Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,898–4,969 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 21:57
4,947
-9
14 Sept 2026, 13:41
4,956
+2
10 Sept 2026, 18:41
4,954
+48
5 Sept 2026, 07:01
4,906
-8
1 Sept 2026, 08:36
4,914
-12
29 Aug 2026, 08:43
4,926
-9
26 Aug 2026, 00:17
4,935
+2
22 Aug 2026, 14:08
4,933
-4
19 Aug 2026, 06:46
4,937
-7
16 Aug 2026, 16:57
4,944
-8
12 Aug 2026, 16:14
4,952
-5
10 Aug 2026, 00:29
4,957
-2
6 Aug 2026, 17:30
4,959
-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:21
4,961
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 11s
Average length
1m 36s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
269 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
175
65.1%
😢
37
13.8%
👍
24
8.92%
🥰
23
8.55%
👌
6
2.23%
💔
3
1.12%
😍
1
0.372%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
••
سنرى بعد قليل المنشورات التي تظهر مع كل زلزال فتقول: "إن لم تشعر بالزلزال فاحمد الله لأن الله رضي عنك فلم يعرضك للعذاب والرعب" ثم يقرن منشوره بأقوام أهلكهم الله بالصيحة، والصاعقة .. إلخ :)
والرد في عُجالة: أن الأمر لا علاقة له بما يُقال ويُكتب، فقد لا يشعر بالزلزال كافر مقيم على الكفر، ويشعر به مؤمن ناسك،
بل لا يشعر به نائم ذو نوم عميق، ويشعر به مستيقظ قائم،
لا يشعر به من يَبعد عنه بمسافة، ويحسه من أقام بمركزه و…
••
بعض الناس ابتليت في دينها بالتخبيب بين القوم، فلا تتورع عن ضبط لسانها وتوجيهاتها بين القوم بالتناوب، لتنزغ بين هذا وتفرق بين ذاك، وتحرض هذا على هذا، نسأل الله السلامة والعافية، قد يظنون أنهم في مأمن، بل تأخير العقوبة أخوف لما يُلحقه بهم من سوء العاقبة في الدنيا والآخرة والعياذ بالله، وعقوبة الدنيا لا تعفيها التوبة والاستغفار فحسب، قد يظن الكثير أن التوبة رافعة، لكن الأمر شرعاً يتغير إذا ما تعلق بحقوق العباد.
..
عقول الحدادية عقول معطوبة، لا تصلح لقراءة كتب العلم، فضلا عن كتب المتقدمين، فضلا عن المفاضلة بينهم وإقامة المحاكمة.
وصادفت أن دخلت باب الاعتقاد فأفسدت فيه ما هو معلوم مشاهَد مُنكَر عند كل عاقل.
ولو دخلت باب العربية ورأت خلاف البصريين والكوفيين وكلام بعضهم في بعض لأفسدت فسادا مماثلا.
وكذلك باب الحديث أو الفقه أو غيرها من العلوم، حتى الشعر؛ إن رأوا نقد النقاد للشعراء وانقسام المذاهب في الشعر لأقاموا على إثر ذلك حربا.
…
••
في الصحيح عن أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه قال: قال رسول الله ﷺ: «إِنَّ العَبْدَ لَيَتَكَلَّمُ بِالكَلِمَةِ مِنْ سَخَطِ اللهِ لَا يُلْقِي لَهَا بَالًا يَهْوِي بِهَا فِي جَهَنَّمَ سَبْعِينَ خَرِيفًا».
فقد أَوْجبَ الله له العذاب ولم يَعْذِرْهُ مع كونه: لم يُلْق لكلامه بالًا! أي: أنه لم يستحضِرْ قيمة قَوْلِهِ، ولا ميزَانَ كلامهِ؛ لأنهُ مُتَسَاهِلٌ في تأمل قولهِ؛ فلو تَفَكَّرَ فيهِ وتأملَهُ أدْنَى تأمُّلٍ لاتَّضَحَ له قُبْح…
••
قال ﷺ:
”أكثروا من الصلاة عليَّ ليلة الجمعة ويوم الجمعة فإن صلاتكم معروضة عليَّ.“
اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ وبَارك عَلَى نَبِيِّنَا مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلَى آلِهِ وَصَحْبِهِ أَجْمَعِينَ.
••
لعل هذا هو الذي يعطيني بصيصاً من الأمل بعودة المحادثات كأنها لم تُحذف، مع أني لم أجرِ نسخاً احتياطياً ولا ربطت حسابي ببريد، لكن ..
أيُعقل أن تكون هذه حجم المساحة للتطبيق بعدما حذف جميع ما فيه إلّا لو كان ثمة أملٍ بعودة ما ضاع!
وعلى الرغم من أن حجم المجلدات في قائمة الملفات تغيرت، تبعاً لسياسة الواتس التي تستبدل القوائم في المجلدات من تلقاء نفسها، ولم أك نسختها أعني ملفات (Backups)
لكن، من يدري! الله قادر.
❤14👍2😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ghras1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ممّا قَرَأتُ : 📚 @readrr · 50,526 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
برنامج الراسخات في تعلم القراءات📚إيمان بنت صبحي إدلبي @imanidlibi · 39,341 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“غِراس الأُترج” (@ghras1), 4,947 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghras1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.