Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Закрытый космос

Channel

Закрытый космос

@roscosmos_press

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

14,548subscribers

-104 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001516731445
TypeChannel
Username@roscosmos_press
Description"Наши не придут. Все наши- это мы" © https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673607a87de0911509ed4127&registryType=bloggersPermission #TK5FV По сотрудничеству 👉 @agrekova
Created18 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/roscosmos_press

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,54814,65714,602.55 August 2026 — 14,652 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,652 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,650 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,648 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,650 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,646 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,647 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,648 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,647 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,641 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,652 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,657 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,653 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,652 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,648 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,646 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,642 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,643 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,642 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,643 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,637 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,634 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,627 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,625 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,622 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,621 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,622 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,615 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,613 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,611 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,601 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,597 subscribers28 September 2026 — 14,595 subscribers5 October 2026 — 14,593 subscribers9 October 2026 — 14,606 subscribers13 October 2026 — 14,596 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,597 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,596 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,593 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,588 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,589 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,590 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,591 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,588 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,591 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,589 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,588 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,586 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,585 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,584 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,587 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,590 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,586 subscribers7 November 2026 — 14,585 subscribers9 November 2026 — 14,574 subscribers11 November 2026 — 14,548 subscribers5 August 202611 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 98 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,532–14,673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 17:4714,548-26
9 Nov 2026, 22:0614,574-11
7 Nov 2026, 04:4714,585-1
6 Nov 2026, 02:0714,586-4
5 Nov 2026, 01:1714,590+3
3 Nov 2026, 21:4514,587+3
2 Nov 2026, 23:1214,584-1
2 Nov 2026, 01:2014,585-1
30 Oct 2026, 09:5014,586-2
29 Oct 2026, 07:5114,588-1
27 Oct 2026, 05:1914,589-2
26 Oct 2026, 05:5614,591+3
24 Oct 2026, 06:2714,588-3
23 Oct 2026, 08:1114,591+1
22 Oct 2026, 06:0114,590+1
20 Oct 2026, 22:2714,589+1
18 Oct 2026, 18:2814,588-5
17 Oct 2026, 15:3814,593-3
16 Oct 2026, 16:5814,596-1
14 Oct 2026, 19:0614,597first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.3%
avg views ÷ 14,548 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,550
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held56 (20 June 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total136,630
Reactions total1,525
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 19:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,850
Videos
≈272
Links
≈1,440

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
32m 03s
Average length
5m 21s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,349 reactions across 54 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍59617.8%
❤49714.8%
🔥38611.5%
🤣35610.6%
😁3349.97%
🤔1584.72%
💯1223.64%
👏1133.37%
🤬962.87%
👀952.84%
👎792.36%
🙊682.03%
🙏682.03%
😱672.00%
😭651.94%
🫡511.52%
😢401.19%
🙈401.19%
😐200.597%
🎉180.537%
9 further kinds802.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,429 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 09:33 UTC≈2,600 views44 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Никакого дефицита легких ракет у нас нет. Ежедневно и еженощно это доказываем соседу 😎 https://www.vedomosti.ru/technology/news/2026/11/11/1244320-dlya-malih-sputnikov

😁30🤨7🔥3💔2🙊2

11 Nov 2026, 07:04 UTC≈2,160 views54 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @zheleznyakov_spaceeraPhoto

Росатом изучает пять вариантов лунных атомных станций, и в 2027 году предстоит сделать выбор в пользу одного из вариантов. Об этом говорится в комментарии генерального директора госкорпорации Алексея Лихачева по итогам стратсессии в правительстве по развитию космической деятельности РФ, передаёт ТАСС. "Развернута огромная работа Росатомом, Курчатовским институтом, Академией наук по нахождению именно таких источников …

😁18👍17🙊14❤4🤔1

11 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC≈2,540 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/9094031 Бывает открытый, а бывает закрытый

🤣13😱3💯2❤1👀1

11 Nov 2026, 06:52 UTC≈2,280 views23 reactionsread 11 November 2026

https://www.vedomosti.ru/technology/characters/2026/11/11/1244253-chastnaya-kosmicheskaya-raketa-nositel

😁16👍7

10 Nov 2026, 14:31 UTC≈2,360 views64 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @government_rusVideo

Михаил Мишустин провёл стратегическую сессию по развитию отечественной космонавтики Председатель Правительства отметил, что космическая отрасль является одной из ключевых движущих сил технологического развития страны. С текущего года действует нацпроект «Космос». На его реализацию в ближайшие 11 лет запланировано выделить более 4 трлн рублей. 💬Эти средства должны использоваться максимально эффективно, приносить ощ…

🤣34👍15😁8❤4🕊3

10 Nov 2026, 07:26 UTC≈2,920 views69 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @archive_rasPhoto

10 ноября 1921 года Совет Народных Комиссаров РСФСР под председательством В.И. Ленина принял постановление о назначении Константину Эдуардовичу Циолковскому пожизненной пенсии: «Ввиду особых заслуг учёного-изобретателя, специалиста по авиации, назначить К.Э. Циолковскому пожизненную пенсию в размере 500 000 рублей в месяц с распространением на этот оклад всех последующих повышений тарифных ставок». Отдельно, помимо …

🔥35👍16❤11👏4🎉3

9 Nov 2026, 17:12 UTC≈3,140 views62 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

ЗВЕЗДЫ НАД ДОНБАССОМ В столице ДНР — Донецке — завершился международный фестиваль, организованный Союзом писателей России, «Звёзды над Донбассом». Главная тема — научно-популярная и социальная фантастика, литература будущего. «Это кажется, что политики придумывают будущее, — будущее придумывают писатели, — подчеркнул в своём выступлении Юрий Поляков. — И сегодня, в непростое время, здесь рождаются талантливые молод…

👍30🤣18❤9🤩4❤‍🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC≈3,290 views83 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🚀 Рада поддержала создание Космических сил ВСУ (по материалам СМИ противника) Парламент принял законопроект о внесении изменений в Закон Украины "О Вооружённых силах Украины". Документ предусматривает развитие космических технологий для усиления обороноспособности Украины. В частности, речь идёт о создании собственной системы раннего предупреждения о запусках вражеских ракет и разработке средств противодействия та…

🤣57🤔16😐6🔥3👎1

8 Nov 2026, 11:11 UTC≈3,270 views99 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @archive_rasPhoto

В этот день, 8 ноября 1976 года, министр обороны СССР Дмитрий Федорович Устинов утвердил тактико-техническое задание на разработку многоразовой космической системы «Энергия»-«Буран», выданное Главным управлением космических средств Министерства обороны СССР. Создание «Бурана» было ответом на американскую программу «Спейс Шаттл», которую в СССР рассматривали как потенциально военную угрозу. Поэтому подпись Министра о…

👍48❤30😢16🔥5

6 Nov 2026, 08:48 UTC≈4,140 views44 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Ручку, я так понял, уже отполировали

🤣28👎9😁5🙊2

6 Nov 2026, 08:48 UTC≈4,210 views39 reactionsread 11 November 2026

"Корабль этот экспедиционный" https://tass.ru/kosmos/28287283

🤣26👍6😁5❤1🙊1

4 Nov 2026, 12:01 UTC≈4,910 views66 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Настоящим провозглашаю, что Солнечная система и всё космическое пространство за пределами Земли являются достоянием всех людей и открыты для исследования, освоения, использования и создания постоянного присутствия американскими гражданами в соответствии с законодательством США и международными обязательствами Соединённых Штатов... https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/11/the-american-declaration-of-fr…

🤣41😐8🔥7😁6🤬4

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @roscosmos_press. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Pro Космос
@prokosmosru · 51,715
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Роскосмос
@roscosmos_gk · 118,326
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Космонавт Константин Борисов
@borisov_cosmonaut · 21,424
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
Астрофизика с Тим
@kosmos_int · 53,998
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
Olegmks
@oleg_mks · 23,613
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
Дмитрий Конаныхин 🇷🇺
@grishkafilippov · 35,787
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
ОДК
@uecrus_official · 23,694
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
AstroAlert | Наблюдательная астрономия
@astroalert · 46,736
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Наука
@naukatv_ru · 23,587
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Луна-26 (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…будет запущена в 2026 году{{cite web|url=https://t.me/roscosmos_press/563|title=Закрытй космос|work=Telegram|date=2022-12-14|a…”
read 1 November 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Закрытый космос” (@roscosmos_press), 14,548 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roscosmos_press.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.