Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ритуалы онлайн

@expops

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23,011subscribers

-32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001933529111
TypeChannel
Username@expops
DescriptionОнли ориджинал мэдскиллз шитпостинг. Связь: @iloveturbulence Все ссылки в закрепленном сообщении.
Created28 March 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/expops

Growth

23,01123,04423,027.56 August 2026 — 23,043 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,043 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,044 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,037 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,030 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,024 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,025 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,011 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,006–23,049 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:0323,011-14
11 Aug 2026, 17:5623,025+1
10 Aug 2026, 20:3123,024-6
8 Aug 2026, 17:3623,030-7
7 Aug 2026, 15:1723,037-7
6 Aug 2026, 14:4023,044+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:0123,043no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5923,043first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.7%
avg views ÷ 23,011 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,080
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held34 (29 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total138,620
Reactions total4,057
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,360
Videos
439
Links
353

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 50s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,057 reactions across 34 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54248095876834019401,21429.9%
custom 52966750151382230041,06326.2%
77019.0%
💋1223.01%
🔥1082.66%
😭1082.66%
💯992.44%
🎃751.85%
🕊731.80%
💘691.70%
😢681.68%
😁601.48%
🍓591.45%
👾501.23%
🥰471.16%
👏140.345%
🙏140.345%
🤓110.271%
❤‍🔥90.222%
💔90.222%
8 further kinds150.37%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,057reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 34 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @expops. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC≈1,570 views98 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

это че за бэкрумс

49custom 542480958768340194032custom 529667501513822300414👾1💘1🤝1

12 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈2,250 views111 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @zub_idkVideo

однажды мы все будем толстыми итальянцами на берегу моря. если вы конечно хотите быть толстыми итальянцами на берегу моря. я хочу.

custom 52966750151382230047023custom 542480958768340194013💘3👾1🥰1

11 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC≈2,660 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @HVCtapesVideo

Video, posted without a caption

32custom 529667501513822300414custom 54248095876834019407🙏4💋2👾1💔1

11 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC≈2,660 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @jourchatingVideo

Video, posted without a caption

26custom 542480958768340194010custom 52966750151382230047🕊2👾1💋1💔1💯1

10 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC≈3,080 views110 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓55custom 54248095876834019402016custom 529667501513822300413🙏3💋2👾1

10 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC≈2,920 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @polariss_aVideo

Video, posted without a caption

😭31custom 529667501513822300417custom 542480958768340194072😁2👾1💋1

10 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC≈3,220 views130 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

62custom 542480958768340194042custom 529667501513822300414😭8🎃2👾1💋1

10 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC≈3,050 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @zub_idkVideo

возможно это вы с утра едете на работу. возможно это видео про вас. а возможно вы смотрите, как кто-то так едет на работу, отдыхая у себя дома летним утром. я уточню.

70custom 542480958768340194024custom 529667501513822300412👾1💋1

9 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈3,480 views130 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 542480958768340194078custom 52966750151382230043210😁5🎃2👾1🤗1🙏1

9 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC≈3,510 views136 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54248095876834019408118💘17custom 529667501513822300414🍓2👾2🎃1🤝1

8 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈3,810 views148 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 529667501513822300496custom 54248095876834019402213💘7😁4🥴2❤‍🔥1🍓1

7 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC≈3,680 views129 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @st_apathyPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🕊62🥰27custom 529667501513822300421💔76🎃3❤‍🔥1🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @expops. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 100,517 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ритуалы онлайн” (@expops), 23,011 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/expops.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.