Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NE.VASHА.NATASHA

Channel

NE.VASHА.NATASHA

@ne_vasha_natasha_WB

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

102,433subscribers

-1,908 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001667239624
TypeChannel
Username@ne_vasha_natasha_WB
Description💣ШОПОГОЛИК НА WILDBERRIES💣 WB-обзоры, полезности, лайф и просто девчачьи поболтушки. Рекламный менеджер📲 TG: @menedzherbloggeranevashanatasha и MAX: +7 952 243-61-76 Админ ОНЛАЙН-ЖУРНАЛА👩🏽‍💻 TG: @neVASH_admin и МАХ: +7 912 558-42-47
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ne_vasha_natasha_WB

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

102,433104,341103,3877 August 2026 — 104,341 subscribers7 August 2026 — 104,341 subscribers7 August 2026 — 104,320 subscribers8 August 2026 — 104,281 subscribers9 August 2026 — 104,229 subscribers10 August 2026 — 104,160 subscribers11 August 2026 — 104,091 subscribers13 August 2026 — 104,054 subscribers14 August 2026 — 103,992 subscribers15 August 2026 — 103,872 subscribers16 August 2026 — 103,792 subscribers17 August 2026 — 103,740 subscribers18 August 2026 — 103,687 subscribers19 August 2026 — 103,652 subscribers20 August 2026 — 103,620 subscribers22 August 2026 — 103,554 subscribers24 August 2026 — 103,442 subscribers25 August 2026 — 103,382 subscribers26 August 2026 — 103,357 subscribers27 August 2026 — 103,329 subscribers28 August 2026 — 103,307 subscribers29 August 2026 — 103,302 subscribers30 August 2026 — 103,270 subscribers31 August 2026 — 103,256 subscribers1 September 2026 — 103,220 subscribers2 September 2026 — 103,168 subscribers3 September 2026 — 103,068 subscribers6 September 2026 — 102,966 subscribers9 September 2026 — 102,760 subscribers12 September 2026 — 102,601 subscribers13 September 2026 — 102,538 subscribers15 September 2026 — 102,505 subscribers17 September 2026 — 102,433 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -1,908. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 102,147–104,627 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 14:41102,433-72
15 Sept 2026, 15:41102,505-33
13 Sept 2026, 20:59102,538-63
12 Sept 2026, 05:21102,601-159
9 Sept 2026, 19:36102,760-206
6 Sept 2026, 08:59102,966-102
3 Sept 2026, 23:16103,068-100
2 Sept 2026, 13:33103,168-52
1 Sept 2026, 10:47103,220-36
31 Aug 2026, 08:26103,256-14
30 Aug 2026, 05:26103,270-32
29 Aug 2026, 06:05103,302-5
28 Aug 2026, 07:34103,307-22
27 Aug 2026, 04:17103,329-28
26 Aug 2026, 03:47103,357-25
25 Aug 2026, 04:33103,382-60
24 Aug 2026, 02:02103,442-112
22 Aug 2026, 06:26103,554-66
20 Aug 2026, 19:02103,620-32
19 Aug 2026, 15:27103,652first reading

Engagement

127 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 102,433 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,300
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.859%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 127 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held127 (31 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total889,720
Reactions total7,642
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 22:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈14,400
Videos
≈2,280
Links
≈4,880

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
19m 59s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 39 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

14,608 reactions across 127 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9,03461.8%
🔥2,01913.8%
😁1,2788.75%
👍8035.50%
🥰5033.44%
💔3442.35%
❤‍🔥2831.94%
👏1230.842%
🤩840.575%
⚡570.39%
🎉230.157%
🍾220.151%
💯150.103%
🕊140.096%
🍓60.041%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 127 of the 127 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,608 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
21.3%
27 of 127 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
27
posts carrying an erid · 25 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
14,400
over 27 measured posts
Median views · rest
13,500
over 100 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqviM4Ry218 August 202618 August 2026
2Vtzqx8DGmZ23 September 20263 September 2026
2VtzquYC1Wj124 August 202624 August 2026
2VtzqueJJgt110 September 202610 September 2026
2VtzquiU8MS18 September 20268 September 2026
2VtzqupbZoy120 August 202620 August 2026
2VtzqvBbsNC124 September 202624 September 2026
2VtzqvQbb6T124 August 202624 August 2026
2VtzqvfaWvf120 August 202620 August 2026
2VtzqvnqQKd124 August 202624 August 2026
2Vtzqvs8aNg112 September 202612 September 2026
2Vtzqw5DL6w130 August 202630 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 13 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.

Measured over the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 16:37 UTC≈5,070 views34 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

ВЕЧЕР ДОБРЫЙ🤌🏽 Выхожу хвастаться😁🎁 Я же вчера дома вслух обсуждала, что мне надо, и мой фей оперативно организовал💁🏼‍♀️ Сразу скажу: заказывал не на ВБ. Вообще не поняла про работу только с WI-FI🙄 Наушники - просто доп.плюшка, к той Алисе, которая уже живёт у Вас в телефоне, если Вы на Яндексе. И работают они полноценно как от WI-FI, так и от мобильной сети. У Вас же Алиса в поисковике работает от мобильной сети??…

❤34

Signed Ne.Vasha.Natasha

25 Sept 2026, 22:06 UTC≈8,800 views31 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Так, девочки, срочный сбор на обсуждения и рецензии🗣️ Кажется, мне надо👀

🔥28❤3

Signed Ne.Vasha.Natasha

25 Sept 2026, 11:13 UTC≈10,600 views188 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Не, ну Вы это вообще видели…👀 Я не говорила, что у меня тренер-абьюзер?? Теперь Вы в курсе💁🏼‍♀️ На самом деле, я просто месяц не хожу на тренировки, а он просто соскучился🤣 Но заговор на понос никто не отменял💩

😁158❤17🍓6⚡4❤‍🔥2🍾1

Signed Ne.Vasha.Natasha

24 Sept 2026, 15:52 UTC≈11,700 views45 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqxL9AX6Photo

▪️КОЛЬЕ-КУБИКИ ▪️КОЛЬЕ-СОТУАР Эта «двойка» - моё личное открытие и фавориты Стеши из всего обзора😍 Очень классно смотрятся вместе и, не менее круто, стилизуются по отдельности. ▪️СЕРЬГИ Акцентный минимализм. Слышали про такое??😅 Если нет, то он выглядит именно так, как они. Реклама. ИП Рябов И. Ю. ИНН 370259757707 Erid: 2VtzqxL9AX6

❤26❤‍🔥9🔥6👍4

Signed Ne.Vasha.Natasha

24 Sept 2026, 15:50 UTC≈10,700 views41 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqvBbsNCPhoto

Ну что, погнали разбираться💎 ▪️ЦЕПЬ С КАМНЕМ Брутально, с характером и просто ВАУ🔥 Идеально подошла к кольцу, которое уже было у меня в арсенале. Хотя, все украшения бренда прекрасно сочетаются между собой - за это я их и люблю. ▪️КОЛЬЦО С КАМНЕМ + СЕТ С КАМНЯМИ Вот их как раз мне прислали повторно😁 Я сама заказывала всю тройку ещё под года назад. ▪️КОЛЬЦО С СЕРДЦЕМ А вот это новиночка в моём арсенале. Забираем…

❤28👍8🔥3❤‍🔥2

Signed Ne.Vasha.Natasha

24 Sept 2026, 15:43 UTC≈10,400 views49 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

А теперь к главному на сегодня🛍️ Честно скажу, если бренд ещё раз придёт к нам на обзор, я уже не буду знать, что брать🙈 Потому что в этот раз были закрыты абсолютно все мои хотелки из отложенного и случились даже повторы - эти роскошные кольца, например, я давно заказала сама😅 Ну если только ожидаются новиночки…💅🏽

❤37🤩5❤‍🔥4🔥3

Signed Ne.Vasha.Natasha

24 Sept 2026, 12:39 UTC≈10,900 views74 reactionsread 26 September 2026

80% времени, будучи мамой школьницы, владельцем уже двух шерстяных детей, фрилансером, который редко выбирается в люди и практически всегда двигается на райончике, я выбираю расслабленные комфортные, но стильные образы на базе спортивных костюмов, джоггеров и джинс. А если говорить про какие-то вылазки, то, скорее, отдам предпочтение вот такому дерзкому аутфиту, нежели платьям, каблукам или обтягончику. Это вообще вс…

❤65⚡8😁1

Signed Ne.Vasha.Natasha

24 Sept 2026, 12:39 UTC≈11,700 views68 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

ДЕНЬ ДОБРЫЙ🖤 Собралась, значит, смотрю на себя в зеркало и вспоминаю, как пару месяцев назад под постом с опросом про ПУТЕВОДИТЕЛЬ, где я спрашивала девочек «Поделитесь, почему конкретно Вы до сих пор не оформили подписку??», прилетел комментарий «У Вас слишком женственные образы и гардероб, я там ничего для себя не найду». Тем временем, мой любимый стилёк💁🏼‍♀️ Который всегда был таким. И я реально максимально ред…

❤37❤‍🔥19⚡5🔥3🤩2👍1😁1

Signed Ne.Vasha.Natasha

23 Sept 2026, 20:10 UTC≈13,500 views161 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

Когда только в 22:00 поняла, что все всё доели и ребенку завтра нечего собрать на обед в школу…🗿 Еле сдержалась, чтобы не опробовать🤣

❤102🔥54👏5

Signed Ne.Vasha.Natasha

23 Sept 2026, 16:17 UTC≈14,200 views70 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Так, давно не было ценных рекомендаций🍿 А это как раз она. Ценная. Прям очень хорошо. Посмотрите. Прям надо. Душевно максимально🤌🏽 Смотрим на KION.

❤55😁13❤‍🔥2

Signed Ne.Vasha.Natasha

23 Sept 2026, 09:46 UTC≈14,400 views149 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

У нас тут новая развлекуха💩 Стешик увидела где-то обзор и нашла на ВБ, а Сенечке очень зашло😁

😁112❤37

Signed Ne.Vasha.Natasha

22 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC≈15,500 views100 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqwL6CH2Photo

Я люблю всех этих «плюшиков» и это, можно сказать, один из моих фетишев холодного сезона🧸 Девочковый вайб и максимальный уют в сочетании с простым базовым кроем и адекватной ценой в нынешних реалиях🤌🏽 И, кстати, неоднократно нами проверенный бренд🔝 РОЗОВЫЙ // 945973824 БЕЛЫЙ // 945999067 По итогу, я за РОЗОВЫЙ. Белый для многих, наверное, будет универсальней, но белая база у меня уже есть - недавно делилась с де…

❤72🔥15🥰6🤩4👍3

Signed Ne.Vasha.Natasha

Showing the 12 most recent of 127 posts we hold for @ne_vasha_natasha_WB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ne_vasha_natasha_WB edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
22 September 2026
Most recent edit
22 September 2026

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

MAKSSKATTE🌙
@mmaksskatte · 17,721
#1
Staslaska
@staslaska · 7,839
#2
Maryschoice
@nahodkiza300 · 37,543
#3
LEONTEVA MARIIA 💖
@leontevamariya_tg · 106,410
#4
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,668,820
#5
farbeystefany
@farbeystefany · 25,254
#7
Жидковские посиделки
@zhidkovskiy_talk · 575,554
#8
Ксения Бородина
@borodylia0803 · 911,782
#9
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 354,527
#10
Vrednayamoda / Вредная Мода
@vrednayamoda · 188,094
#11
by TAISIYA
@byTAISIYA · 25,020
#12
Администрация Аншлага
@klaragavrilovnanews · 157,158
#13
джусик и ее друзья
@po1yusik · 16,193
#14
KAKDELA
@mariakakdela · 96,384
#15
MELTON
@meltonsofya · 62,920
#16
С любовью, Ариша
@missarrriii · 7,174
#17
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 4,076,789
#18
Мурчание Эли
@aiwaska9 · 4,163
#19
eat.sleep.wear.
@eatsleepwear · 88,116
#20
Даша Козловская
@dashakozlouskayatg · 135,959
#21
Elena Bogdanovich
@bogdanovich_elena · 118,358
#22
IdaGalich
@GALICH_onok · 285,492
#23
Maisto
@igormaisto · 103,538
#24
evkasup
@evkasup13 · 103,801
#25
NADIN NADIN
@NADIN_NADINEE · 251,413
#26
селф-лав club 🫶🏼
@tutselflove · 13,256
#27
Только никому...
@spletni_tg · 187,952
#28
Super.ru
@SuperRu · 196,482
#29
Sasha Burimova
@burimovasasha · 81,553
#30
твоя подруга MALEKSA
@maleksa_style · 4,903
#31
Канал о стиле Тани Компаненко
@kompanenkotanya · 57,521
#32
TSARSKAYA.K 🌙 | Екатерина Царская
@ktsarskaya · 86,152
#33
PERVICERY
@briusvictoria · 201,674
#34
ALINA A.🪐🤍
@byalllina · 21,880
#35
PILETSKAYA
@piletskayabeauty · 97,153
#36
stylist.irina_
@stylist_irina13 · 45,957
#37
UMKA
@umkatgk · 52,056
#38
Anya Kulinchenko
@kuliinchenko · 6,143
#39
Проект Шмеля - Катя Конасова
@proektshmel · 123,619
#40
Karina Kasparyants
@karinaVIP · 171,988
#41
Роскошь бутиков
@zhidkovskiy_beauty · 151,752
#42
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 157,220
#43
Mash
@mash · 3,110,586
#44
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,622,630
#45
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,178,521
#46
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,974,402
#47
москоутиндер
@moscowtinderr · 740,982
#48
развивая стиль | Лидия Шаро
@sharovashare · 30,176
#49
SHOT
@shot_shot · 1,265,657
#50
KOSTI
@kosti · 560,192
#51
Yuppi_tours
@yuppi_turs · 3,533
#52
MMARGO
@mmargosavchuk · 119,670
#53
YOBAJUR
@yobajur · 187,944
#54
Katya Golden
@katya_golden · 108,306
#55
FEMALE MEMES
@femalememes · 407,543
#56
Осторожно, Москва
@ostorozhno_moskva · 391,203
#57
Ольга Гогаладзе
@profinansy · 576,732
#58
Mash на Мойке
@mashmoyka · 342,028
#59

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ДАШУЛИК НА СВЯЗИ
@chikileva00 · 78,765
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NE.VASHА.NATASHA” (@ne_vasha_natasha_WB), 102,433 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ne_vasha_natasha_WB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.