Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Контакт подъема

@space78125

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,102subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001350931559
TypeChannel
Username@space78125
DescriptionСовременная космонавтика — просто, интересно и из первых рук. Автор канала - научный журналист Михаил Котов
Created17 February 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/space78125

Growth

9,1029,1169,1096 August 2026 — 9,116 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,115 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,102 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,100–9,118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 00:519,102-13
6 Aug 2026, 18:109,115-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:529,116first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.0%
avg views ÷ 9,102 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,000
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held17 (19 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total34,070
Reactions total972
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,210
Videos
214
Links
1,270

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

972 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥43344.5%
24825.5%
👍20621.2%
😁313.19%
😢222.26%
🥰121.23%
😍90.926%
😱40.412%
🤩40.412%
👎30.309%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 972reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @space78125. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC≈1,130 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кстати, что интересно, раньше тюльпаны Борщова на Байконуре были и красные и оранжевые и жёлтые. Сейчас почему то остались почти одни только жёлтые. Знать бы почему...

😢22🔥12👍3

8 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,090 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А пока я в коротком отпуске по русскому северу, держите картину. Хорошую.

🔥17👍4

8 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,110 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @minutkatransPhoto

Сергей Бессонов "Байконур. Весна 1961 года" (2013)

🔥4715🤩4👍3😁2👎1

2 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC≈3,480 views91 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Летняя космическая школа не проходит бесследно. Без исключений. Сегодня последний день.

🔥41😁16👍14🥰98😍3

31 Jul 2026, 08:07 UTC≈2,070 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Где бы мы ни были — мы в нужном месте и в нужное время. Летняя космическая школа продолжается.

🔥5127👍20😁8😱2

26 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC≈6,510 views93 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Хороший был сегодня день. Насыщенный. Пока мы с Аней вели трансляцию сегодняшней посадки, какой-то начинающий бодибилдер, удивительно похожий на Николаса Оксмана, передал привет всем читателям канала!!! ЗЫ Естественно потом мел был стёрт, а чистота спускаемого аппарата восстановлена.

🔥4826👍15😁4

26 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC≈2,020 views87 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @kosmosmylife

Posted without readable text

51👍20🔥13🥰2😁1

26 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC≈1,250 views33 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @roscosmos_gk

📍 Земля, встречай экипаж Сегодня в 13:27 мск спускаемый аппарат корабля «Союз МС-28» приземлился в районе города Жезказган. На борту — космонавты Роскосмоса Сергей Кудь-Сверчков и Сергей Микаев, а также астронавт NASA Кристофер Уилльямс. Утром корабль отстыковался от модуля «Рассвет». Его сведение с орбиты и спуск на Землю прошли штатно! Итоги экспедиции МКС-74

🔥17👍103😍2🥰1

26 Jul 2026, 06:34 UTC≈1,870 views61 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Летняя космическая школа уже летит встречать космонавтов, возвращающихся с МКС. Спасибо замечательному фотографу Артёму Пылаеву, что взял с собой нашу ремувку, ждём прекрасных фото с посадки! На всякий случай напомню - любоваться другими фотографиями Артема - тут!

🔥4314👍4

26 Jul 2026, 05:26 UTC≈1,310 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @roscosmos_gk

🔴 Люки между бытовым отсеком корабля «Союз МС-28» и МКС закрыты На Землю возвращаются Сергей Кудь-Сверчков, Сергей Микаев и астронавт Кристофер Уилльямс. ▶️ Следующий этап — расстыковка корабля и модуля «Рассвет». По плану — в 10:03 мск. Ссылка на прямую трансляцию, начало эфира в 09:55 мск

👍19🔥2

25 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC≈2,070 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Началась новая, уже двенадцатая Летняя космическая школа. Почти двести участников и более ста интереснейших лекторов из самых разных институтов и предприятий нашей страны. Учёные, инженеры, специалисты девять дней будут рассказывать участникам о своей деятельности, а параллельно с этим на практике одиннадцать секций будут учить создавать антенны, для приема информации из космоса, проектировать ракеты и космические а

29🔥20👍12😍4

25 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC≈1,230 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @roscosmos_gkPhoto

🔴 26 июля экипаж корабля «Союз МС-28» вернётся домой. На борту — Сергей Кудь-Сверчков, Сергей Микаев и астронавт Кристофер Уилльямс Экипаж жил и работал на Международной космической станции с ноября прошлого года. Об итогах экспедиции рассказали в ролике Приглашаем вас провести это воскресенье вместе — смотрите три прямые трансляции в наших социальных сетях: ▪️ Закрытие люков между кораблём и орбитальной станцией

🔥15👍102

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @space78125. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 93,783 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Контакт подъема” (@space78125), 9,102 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/space78125.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.