2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 320–322 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 07:31
321
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:37
321
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 11 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
17
Videos
2
Links
6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
134 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5276361245757297547
113
84.3%
custom 5395774792718632920
21
15.7%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 28 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
9.09%
1 of 11 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,530
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,130
over 10 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VfnxxGBg2m
1
28 October 2025
28 October 2025
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 28 October 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
😂 Директор по маркетингу VK Знакомств на полном серьёзе решил сравнить трафик грубо говоря с одного моего канала @moscowach, где иногда выходит реклама MosDate, с бесконечным трафиком, который дает VK — #1 социальная сеть в России с MAU 90+ млн пользователей.
При том, что VK знакомства существуют около 4 лет, а MosDate 3 месяца.
И при том, что MosDate ограничен лишь аудиторией из Москвы и работает пока только в Tel…
Добавили вот такие классные карточки при первом заходе в диалоги.
Нам важно, чтобы пользователи уважали личные границы и вели диалоги приятно для собеседника.
У нас почти нет жалоб на мошенничество (все благодаря строгой модерации), но несмотря на это мы продолжаем работать над безопасностью и оповещаем пользователей о том, что необходимо быть внимательными.
🐏 Рекомендуем запустить наше классное приложение для знакомств MosDate со строгой ручной модерацией.
Функции, которые там уже есть и будут, строятся вокруг интересов москвичей. Например, поиск партнёра по «любимым местам» в Москве или по ближайшему метро.
Красивый дизайн — все работает плавно и быстро, притом прямо в телеграм. Это гораздо удобнее отдельного приложения.
Просто открываете @MosDate → нажимаете «Запус…
Пока все обсуждают Мосдейт, новую приложуху для знакомств, расскажу вам кулстори:
Я же там, естественно, побежала регистрироваться. Ну потому что формат знакомств а-ля Тон дейтинг, где сидят молодые и красивые (а не папики с эскортницами, как в 88, или вообще все подряд, как в Пьюре и Твинби) - ну это прям моё. Но в гадском Тоне мужиков человек 15 на всю Москву, а подписка стоит ощутимых денег. А тут вроде как и нар…
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ogadate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Что там с MosDate?” (@ogadate), 321 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ogadate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
