Для тех, кому важно быть умным 🤓
Блог про устройство человека 🔬
Реклама - @eesmith
Соцсети: https://taplink.cc/kekslife
Наш дейтинг: @mosdate
РКН: https://surl.lt/bfppts
Разбаны: @MyTeleGO
Created
3 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net +1,326. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 192,998–196,837 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 08:18
194,853
-584
17 Sept 2026, 05:57
195,437
-95
15 Sept 2026, 07:21
195,532
-114
13 Sept 2026, 16:15
195,646
-187
11 Sept 2026, 19:58
195,833
-236
9 Sept 2026, 10:42
196,069
-100
6 Sept 2026, 03:00
196,169
+21
4 Sept 2026, 00:19
196,148
-24
2 Sept 2026, 14:39
196,172
-95
1 Sept 2026, 14:09
196,267
-59
31 Aug 2026, 14:13
196,326
-18
30 Aug 2026, 16:08
196,344
-50
29 Aug 2026, 15:03
196,394
+34
28 Aug 2026, 11:24
196,360
+121
27 Aug 2026, 11:56
196,239
+191
26 Aug 2026, 12:48
196,048
+463
25 Aug 2026, 15:28
195,585
+80
24 Aug 2026, 17:55
195,505
+195
23 Aug 2026, 05:07
195,310
+708
21 Aug 2026, 16:03
194,602
first reading
Engagement
61 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.7%
avg views ÷ 194,853 subscribers
Avg views / post
30,600
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.647%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 61 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
61 (17 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
765,700
Reactions total
4,953
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 20:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
521
Videos
234
Links
735
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 43s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,557 reactions across 61 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5217791902023162643
13,000
95.9%
custom 5215635927224820367
557
4.11%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,557 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
212
across the posts below
Posts paid on
52
of 61 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sapiscience. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 61 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.64%
1 of 61 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
44,500
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
35,800
over 60 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VSb5x2utUi
1
4 August 2026
4 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Нюдсуббота и знакомства!
Для новоприбывших: в нюдсубботу мы собираемся в комментариях и все, начиная с меня, делимся сексуальными фото и видео (но строго по правилам, которые ниже). А если вы хотите познакомиться именно со мной - имейте в виду, я перекочевала в mDate. Девочкам особенно советую, для нас там просто рай из симпатичных пацанов :)
Ну а если вы хотите знакомиться прямо тут - тогда по старинке добавляем к…
Эээх, дорого всё-таки быть честной - 80% рекламных заявок на косметос идут в мусорку 🥲
Давайте-ка в этой связи вспомним, что из косметических ингредиентов нормально работает, а на что можно даже деньги не тратить:
Работают:
Ретинол, ниацинамид, витамин C, кислоты (АНА, ВНА, РНА), мочевина, глицерин, пантенол, гиалуронка, церамиды и солнцезащитные фильтры.
Средне работают (обычно далеко не как заявлено):
Витамин Е, …
Почему вас раздражает ИИ?
Официальное обращение ко всем, кого задолбал нейрослоп, заполонивший интернет: с вами, ребята, всё более чем нормально. И таки да, есть научное обоснование того, почему нас раздражают сгенерированные видосы (причём чем внимательнее и сообразительнее человек - тем это чувство сильнее).
Дело в том, что ваш мозг постоянно сравнивает ту картинку, которую видят глаза, со своими ожиданиями; то е…
Депрессия - это болезнь
Перманентно происходящий вокруг пиздец вынуждает говорить о важном. А так как сейчас в депрессивном или пред-депрессивном эпизоде разгуливает каждый третий, и из них половина почему-то не считает нужным обращаться за помощью, приходится повторять базу.
Вот вы когда с ангиной валяетесь или руку сломали - вы что делаете? Бинго, идёте к врачу. Так почему в случае с ангедонией (потерей удовольств…
Питьевой коллаген - работает
Да, вы не ослышались. До этого я писала пост, где говорила, что он не работает, но, так как меня никто толком не услышал и до сих пор продолжает про него спрашивать, придётся сформулировать для вас по-другому - да, питьевой коллаген работает.
Просто с одним важным но: обычная говядина будет работать ещё лучше.
Смотрите.
Коллаген - это белок. Когда вы его выпиваете, пищеварительная сист…
Есть ли связь между качеством эрекции и требованиями к внешности партнёрши
Я вот много лет доказываю, что есть, и мужская половая сила обратно коррелирует с количеством претензий к женщине - чисто по моим наблюдениям. И вот в кои-то веки мне стало не лень это проверить. Как вы думаете, какой результат обнаружился?..
Правильно.
Но нам же нужны пруфы, Билли?
Вот, например, в исследовании 2022 года приняли участие 20…
#чтопочитать
Не забываем и про нашу постоянную (хотя сейчас скорее непостоянную) рубрику.
В ней мы делимся полезными и интересными тг-каналами, начиная с меня (а вы можете продолжать в комментах). Тем более любимой телеге важна поддержка пользователей, как никогда раньше.
Итак:
Горе от ума — канал нейробиолога о том, что происходит у нас в мозге, когда мы влюбляемся, устаём, часами прокрастинируем в соцсетях (нет, …
Нюдсуббота и знакомства!
Для новоприбывших: в нюдсубботу мы собираемся в комментариях и все, начиная с меня, делимся сексуальными фото и видео (но строго по правилам, которые ниже). А если вы хотите познакомиться именно со мной - имейте в виду, я перекочевала в mDate. Девочкам особенно советую, для нас там просто рай из симпатичных пацанов :)
Ну а если вы хотите знакомиться прямо тут - тогда по старинке добавляем к…
Почему менять любовь на деньги - невыгодно
Любовь, межпрочим, измерима, по крайней мере, для учёных – точно. Самые интересные и важные открытия в этой области начались с исследований Гарри Харлоу, который экспериментировал над макаками-резусами довольно бесчеловечным образом. Быть точнее, он изучал развитие систем аффективных привязанностей, выясняя, как и где животные готовы менять эмоциональную связь с другой особ…
Зачем нужна растяжка
...особенно диспластикам. Так что если вы здесь в том числе из-за этого синдрома - читайте внимательно.
Чем старше я становлюсь (скоро, чай, 35 годиков стукнет), тем лучше понимаю, что нельзя выбрать один вид спорта и успокоиться; чем дальше в возраст, тем важнее и силовые тренировки, чтобы мышцы удерживали суставы, и аэробная нагрузка для выносливости, ну и нормальная подвижность тела. А если …
Всё про системные ретиноиды
Давно стоило сделать большой пост на эту тему, коли я через раз повторяю о том, что трижды курсила СР.
Вокруг них довольно много слухов, мифов и разных страшилок, потому что препарат-то действительно сильный и с рядом побочек (на самом деле далеко не таких страшных, как их рисуют). Но обо всём по порядку:
Для начала, системные ретиноиды - это действительно единственная возможность избави…
Нюдсуббота и знакомства!
Посмотрите, какие роскошные сорочку и халат подарили мне Ayris Silk 😍
Вот уж правда - одежда иногда эротичнее, чем её отсутствие!
Для новоприбывших: в нюдсубботу мы собираемся в комментариях и все, начиная с меня, делимся сексуальными фото и видео (но строго по правилам, которые ниже). А если вы хотите познакомиться именно со мной - имейте в виду, я перекочевала в mDate. Девочкам особенно с…
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @sapiscience. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@sapiscience edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Осовцов говорит @osovtsovgovorit · 78,428 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
Тёмная комната | Эриксон @erik_hard · 44,734 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
Любовник Голубев @lovergolubev · 112,484 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
femFM✨🏰✨ @femFM_by_iliastahov · 26,419 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 22 September 2026
Выйди и зайди нормально @comein_okay · 27,935 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 September 2026
москоутиндер @moscowtinderr · 740,982 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026
Бачинская @bachinskaya_oxana · 69,728 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Дмитрий Гухман | Сексология @idemvmeste_dimagukhman · 70,001 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
НЕДЕТСКИЙ АНГЛИЙСКИЙ @unchildish_english · 41,932 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Горд🏴☠️ @oskolkiblok · 58,807 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
мерзкие женщины @merzkiej · 33,275 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
Тренер Артём @trener_artem · 56,518 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Alena.Mad @alena_mad0 · 66,520 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Метаморфоза @Max_anti_trainer · 185,499 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
Ключи завесы @mayamakarowa · 20,625 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 September 2026
Путь к наслаждению😈 @secretss_school · 27,386 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 10 September 2026
INNA DE ALMEIDA @inna_de_almeida · 61,358 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
Кирилл Гавриличев @gavrilichevkirill · 22,848 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наука о сапиенсах” (@sapiscience), 194,853 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sapiscience.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.