1 Mar 2022, 20:36 UTC56 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel
Wut Da?
@WutDaHmmm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001472974974 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WutDaHmmm |
| Description | TTMYGHmmm |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 8 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WutDaHmmm |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 6 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 6 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 8 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 41
- Videos
- 22
- Links
- 29
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 36s
- Average length
- 52s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
30 Jan 2022, 00:21 UTC58 viewsread 12 August 2026
I appreciate Project Veritas as much as the next guy but this is gayer than a bag of dicks https://t.me/project_veritas/1441
5 Jan 2022, 02:36 UTC46 viewsread 12 August 2026
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/amazons-gender-recognition-system-identified-michelle-obama-and-serena-williams-as-men/ You don’t say 🤔😂
29 Dec 2021, 23:27 UTCviews —
Wut Da? pinned a video
29 Dec 2021, 23:26 UTC21 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
How much do you think tickets will cost to hear Flynn tell his story one day? lol 😆
20 Dec 2021, 17:16 UTC43 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
The virus is communism. Self interest is NEVER a bad thing. Without it, our species would have never made it this far. Fact.
10 Dec 2021, 02:24 UTC47 viewsread 12 August 2026
Q: What do these 2 concepts have in common? 1. Joe Biden is the President because he beat Donald Trump in a free and fair election in 2020 1. COVID-19 is so dangerous we must reshape society worldwide and everyone on the planet needs to be “vaccinated” for us to ever go back to “normal” A: Belief, and submission to the belief. That’s it. Who controls reality? Us? Or [them]?
9 Nov 2021, 02:22 UTC58 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
So Newsom has Bell’s Palsy after his 3rd mix n match booster badge but still wants to force vax your kids and give them myocarditis. Got it. https://t.me/disclosetv/5509
5 Nov 2021, 02:29 UTC15 viewsread 12 August 2026
There’s no one as blind as he who can see but chooses not to - me
4 Nov 2021, 17:32 UTC45 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
14 Oct 2021, 19:06 UTC55 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
14 Oct 2021, 19:04 UTC15 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @project_veritasVideo
BREAKING: Pfizer Senior Director of Worldwide Research Vanessa Gelman RUNS from Veritas' Questions
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @WutDaHmmm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wut Da?” (@WutDaHmmm), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WutDaHmmm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.