По поводу сотрудничества — только на почту: [email protected]
Регистрация в перечне РКН:
https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6736ef2a15601c23cb2889ff®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -488. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,600–40,234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 00:00
39,673
-20
16 Sept 2026, 14:00
39,693
-23
14 Sept 2026, 21:42
39,716
-32
13 Sept 2026, 06:58
39,748
-24
11 Sept 2026, 06:18
39,772
-18
8 Sept 2026, 09:15
39,790
-20
5 Sept 2026, 03:02
39,810
-17
3 Sept 2026, 09:53
39,827
-33
2 Sept 2026, 02:27
39,860
-34
1 Sept 2026, 03:54
39,894
-25
31 Aug 2026, 06:11
39,919
+3
30 Aug 2026, 06:42
39,916
-13
29 Aug 2026, 03:45
39,929
-15
28 Aug 2026, 05:17
39,944
-20
27 Aug 2026, 06:35
39,964
-23
26 Aug 2026, 07:53
39,987
-20
25 Aug 2026, 04:53
40,007
-2
23 Aug 2026, 22:39
40,009
-41
22 Aug 2026, 04:47
40,050
+4
20 Aug 2026, 20:34
40,046
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 39,673 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,660
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
38 (31 July 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
190,560
Reactions total
8,924
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 23:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,840
Videos
≈298
Links
≈537
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 33s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17,380 reactions across 38 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
11,807
67.9%
❤🔥
1,754
10.1%
🔥
1,508
8.68%
😍
1,281
7.37%
👍
550
3.16%
🥰
171
0.984%
💔
118
0.679%
👌
96
0.552%
😭
56
0.322%
👏
39
0.224%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,380 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 38 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @liza_rudkevich. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
НОВЫЙ ВЛОГ НА КАНАЛЕ 🖤
Думаю, что именно этот влог объяснит, почему я так долго ничего не выкладывала на YouTube. Буду возвращаться потихоньку!
Все о нашем незапланированном переезде, причинах и в целом о последних событиях
Смотреть можно тут
Бассейн из моей карты желаний на 2026 год!
Каждый раз не верю, что сбылось. Но к каждому желанию я шла годами. Поэтому сейчас что-то может исполнятся словно по волшебству, но так только кажется
📍отель The Lana Dudai
Не знаю, как это произошло, но еще вначале весны именно такую кожу я внедрила в новую коллекцию Ruél и начала с модели Office. Тогда ее немного все боялись, но я почему-то была уверена, что надо пробовать.
Этот внутренний голос, действительно удивительный, меня не подвел. Либо это удача, либо насмотренность и опыт работы. Пока не знаю :)
Но как только упал первый желтый листок с дерева, все сумки в этом материале з…
Провела начало осени в теплом месте — неожиданно улетели в Дубай 🩵
Лето было не идеальным, поэтому очень рада была отдохнуть и продлить лето хоть ненадолго. Отдыхали в Атлантис the palm — один из самых известных отелей Дубая, открыт еще в 2008 году и стал, можно сказать, символом города благодаря своей грандиозной архитектуре в виде дворца с восточной аркой.
На территории есть буквально все: от магазинов до почти 5…
Открываю эту осень тремя образами из новой коллекции SELA 🤎🍂
У бренда в премиальной коллекции просто шикарные изделия из кожи: жакет укороченый и куртка рабочего из натуральной карамельной замши. Их сразу захотелось вписать в гардероб, так что обязательно обратите внимание!
Дополнила образы базовым денимом, рубашкой, лонгсливом — все из https://t.me/sela_brand.
Какой образ больше понравился?
Пришло время!
Вдохновилась новым пространством idol и собрала аутфиты с осенним настроением, чтобы не сильно грустить об уходящем лете, всегда спасаюсь классными образами на предстоящие +10
Очень понравилась коллекция, много качественных вещей вне времени, натуральных материалов, кожи и идеального кроя
Ну и сам магазин на Большой Конюшенной в Санкт-Петербурге очень стильный — место, которое хочется разглядывать
Liu Jo x Liza Rudkevich
Специально для итальянского бренда Liu Jo я подготовила фэшн-гид! В нем собрала 6 образов из новой коллекции с моими фаворитами и поделилась, как стилизовала бы их сама.
Один из образов оставляю здесь — кажется, это отличный вариант для начала осени и очередное доказательство моей любви к дениму :)
Еще пять стилизаций с моими комментариями и любимыми приемами уже ждут вас в полном гиде!
За…
❤280👍44😍38🔥22🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @liza_rudkevich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
💃🏼 / Корпорация женщин @gizhevskayae · 27,442 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 September 2026
pollinasha🍒 @pollinasha_reserve · 53,533 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 5 September 2026
aim_clo @aimclo_telegram · 37,829 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
juliadamon @juliadamonn · 32,541 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 September 2026
with yereko @withyereko · 41,105 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 3 September 2026
Katya Golden @katya_golden · 108,306 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
полли зиновьева @hellopolya · 26,531 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 September 2026
Marianna Eliseeva @mariannaeliseeva · 95,210 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
@anyaru @yanyaru · 57,464 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 6 September 2026
EKATERINA VALUEVA @valueva_ekaterina · 27,254 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
МАША РАССКАЖЕТ @gogolmarie · 28,219 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
МАЛЫШКА ПО @polyaam · 28,295 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 9 September 2026
kriv.da, что нового❓ @dari_krivda · 29,671 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Galya_kononova @galya_stylist · 26,602 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 September 2026
Katie’s Notes @katienotes · 30,793 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
ЛУЧСОЛНЦА ☼ @lychsolntsa · 24,508 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 September 2026
KATARÍNA @katarinaheey · 34,082 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 5 September 2026
Elena Bogdanovich @bogdanovich_elena · 118,711 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
dima ermuzevich @dima_ermuzevich · 27,654 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 September 2026
sosomak @sosomakinst · 22,743 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 20 September 2026
китти в ауте @katukssaaa · 81,695 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 19 August 2026
данич крив @dankakriv · 53,731 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 24 August 2026
КАРИНА НИГАЙ @nigaykarina · 95,277 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 August 2026
LIMÉ @limestorecom · 93,482 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лиза Рудкевич” (@liza_rudkevich), 39,673 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liza_rudkevich.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.