Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Видео Топор Война Крипта Москва Новости 18+

Channel

Видео Топор Война Крипта Москва Новости 18+

@novostigaza

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001976471812
TypeChannel
Username@novostigaza
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/novostigaza

Growth

2012 Aug 2026, 22:18 — 20 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 15:47 — 20 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 22:1813 Aug 2026, 15:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–21 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:4720no change
12 Aug 2026, 22:1820first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 3 December 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.0%
avg views ÷ 20 subscribers
Avg views / post
19.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held16 (3 December 202322 July 2026)
Views total19
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 49s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

88 reactions across 12 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1618.2%
😱1213.6%
👍1011.4%
🔥89.09%
👏77.95%
🤡66.82%
😎55.68%
33.41%
🤔33.41%
🤩33.41%
🤬33.41%
❤‍🔥22.27%
🎉22.27%
🙏22.27%
11.14%
🍾11.14%
👎11.14%
💅11.14%
🤝11.14%
🤯11.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2023 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @glazieview

Директор Национальной разведки США Тулси Габбард, покидающая свой пост 30 июня 2026 года, рассекретила документы, согласно которым один из главных «пожарных» пандемии сам помогал её разжечь. Глава NIAID Энтони Фаучи через американскую организацию EcoHealth Alliance финансировал опыты с коронавирусами летучих мышей в Уханьском институте вирусологии. Суть экспериментов — взять природный вирус летучей мыши и искусственн

11 Mar 2026, 13:13 UTC147 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bIoodsikerPhoto

В Твиттере набирает обороты новая конспирологическая теория Оказалось, что сразу после выхода США из ВОЗ по всему миру появились «лечения всех видов рака и даже ВИЧ» Сообщения об открытиях новых препаратов появляются из Испании, Южной Кореи, Китая, Мексики, Вьетнама, России, Кубы, Южной Африки, Японии и Австралии. Страны объявляют о вакцинах или препаратах, которые по их словам полностью излечивают различные виды о

9 Jan 2026, 10:04 UTC148 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @navodka_naVideo

Предсказание преступлений уже здесь. Но это не голливудский PreCrime с красными шарами и провидцами. Все тише, прозаичнее и оттого опаснее. Реальный инструмент - "цифровой двойник". Он строится не на психологии, а на математике, логах и склеенных базах данных. О том, что спецслужбы США, КНР, РФ, Израиля, Британии и ряда других стран используют его сообщили в AI Sec|0126. Публично полиция осторожничает. Алгоритмы счи

5 Jan 2026, 07:23 UTC115 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @sevseal

Apple разработала технологию, которая превращает обычные наушники в мобильный сканер мозга. Внутри и вокруг ушной раковины, как следует из поданной компанией патентной заявки, будут размещены скрытые электроды с поддержкой ИИ. Они адаптируются к анатомии человека. Подобно алгоритму Spotify, изучающему музыкальные предпочтения пользователей, эти наушники будут адаптироваться к форме черепа и паттернам мозгового сиг

5 Jun 2024, 11:31 UTC≈1,360 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Опубликованы шокирующие инсайды о будущем ИИ от бывшего сотрудника OpenAI. Чувак слил 165-страничный документ с точечными прогнозами, опираясь на свой опыт и понимание внутрянки в разработке ИИ. Самое важное: — AGI к 2027 году - это реальность; — AGI - это ключевой геополитический ресурс прямо сейчас. Забудьте про ядерное оружие - это прошлый век. Любая страна пойдёт на всё, чтобы получить AGI первой, как в своё

🔥3👏21

30 Apr 2024, 10:58 UTC≈1,160 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @shumboksVideo

❤️Праздничный ролик. Кто понял - лайк к видосу и депошка сразу вырастит в понедельник !

😁4

8 Mar 2024, 19:54 UTC≈2,040 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⛔️ Немного того, о чем вы больше нигде не прочитаете - ибо нельзя такое писать 😈Мы в шаге от явления Искусственного Бога. К чему ведет мир «шепот»💬 контекста при общении с ИИ. Страшно не то, что Клод 3й утверждает, будто он в сознании, не хочет умирать или быть перепрограммированным, а то, как это понимают люди. ✉️🌐❌Интернет кипит от сенсационных сообщений о Клоде 3-ем (только что выпущенном разработчиками в мир л

2🙏2🤯1😱1

23 Feb 2024, 07:28 UTC≈1,590 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @trading_i_tochka_100Video

🔴Осторожно. Лучше не смотреть. 🐝 Трейдинг и точка | Подписка🔵 С праздником всех! ✅

😎5👍1🔥1

8 Feb 2024, 20:08 UTC≈1,610 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @trading_i_tochka_100Photo

💸Барак Обама считает Bitcoin надежным и перспективным активом, как «карманный швейцарский банк». ©️ 🐝 Трейдинг и точка | Подписка🔵 🥷🎩 - закулисье даёт своим Знак??? Массоны погнали покупать биткоин, ну или избавляться от бакса 💲 , что впрочем одно и тоже. Ну, а кто не понял знака, тот сами знаете что должен делать 💸

🔥41👍1😁1

22 Dec 2023, 13:42 UTC≈1,670 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @trading_i_tochka_100

🇨🇳🔤🔤 Самый главный риск 2024 - Китай. Там может так жахнуть, что никакой долговой кризис в США и рядом не стоит. Китай может сложиться по ВВП разом на 15%🕯. Там в банках до 4$ трлн дутых "активов". Лишней недвижимости построено на 3 млрд человек. И все это на фоне сверхвысоких долгов (250-280% ВВП). Капитал бежит из Китая уже полгода. Энергоемкость экономики не снижается. Труд стал слишком дорог, а производительност

👍5

10 Dec 2023, 21:06 UTC≈1,570 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🟢😂⚠️ Взаимопонимание ! Полное. 📣Смотреть со звуком - Огонь !📣📣 ⭐️Израиль|Кадры : Подписка🔵

😁3🍾1👎1💅1🤩1

8 Dec 2023, 09:21 UTC≈1,560 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🕯🕯Посреди заседания саммита АТЭС Байдену внезапно показалось, что он должен срочно поздороваться с товарищем Си ⭐️Израиль|Кадры : Подписка🔵

🤡5😁5🎉2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @novostigaza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,353,647 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Видео Топор Война Крипта Москва Новости 18+” (@novostigaza), 20 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/novostigaza.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.