Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Pro Космос

@prokosmosru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

52,364subscribers

-90 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001944501601
TypeChannel
Username@prokosmosru
Created31 March 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prokosmosru

Growth

52,36452,45452,4096 August 2026 — 52,454 subscribers6 August 2026 — 52,454 subscribers6 August 2026 — 52,445 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,442 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,435 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,425 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52,421 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,405 subscribers12 August 2026 — 52,393 subscribers13 August 2026 — 52,364 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,351–52,468 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:0552,364-29
12 Aug 2026, 02:1652,393-12
11 Aug 2026, 03:3652,405-16
10 Aug 2026, 07:0252,421-4
9 Aug 2026, 07:5452,425-10
8 Aug 2026, 07:2352,435-7
7 Aug 2026, 10:2752,442-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:1052,445-9
6 Aug 2026, 02:0052,454no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:5252,454first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.15%
avg views ÷ 52,364 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,270
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held44 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total187,770
Reactions total2,136
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 31s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,762 reactions across 36 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍97455.3%
23313.2%
🔥20711.7%
🤔1488.40%
👏412.33%
🎉402.27%
😁362.04%
341.93%
🤯231.31%
👀90.511%
😍90.511%
🤩80.454%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC≈1,620 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🌑 Не пропустите солнечное затмение Сегодня ожидается несколько астрономических явлений. Помимо звездопада Персеид, парада планет, жители северных и северо-западных регионов России увидят солнечное затмение — Роскосмос покажет его в прямом эфире. 🔭 Наблюдательная площадка — Лахта Центр. ⌛️ Начало трансляции — 19:50 мск. Видео солнечного затмения Николая Вдовина от 29 марта 2025 года

🔥9👍61

12 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC≈2,010 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🌑 Не пропустите солнечное затмение Сегодня ожидается несколько астрономических явлений. Помимо метеорного потока Персеиды и парада планет, жители северных и северо-западных регионов России увидят солнечное затмение — Роскосмос покажет его в прямом эфире. 🔭 Наблюдательная площадка — Лахта Центр. ⌛️ Начало трансляции — 19:50 мск. Видео солнечного затмения Николая Вдовина от 29 марта 2025 года.

👍12

12 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈2,270 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

«РЕШЕТНЁВ» провёл стыковочные испытания системы коррекции для спутников «Экспресс-РВ» Тесты проходили в горизонтальной вакуумной камере. Специалисты имитировали работу двигателей коррекции в условиях, максимально приближенных к космическим. 🕣Задача «Экспресс-РВ» — обеспечить широкополосный доступ в интернет на всей территории России, в том числе на Северном морском пути и Северном полюсе.

👍2012🤩7🔥5👏1

12 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈2,810 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌙 Учёные предложили новый способ поиска льда на Луне Лёд нужен будущим лунным миссиям как источник воды, но его не так просто обнаружить — залежи не видно на обычных снимках. Исследователи предлагают искать подповерхностный лёд с помощью сейсмических волн от лунотрясений.

👍17

12 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈3,170 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌗 NASA предложило Индии участвовать в программе «Артемида» по освоению Луны Приглашение прозвучало на заседании Индийско-американской рабочей группы по научному и технологическому сотрудничеству в Бангалоре. На данный момент соглашения «Артемиды» уже подписала 61 страна, включая Австралию, Великобританию, Италию, Канаду, ОАЭ и Японию.

🤔23😁8👍711👀1🤯1

12 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC≈3,330 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚪️Rocket Lab разработала мобильный пусковой комплекс Компания представила контейнерную систему GHOST для пусков ракет Electron и HASTE. Всё наземное оборудование теперь можно перевозить в контейнерах и быстрее разворачивать стартовую инфраструктуру на новых площадках. «Мобильность» комплекса не означает возможность проведения пусков из любой точки. Развёртывание такой системы по-прежнему жёстко привязано к баллисти

👍13🤔10🤯31👀1

11 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈3,950 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

⭐️ Как не пропустить самое яркое астрономическое событие этого лета? В ночь с 12 на 13 августа небо озарят Персеиды. В 2026 году есть уникальный шанс увидеть зрелище во всей красе, ведь пик активности совпадает с новолунием. ⁉️ Как образуются Персеиды? «Родительское тело» звездопада — комета 109P/Свифта — Туттля, которая возвращается к Солнцу раз в 133 года. Земля, каждый год пересекает пылевой шлейф. Мельчайшие ча

25👍17🔥4

11 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈3,660 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚪️ Корабль «Прогресс МС-35» проверили на герметичность на Байконуре В течение 5 дней «грузовик» проходил испытания в вакуумной камере, где имитируются условия космоса. В камере внутрь отсеков «Прогресса» подают гелиево-воздушную смесь — атомы гелия могут проникать в микротрещины, а чувствительные приборы мгновенно фиксируют его утечку. Далее «Прогрессу МС-35» предстоит проверка панелей солнечных батарей.

25👍151👏1

11 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC≈3,650 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏭 Глава Минпромторга и гендиректор Роскосмоса посетили НПО Лавочкина и НПО Энергомаш Антон Алиханов и Дмитрий Баканов ознакомились с производственным потенциалом предприятий в Химках. В поездке также участвовали губернатор Московской области Андрей Воробьев и депутат Госдумы Денис Кравченко. В ходе визита обсудили внедрение отечественных цифровых систем, обеспечение предприятий заказами и поддержку молодых специали

👍2310👀1

11 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC≈3,700 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

💨 Пуск китайской ракеты-носителя «Чанчжэн-7А» 10 августа завершился разрушением носителя Первые секунды полёта проходили штатно. Однако спустя примерно 80–85 секунд после старта случилась «механическая аномалия». Полезная нагрузка потеряна. Почему надломилась китайская ракета? Разобрали причины аварии в новом материале.

🤔33🤯53🎉3👍2

11 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC≈3,820 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👨🏻‍🚀 Космонавты экспедиции МКС-76 прошли тренировку по сближению «Союза» с МКС Дмитрий Петелин и Константин Борисов начали с предстартовой подготовки корабля. Затем они отработали старт, выведение на орбиту и отделение корабля «Союз» от третьей ступени ракеты, после чего перешли к двухсуточному сближению с МКС. Космонавты успешно выполнили программу тренировки и справились со всеми нештатными ситуациями.

👍26🎉65🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC≈4,140 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌈 Как на Марсе возникают локальные полярные сияния? Учёные выяснили: марсианские полярные сияния формируются почти так же, как земные. Заряженные частицы солнечного ветра попадают в атмосферу Красной планеты через миниатюрные магнитные области, сохранившиеся в коре.

👍20105

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @prokosmosru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 86,077 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pro Космос” (@prokosmosru), 52,364 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prokosmosru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.