Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

OMON Moscow

@omonmoscow

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,444subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001457644020
TypeChannel
Username@omonmoscow
DescriptionВзгляд на жизнь из-под забрала защитного шлема... https://twitter.com/OMON_Moscow Обратная связь: omon_moscow@proton.me
Created30 August 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/omonmoscow

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@omonmoscow/4684 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 10:22 UTC@brosok_mangusta_Z/890930 Jul 2026, 10:22 UTC1.00under a minute
@brosok_mangusta_Z/89164 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC@omonmoscow/4690 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@brosok_mangusta_Z6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (60)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @omonmoscow — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9,4449,4569,4506 August 2026 — 9,456 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,456 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,454 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,448 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,444 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,442–9,458 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:239,444-4
9 Aug 2026, 08:219,448-6
6 Aug 2026, 14:509,454-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:509,456no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:339,456first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.73%
avg views ÷ 9,444 subscribers
Avg views / post
352
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held12 (24 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total4,222
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,550
Videos
1,220
Links
1,840

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 43s
Average length
8m 43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC168 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @hackbereginiVideo

Наши документы о сотрудничестве НАТО с украинскими спецслужбами вызвали большой интерес. Информация об этом попала даже на телевидение. Журналисты «Вестей» сделали прекрасный репортаж и даже показали фотографию представителя Североатлантического Альянса Барта Де Вахтера. Мы тоже дали комментарии для этой новости. Полностью программу «Вести в 20.00» можно посмотреть на платформе «Смотрим». Мы знаем, что представител

7 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC253 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @hackbereginiPhoto

Сегодня мы продолжим рассказывать о том, как НАТО взаимодействует с украинскими спецслужбами. Североатлантический Альянс занимается и другими интересными вещами, кроме проведения совместных мероприятий по действиям Сил специальных операций НАТО в море, а также предоставлении СБУ развединформации и ведению гибридных войн. Например, представители Украины принимают участие в конференции национальных директоров по воор

6 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC245 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @hackbereginiPhoto

Помните, в начале июля украинские БПЛА атаковали нефтяные терминалы в Ленинградской области? А знаете ли вы, кто дает им их точные координаты, данные по загрузке и прочие непубличные вещи? Кто науськивает Украину на террор в Калининградской области? Сегодня мы вам покажем документы и переписку, которые многое прояснят. И покажем одного очень интересного человека. Итак, знакомьтесь: Барт Де Вахтер (Bart De Wachter) -

5 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC305 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @hackbereginiPhoto

Мы давно следим за СБУ, ВСУ и знаем в каких делишках НАТО они участвуют. Знаем, что скрывается под разными натовскими сборищами-конференциями. Например, пиратами НАТО стало модно захватывать гражданские суда. А знаете, что в этом тоже есть украинский след. Вот и документ, подтверждающий участие представителей Украины в 5-й ежегодной конференции НАТО по морским силам специальных операций (NATO Maritime SOF Conference

4 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC343 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @hackbereginiPhoto

Позавчера все настоящие десантники отмечали День ВДВ. По улицам ходили ребята в тельняшках и голубых беретах. Везде, кроме Украины. Потому, что в Украине десантники предали наследие Василия Маргелова. Предали голубой берет и стали манкуртами. Они сами не поняли как превратились из элитной крылатой пехоты в самые обычные общевойсковые подразделения. Это произошло не сразу, сначала украинские ВДВ переименовали в десан

1 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC≈431 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Николай Иванович Кузнецов, родившийся 27 июля 1911 года, считается одним из самых известных советских разведчиков периода Великой Отечественной войны. Благодаря блестящему знанию немецкого языка, умению перевоплощаться и выдающимся личным качествам он стал одним из самых результативных сотрудников советской разведки, действовавших в тылу противника. До войны Кузнецов работал на различных должностях, а затем был прив

1 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈296 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @MedvedevVesti

У нашего врага, у Запада, бывшая Украина лишь инструмент, заточка дьявола, Москва это реально цель номер один. Фетиш. Надо попасть по Москве любой ценой. Вот хоть как. Уже даже авторитетные на бывшей Украине военблогеры, вроде Касьянова пишут, что на удары по Москве тратят миллиарды долларов без видимого эффекта. А эффект им очень нужен. Пиар. Москвп это же не просто политическая столица. Центр логистики, промышлен

30 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC≈426 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @russian_airborneVideo

Две недели под носом у врага: как два псковских десантника предрешили исход штурма Шевченко Пока основные силы группировки «Центр» только готовились к штурму поселка, два бойца спецназа ВДВ уже находились внутри населенного пункта. Разведчики совершили невозможное: незаметно преодолели 20 километров сложнейшей территории, просочились через три противотанковых рва и пять рядов колючей проволоки. Разведчики провели в

30 Jul 2026, 10:22 UTC≈346 viewsread 6 August 2026
File

Мы уже рассказывали о том, как в минобороны Украины внедряли дорогую западную SAP-систему для управления армией. В январе там отчитались, что процесс запущен и работает. В нее загнать всё: склады, БПЛА, закупки, ремонты, деньги и снабжение 1000 частей. У нас есть презентация, которая показывает как на картинке все идеально и красиво. Меньше бумаги, быстрее выдача дронов, полный контроль в реальном времени. Но там не

28 Jul 2026, 18:47 UTC≈483 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

По линии МОО Вече еще одно подразделение, выполняющее задачи в зоне проведения СВО, получило гуманитарную помощь в виде продуктов питания, медикаментов, маскировочных сетей, а также другого нужного имущества. Выражаем искреннюю благодарность нашим подписчикам, а также всем, кто поддерживает нашу работу не только рублём, но и репостом. Вместе мы Сила! Враг будут разбит. Победа будет за нами!!! 🔻 РЕКВИЗИТЫ ДЛЯ ОКА

28 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC≈394 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В компьютерах украинского Генштаба мы нашли два очень интересных письма польской оборонной компании MISTA Sp. z o.o. Эта компания выполняла капитальный ремонт БТР-70Ді для Украины. Документы были направлены в «Спецтехноэкспорт» и Командование Сил логистики ВСУ в январе 2024 года. MISTA уже ремонтировали и модернизировали бронетехнику для Украины. Но в этот раз что-то пошло не так и испытания провалились. Из документ

24 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTC≈532 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @tacticalmedicinecoursesPhoto

⚡️ Друзья, хочу напомнить Вам, что до выхода книги осталось чуть меньше месяца и у вас есть уникальная возможность оформить предзаказ по приемлемой цене на официальном сайте издательства «Яуза». Книга максимально подробно описывает алгоритмы оказания помощи как на поле боя, так и в гражданской жизни в условиях ЧС. Успей заказать книгу прямо сейчас! 🛒 Оформить предзаказ: https://yauzashop.ru/product/takticheskaya-m

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @omonmoscow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 283,771 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OMON Moscow” (@omonmoscow), 9,444 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/omonmoscow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.