Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pro Космос

Channel

Pro Космос

@prokosmosru

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

51,715subscribers

-739 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001944501601
TypeChannel
Username@prokosmosru
DescriptionКаждый день рассказываем о космических технологиях, астрофизике и научных программах. Больше интересного на сайте: https://prokosmos.ru/ РКН: https://clck.ru/3PFgZX
Created31 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held67
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/prokosmosru

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@prokosmosru/11886 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC@kosmos_novosti_nauka/3398214 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC0.9525 hours
@prokosmosru/11963 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC@kosmos_novosti_nauka/3416327 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC0.9425 hours
@prokosmosru/12367 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 09:42 UTC@kosmos_novosti_nauka/349654 Nov 2026, 11:30 UTC0.9426 hours
@prokosmosru/12226 · this entry5 Oct 2026, 09:01 UTC@kosmos_novosti_nauka/346606 Oct 2026, 04:00 UTC0.9319 hours
@prokosmosru/12287 · this entry17 Oct 2026, 09:30 UTC@kosmos_novosti_nauka/3480318 Oct 2026, 04:00 UTC0.9219 hours
@prokosmosru/12394 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 07:07 UTC@kosmos_novosti_nauka/3501910 Nov 2026, 09:00 UTC0.9226 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@kosmos_novosti_nauka18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9323 hoursthis entry (18–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 443 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

51,71552,45452,084.56 August 202610 November 2026
67 measurements spanning 96 days, net -739. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,604–52,565 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 67
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 09:2251,715-18
8 Nov 2026, 18:3051,733-7
7 Nov 2026, 10:1551,740-5
6 Nov 2026, 11:3851,745-16
5 Nov 2026, 13:1051,761-6
4 Nov 2026, 14:3651,767-7
3 Nov 2026, 17:5551,774-4
2 Nov 2026, 20:4451,778-7
1 Nov 2026, 21:5651,785-15
31 Oct 2026, 20:0751,800-3
30 Oct 2026, 20:5151,803-13
29 Oct 2026, 20:5851,816-47
28 Oct 2026, 17:5551,863-9
27 Oct 2026, 18:0051,872-7
26 Oct 2026, 20:0751,879-15
25 Oct 2026, 19:5951,894-10
24 Oct 2026, 20:1851,904-5
23 Oct 2026, 16:5551,909-10
22 Oct 2026, 14:3851,919-9
21 Oct 2026, 11:1951,928first reading

Engagement

458 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.43%
avg views ÷ 51,715 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,880
129 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
129
of 458 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 128 of 129 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held458 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total629,081
Reactions total7,166
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈9,540
Videos
≈2,400
Links
≈8,420

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
42m 10s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

25,048 reactions across 446 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11,35945.3%
🤔3,72714.9%
❤3,30613.2%
🔥2,88011.5%
👏9023.60%
👀5892.35%
🤯5752.30%
😁5712.28%
🎉5172.06%
⚡3791.51%
🤩1540.615%
😍640.256%
🥰250.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 455 of the 458 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,422 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 458 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 21 of 129 posts held from the last 30 days (16.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC1 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🟣 Михаил Мишустин провёл стратегическую сессию по развитию российской космонавтики Премьер-министр предложил активнее привлекать частные компании к космическим проектам и расширять для них меры поддержки. 🚀 В этом году с Восточного при поддержке государства планируют впервые запустить два частных спутника. 💜 Pro Космос в МАКС | ВК | ОК | Дзен

11 Nov 2026, 09:34 UTC≈1,570 views43 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

⚡️ Алексей Лихачёв: Росатом в 2027 году выберет один из пяти вариантов лунной АЭС По словам главы Росатома, мощность установки достигнет 10 кВт. Она начнёт работу в середине 2030-х годов и будет обеспечивать энергией Международную научную лунную станцию (МНЛС). Параллельно ведутся работы по разработке мощного двигателя для космического тягача — для подъёма больших грузов или для дальних космических экспедиций. Вид…

🔥31❤4👏4👍2⚡1🥰1

11 Nov 2026, 07:05 UTC≈2,310 views40 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

😵‍💫 Озоновая дыра над Антарктидой в 2026 году вошла в топ-7 по площади за 48 лет наблюдений Один из факторов расширения — необычайно сильный антарктический полярный вихрь. При этом степень истощения озонового слоя в центре дыры оказалась меньше, чем в прошлые рекордные годы.

🤔23🤯12👏4❤1

10 Nov 2026, 14:34 UTC≈3,480 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🤖 ИИ поможет марсоходам определять, насколько глубоко закопаны камни Исследователи из Политехнического университета Виргинии предложили простой способ: по тому, как объект вибрирует после удара, оценивать, насколько глубоко он сидит в грунте. 🟣 Метод проверили на 18 бетонных блоках, закопанных в песок: вибрации замеряли лазером, а данные обрабатывала нейросеть. В будущем марсоходы смогут сами решать — убрать препя…

🤔18🔥8❤3👍3

10 Nov 2026, 12:21 UTC≈3,620 views60 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🛰 Спутники «Ямал-401» и «Ямал-300К» обеспечивают непрерывную связь в Арктике Спутниковый канал помогает координировать работу экипажей, оперативно вызывать помощь в нештатных ситуациях и прокладвать оптимальные маршруты. Технологию уже протестировали в 2025 году на судне «Академик Голицын», а в начале 2027-го планируют запустить ещё на трёх кораблях.

👍44⚡7🔥6❤1🎉1👏1

10 Nov 2026, 10:22 UTC≈3,730 views52 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

😊 Дмитрий Баканов: природоподобные технологии сократят зависимость дальних экспедиций от Земли На пленарной сессии IV Международного форума природоподобных технологий глава Роскосмоса рассказал, как решения, подсмотренные у природы, могут пригодиться в космонавтике. Для длительных экспедиций к Луне или Марсу нужна среда, способная долго работать без поставок с Земли. 🕣Фотобиореакторы предлагают объединить с устано…

👍34👏10🎉5❤2👀1

10 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC≈3,790 views60 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🪨 Камень 20 лет хранился у жителя Алтая — теперь это первый метеорит республики Местный житель подобрал его в 2005 году у реки Чулышман. В сентябре 2026 года находку утвердил Международный метеоритный комитет. 🕣Это 160-й зарегистрированный метеорит в России: исследователи определили его как обыкновенный хондрит группы H5, упавший, вероятно, не менее нескольких сотен лет назад.

👏35🎉13👍7🔥4❤1

9 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC≈4,070 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🟣 Сборная Роскосмоса подготовилась к чемпионату «Хайтек-2026» В команду вошли более 60 участников — они тренировались на 21 сертифицированной площадке в 7 регионах. 📅 «Хайтек-2026» пройдёт 9–13 ноября в Екатеринбурге, где сборная Госкорпорации поборется за звание сильнейших в 37 компетенциях. С 2019 года команда Роскосмоса входит в тройку лидеров чемпионата и дважды становилась абсолютным победителем общего медаль…

👍24👏5👀3🔥2❤1🎉1🤔1

9 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC≈4,050 views47 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🌎 Земля обзавелась новой мини-луной Небольшой астероид 2026 QQ8 попал под действие земной гравитации ещё в апреле, но заметили его только в августе. До конца года он останется рядом с нашей планетой, а в начале 2027-го уйдёт на самостоятельную орбиту вокруг Солнца. 🕣Размер QQ8 — около 2 метров. Для Земли он не опасен: такой астероид разрушился бы в атмосфере, не долетев до поверхности. 💜 Pro Космос в МАКС | ВК | О…

🔥24🤔12👍7❤3👏1

9 Nov 2026, 12:46 UTC≈3,800 views44 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⛰ После посадки — пешком по горам: к чему готовят космонавтов в Роскосмосе Иван Вагнер и Кирилл Песков прошли двухдневную тренировку в горах Туапсинского района: поднялись на две вершины, переночевали в гроте и вышли к точке эвакуации. Экипаж отрабатывал действия на случай нештатной посадки в горной местности. ⏺Горные тренировки проводят раз в 5 лет. Нештатная посадка в горах маловероятна, но такой случай уже был …

❤22👍17⚡4😍1

9 Nov 2026, 09:10 UTC≈3,900 views53 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

👨🏻‍🚀 В Звёздном городке прошла торжественная встреча экипажей МКС-74 В ЦПК приехали космонавты Роскосмоса Сергей Кудь-Сверчков, Сергей Микаев, Олег Платонов, Андрей Федяев, астронавты NASA Кристофер Уилльямс и Зина Кардман и астронавт JAXA Кимия Юи. По традиции они возложили цветы к памятнику Юрию Гагарину, а затем получили ведомственные награды Роскосмоса. 💜 Pro Космос в МАКС | ВК | ОК | Дзен

❤24👍23🔥5🎉1

9 Nov 2026, 07:07 UTC≈4,040 views54 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔭 Астрономы получили самое чёткое и чувствительное радиоизображение неба Телескоп LOFAR за 200 часов наблюдений собрал снимок участка неба в 25 раз больше полной Луны — на нём почти 63 тысячи радиоисточников. Разрешение позволяет различить детали под таким же углом, под каким мы видели бы монету с 10 км.

🤔33👍14❤3👀2👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 458 posts we hold for @prokosmosru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@prokosmosru edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @prokosmosru as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
13 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
15 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Oct 2026, 15:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz755 voters

Как в гидролаборатории ЦПК создают условия, похожие на невесомость?

  1. Гидроаналоги скафандров наполняют гелием, чтобы они стали легче воздуха10%
  2. Скафандры уравновешивают свинцовыми грузами55%
  3. В бассейн добавляют соль, чтобы вода стала плотнее35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,040 voters approx.

Что стало с Белкой и Стрелкой после полёта?

  1. Они отправились в ещё один полёт5%
  2. Они прожили до глубокой старости в виварии85%
  3. Их выпустили на волю10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz975 voters

Почему на орбиту выбирали собак-девочек?

  1. Они меньше весят11%
  2. Они лучше переносят шум6%
  3. Они более покладисты и терпеливы84%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz926 voters

Кто летел вместе с Белкой и Стрелкой?

  1. Кот и попугай2%
  2. Мыши, мухи, растения и грибы56%
  3. Только мыши43%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz882 voters

Сколько времени длился полёт Белки и Стрелки?

  1. 25 часов31%
  2. 48 часов26%
  3. 12 часов43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 458 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Роскосмос
@roscosmos_gk · 118,326
#1
Закрытый космос
@roscosmos_press · 14,574
#2
Летопись космической эры
@zheleznyakov_spaceera · 8,130
#3
Хайтек+
@htech_plus · 64,023
#4
Контакт подъема
@space78125 · 9,142
#5
РКК "Энергия"
@rsc_energia · 5,264
#6
WarGonzo
@wargonzo · 738,065
#7
Центр подготовки космонавтов имени Ю.А. Гагарина
@GagarinCosmonautTrainingCenter · 6,071
#8
Pro Космос | Космонавтика и астрофизика
@realprocosmos · 5,410
#9
Добрый Овчинников
@dobriy_ovchinnikov · 6,243
#10
Космодайвер
@cosmodivers · 4,949
#11
Космический Хроникон
@grimdarknessoffarspace · 3,009
#12
Спутник ДЗЗ
@sputnikDZZ · 4,973
#13
SPUTNIX
@sputnixru · 2,504
#14
Леонид Еленин | Писатель и астроном
@leonideleninofficial · 4,494
#15
ИКИ РАН (пресс-служба)
@mediaiki · 2,985
#16
Космос на связи
@rscc_rscc · 2,388
#17
Ветер Восточный 🚀
@wind_vostok · 2,885
#18
Alice in Wonder New Space / Алиса Зарипова
@aliceinwondernewspace · 1,974
#19
В космосе никто не услышит твой смех
@kosmosmem · 1,979
#20
Планшет Гагарина
@planshetgagarina · 2,092
#21
Космический фотоальбом
@myown_link · 3,250
#22
Я сказал «Поехали»!
@cosmotours · 9,766
#23
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 525,130
#24
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 750,635
#25
Два майора
@dva_majors · 1,161,954
#26
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,436
#27
Старше Эдды
@vysokygovorit · 485,001
#28
Милитарист
@infantmilitario · 275,861
#29
Mash
@mash · 3,140,033
#30
Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны
@rvvoenkor · 1,452,307
#31
Резидент
@rezident_ua · 956,216
#32
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,012,342
#33
СОЛОВЬЁВ
@solovievlive · 1,113,787
#34
Военный Осведомитель
@milinfolive · 614,488
#35
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,735,796
#36
МИГ России
@mig41 · 476,724
#37
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 490,249
#38
Повёрнутые на войне 🇷🇺
@voenacher · 658,288
#39
Kotsnews
@sashakots · 469,475
#40
Белорусский силовик
@belarusian_silovik · 449,848
#41
Кирилл Фёдоров / Война История Оружие
@warhistoryalconafter · 478,135
#42
Легитимный
@legitimniy · 1,041,883
#43
Сладков+
@sladkov_plus · 692,737
#44
Воевода Вещает
@ZOV_Voevoda · 166,392
#45
ЗеРада
@zerada1 · 423,271
#46
ZERGULIO
@SergeyKolyasnikov · 443,879
#47
Zлой Пруф️
@proofzzz · 605,158
#48
Пул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 331,028
#49
Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition
@epoddubny · 568,057
#50
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 664,380
#51
Банкста
@banksta · 439,838
#52
ТАСС
@tass_agency · 569,137
#53
Украина.ру
@ukr_2025_ru · 494,061
#54
Минобороны России
@mod_russia · 649,746
#55
Бочарик (ага, тот самый)
@botcharov · 209,248
#56
Русский инженер
@rusengineer · 124,120
#57
Олег Царёв
@olegtsarov · 401,214
#58
Военный обозреватель
@new_militarycolumnist · 204,409
#59
Win-Win
@victorstepanych · 155,203
#60
SHOT
@shot_shot · 1,265,529
#61
Осташко! Важное
@ostashkonews · 426,398
#62
Военкор Котенок
@voenkorKotenok · 308,803
#63
RAG&E - Razvedos Advanced Gear & Equipment
@razvedosaa · 137,293
#64
ИноСМИ
@inosmichannel · 142,817
#65
Выпускайте КракенаZ!
@rlz_the_kraken · 517,765
#66
ANNA NEWS
@anna_news · 228,568
#67
Мир Михаила Онуфриенко
@mikle1on · 483,742
#68
Крупнокалиберный Переполох
@bolshiepushki · 322,779
#69
bmpd
@bmpd_cast · 46,716
#70
Spydell_finance
@spydell_finance · 131,111
#71
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 968,108
#72
Ловец Человеков | Елена Залесская
@iamhumancatcher · 118,266
#73
Геоэнергетика ИНФО
@geonrgru · 138,997
#74
Коза кричала
@kozakrichala · 181,638
#75
Военное обозрение
@topwar_official · 95,688
#76
Саваничи 🇷🇺
@savanichi · 192,598
#77
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,546
#78
Yaplakal.com
@yaplakal · 419,820
#79
Мария Захарова
@mariavladimirovnazakharova · 458,003
#80
Захар Прилепин
@zakharprilepin · 221,419
#81
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 913,555
#82
Разработчик БПЛА
@UAVDEV · 125,267
#83
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,662,248
#84
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,688,832
#85
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,557,057
#86
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 429,055
#87
Александр Ходаковский
@aleksandr_skif · 313,405
#88
Рамзай
@ramzayiegokomanda · 150,922
#89
ZАПИСКИ VЕТЕРАНА 🇷🇺
@notes_veterans · 273,805
#90
ТРОЙКА 🏴‍☠️
@rustroyka1945 · 188,687
#91

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Хайтек+
@htech_plus · 64,023
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Роскосмос
@roscosmos_gk · 118,326
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Kosmos Time | Наука | Физика
@kosmostime · 63,144
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
Olegmks
@oleg_mks · 23,613
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
Космонавт Константин Борисов
@borisov_cosmonaut · 21,424
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
Наука
@naukatv_ru · 23,587
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Мир Космоса
@kosmos_go · 36,646
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pro Космос” (@prokosmosru), 51,715 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prokosmosru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.