С 02.09.25
Информационная война. Теория и практика. Стратегии, тактики, инструменты борьбы и противоборства.
Автор в окопах информационной войны задолго до того, как это стало мейнстримом.
Created
Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 7 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 75 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 7 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @kapibar_books. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Views per post sit far above this size band
7,790 average views per post against 7,150 subscribers — an engagement rate of 108.9%. Across the 16,385 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,183–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 6.90% and 25.3%, with a median of 13.6%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
20 of 20 published in the window (2 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
155,713
Mature posts only
125.3% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_source · err_high, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 7 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net +1,066. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,081–7,467 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 12:06
7,307
+78
6 Nov 2026, 06:10
7,229
+79
2 Nov 2026, 21:46
7,150
+100
30 Oct 2026, 18:19
7,050
+2
27 Oct 2026, 20:36
7,048
+39
24 Oct 2026, 13:50
7,009
+167
21 Oct 2026, 13:27
6,842
+15
18 Oct 2026, 16:11
6,827
+4
15 Oct 2026, 20:45
6,823
+62
12 Oct 2026, 10:21
6,761
+102
6 Oct 2026, 01:41
6,659
+45
15 Sept 2026, 15:55
6,614
+29
12 Sept 2026, 08:58
6,585
+48
8 Sept 2026, 13:36
6,537
+77
3 Sept 2026, 00:05
6,460
+29
31 Aug 2026, 04:53
6,431
-5
28 Aug 2026, 03:23
6,436
-6
25 Aug 2026, 03:03
6,442
-29
21 Aug 2026, 09:27
6,471
-7
18 Aug 2026, 07:48
6,478
first reading
Engagement
85 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
116.7%
avg views ÷ 7,307 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,530
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 85 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
85 (2 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
383,680
Reactions total
5,705
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 08:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
707
Videos
355
Links
988
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
16m 58s
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,043 reactions across 71 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5334820788652506113
6,233
77.5%
custom 5334581163837128314
1,263
15.7%
custom 5314723532867927339
451
5.61%
custom 5335031830460530701
96
1.19%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,358 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 85 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @infowar_rus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 85 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 45 posts held from the last 30 days (42.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Как говорится, «не благодарите».
И даже тут, зеркало все равно опасно, если есть «глаза» на земле. Могут активировать при осмотре.
Робот на радиоуправлении с камерой — надежнее и безопаснее многократно.
Цена вопроса чуть больше 4000 рублей. Жизнь — бесценна.
Есть другие варианты подобных роботов. Главное: компактность, хорошая дальность действия, видео сигнал, высокая подвижность камеры и её хорошее качество.
К…
Сегодня в 19:05 на канале Россия 1 выйдет продолжение крайне тяжелого, сложного и сверхважного разговора, начатого «Предательством»: фильм «Предательство. Расходный материал».
Я очень прошу взрослых посмотреть фильм вместе со своими детьми, подростками и кто постарше. И потом поговорить. Обязательно поговорить! Посмотрите сегодня по ТВ, на выходных на платформе «Смотрим», как угодно, но посмотреть надо обязательно.
…
Я последовательный адепт подхода, что доступ к LLM-нейросетям можно давать не раньше окончания института. А ещё лучше где-то лет в 25.
Западные нейронки имеют колоссальный уровень ангажированности, незаметно обрабатывая сознание пользователей (за единственным, пожалуй, исключением) (в то время как наши ИИ — играют в "нейтральность", за счет чего теряется львина доля российского влияния и внедрения адекватной нашим и…
Касательно массовости публикаций на тему российской гибридной войны — не преувеличиваю совершенно.
И эта истерия распространяется далеко за пределы Европы. И прекрасно подсвечивает всю западную сеть и проекты влияния, нацеленные на Азию, Африку и ЛА.
Сырой мониторинг за 24 часа выглядит так. Это условно сырая рыба, выловленная в океане информации. Чисто для ознакомления. Количество дезы и откровенных манипуляций не…
Вся возня европейцев на тему того, что "это не может решаться без нас" обусловлена тем, что они вбухали в проект антиРоссии миллиарды, в том числе в кредит. И перед ними всплывает экзистенциальный по своим последствиям вопрос: а кто будет это всё им возвращать. Они этот проект и эту войну профинансировали и продолжают это делать, рассчитывая на "репарации" с России и на возвращение кредитов Украиной. Но ситуация скла…
Не вполне понятно паясничество на тему «перспектив» и «разве в XXI веке можно допустить мысль, что где-то в цивилизованной стране не будет интернета и мобильной сети». К последствиям работы ненавистного всеми МинЦифры это прямого отношение не имеет, если на то намек.
Мир жил в парадигме Фукуямы и «конца истории». Технологии стремительно развивались, вытесняя в том числе и радио. Всем казалось, что теперь-то у нас бу…
Тем гнуснее выглядит недавний вброс.
То, что МВД-то как раз работает лучше многих ведомств, несмотря на все колоссальные трудности и внутренние неизживаемые проблемы — сомнений особо не было.
Подобные дезы, что на скринах, создают и канализируют недовольство в правой и патриотичной части населения в сторону Думы и конкретной партийной единицы, представляющей власть, таким образом нагнетая дополнительные общественны…
Из всех видов искусства — литература самое сильное по воздействию и его долгосрочности. Книги и знания из них полученные укореняются, они формируют культурный код, систему мышления, мироровоззрение.
Вокруг литературы вертится сейчас много чего не хорошего. Бывают PsyOps. А бывают вполне себе грассрутинговые ситуации, быстро расходящиеся по сетям. Проблема, что их инструментализируют умельцы против госсистемы, хотя л…
Новости из страны нерабов европейского пути.
В апреле–мае 2025 года Департамент регионального развития Киевской ОВА заключил 25 договоров на строительство защитных сооружений для энергообъектов на общую сумму около 1,89 млрд гривен, за всеми компаниями стоял один человек — Владислав Соколов. Защитных сооружений так и не появилось — зато появился пентхаус и рептилия, у Соколова.
Нам хихикать над сим западло. У самих…
Господа. Особенно журналисты. ЛОМы. Медиа-издания. И все прочие, разносящие треш-контент в исполнении лиц с низкой социальной ответственностью.
Поскольку некоторым гражданам невозможно запретить, К СОЖАЛЕНИЮ, пользоваться интернетом, общаться с прессой и вести прочую словесно-подрывную деятельность в отношении общественной стабильности и благополучия, как и не возможно наказать за построение медийности исключительно…
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @infowar_rus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@infowar_rus edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
4 November 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 56 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 111 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@infowar_rus named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@infowar named in 2 posts, 14 November 2026 – 14 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“infoWAR” (@infowar_rus), 7,307 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infowar_rus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
