а у косметолога. Она увлажняет, восстанавливает и визуально разглаживает кожу благодаря пептидам, гиалуроновой кислоте, сквалану и маслам. Особенно люблю её летом, когда солнце, жара и кондиционеры делают с к

🔥2821

14 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC≈2,320 views101 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Рубрика «Если бы я была училкой» (я кстати из семьи учителей и моя старшая сестра - учитель начальных классов. Так что я вполне могла быть тоже педагогом✨) В школе принят деловой стиль, но это не значит скучно! Современный учитель может (и должен!) выглядеть стильно, оставаясь в рамках дресс-кода. Вот мой чек-лист к 1 сентября: 👔 Рубашки — всегда актуальные фасоны (не только мужского типа как все стилисты рекоменд

58❤‍🔥31🔥9👍3

13 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC≈2,970 views201 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Я, домашний фитнес и свекровь 😃

😁160🔥41

13 Aug 2026, 03:25 UTC≈3,170 views25 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Девочки, у меня для вас хорошая парфюмерная новость! ⚡️13 августа в Randewoo грандиозный День бренда Juliette Has A Gun — скидки до 55% на все ароматы! 🥳 Идеальный момент пополнить парфюмерный гардероб уже с перспективой на осень 🍂 Собрала для вас 3 беспроигрышных варианта на свой вкус: 1. Not A Perfume — легендарный аромат-хамелеон. В нем нет сложной пирамиды, только единственная молекула Cetalox. На коже он рас

18🔥7

12 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC≈2,940 views65 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Мы скачали STAR WALK 2, которое показывает небо в реальном времени, чтобы понимать куда смотреть. Просто наводишь телефон на небо и он показывает, где что должно находиться 😃

56👍8🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC≈2,810 views41 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

24🔥17

12 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC≈2,730 views73 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Это вы ещё не знаете, что мы сегодня в 4 утра ходили смотреть парад планет 🤭🤭🤭 Маша говорит, что мы сегодня снова пойдём 🤪 Встаю потому что знаю, что именно такие события из детства запоминаются и оставляют яркие воспоминания даже, если ничего не увидели 😅 Но падающая звезда была 👍🏻

59👍14

12 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈2,390 views55 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Ленобласть. Это в телескоп.

39👍15🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC≈2,390 views70 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Я надеюсь все в таком виде сейчас? Наблюдаем солнечное затмение. У нас в 19.45 по Калининграду будет на 80% 🥰 P.S. у меня гостит свекровь

🔥49😁192

12 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC≈2,710 views56 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

✨ Моя рекомендация — лаконичность и изящество. Что предлагаю взамен? · Две аккуратные косички (классические, французские, «рыбий хвост» — что умеете). · Два хвостика на макушке или пониже — с тонкими лентами или мини-бантиками в цвет формы. · Пучки (высокие или низкие) — смотрятся очень свежо и держатся весь день. · Распущенные волосы с укладкой — например, красивые крупные кудри, собранные с боков невидимками или

38👍12🔥6

12 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC≈2,620 views51 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие мамы, папы, бабушки и все, кто готовит девочек к 1 сентября! Сегодня хочу честно поговорить о школьных причёсках. 🎀 Да, я знаю: огромные банты — это традиция, память о нашем детстве, и для многих они до сих пор символ праздника. Если вы искренне любите этот образ — носите, я не против! Но как стилист я вижу, что пышные, громоздкие банты всё чаще выглядят неактуально. Они перегружают голову, отвлекают от лиц

🔥428🎉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @vavdeyukekaterina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Раздетый стилист Лена Червова
@elennne_style · 102,296
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Стилист для простых смертных” (@vavdeyukekaterina), 33,490 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vavdeyukekaterina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.