Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Daily War Z

Channel

Daily War Z

@DailyWar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,710subscribers

-181 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001111961621
TypeChannel
Username@DailyWar
Created23 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/DailyWar

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,7106,8916,800.55 August 2026 — 6,891 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,891 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,887 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,885 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,879 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,866 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,858 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,851 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,847 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,837 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,831 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,822 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,817 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,808 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,791 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,771 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,759 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,752 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,747 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,742 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,738 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,731 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,722 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,718 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,715 subscribers10 November 2026 — 6,710 subscribers5 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net -181. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,683–6,918 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 03:476,710-5
3 Nov 2026, 11:116,715-3
31 Oct 2026, 08:366,718-4
28 Oct 2026, 14:376,722-9
25 Oct 2026, 06:186,731-7
22 Oct 2026, 00:076,738-4
18 Oct 2026, 09:486,742-5
15 Oct 2026, 16:366,747-5
12 Oct 2026, 13:166,752-7
5 Oct 2026, 11:386,759-12
27 Sept 2026, 01:596,771-20
18 Sept 2026, 00:416,791-17
13 Sept 2026, 23:406,808-9
10 Sept 2026, 05:386,817-5
5 Sept 2026, 09:566,822-9
1 Sept 2026, 11:286,831-6
29 Aug 2026, 08:246,837-10
26 Aug 2026, 11:436,847-4
23 Aug 2026, 19:376,851-7
20 Aug 2026, 01:376,858first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 14 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.90%
avg views ÷ 6,710 subscribers
Avg views / post
396
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.758%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held17 (14 August 2025 – 26 October 2026)
Views total396
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 15:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18m 57s
Average length
2m 42s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

282 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6422.7%
👍5619.9%
🔥3311.7%
😁3311.7%
🤬3111.0%
😡155.32%
👏144.96%
🙏113.90%
💯82.84%
🤩62.13%
🫡41.42%
👀20.709%
👎20.709%
👌10.355%
😭10.355%
🤝10.355%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 282 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2025 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

26 Oct 2026, 08:36 UTC396 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @okspnPhoto

🪖24 года назад, рано утром 26 октября 2002 года, боевые группы Управлений «А» и «В» Центра специального назначения ФСБ приступили к операции в захваченном боевиками театральном центре на Дубровке в Москве («Норд-Ост»). В районе пяти утра в здание центра начал поступать усыпляющий газ. Еще через час, около 6 утра, сотрудники «Альфы» и «Вымпела» разными маршрутами начинают проникать в здание, одними из первых заходят …

❤3

14 Sept 2026, 10:52 UTC≈1,200 views13 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Террористы умирают — канал DW воскресает

👏12👍1

14 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC≈1,070 views17 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @directorate4Photo

На Украине ликвидирован известный террорист. Речь идет об уроженце Чечни Хаважи Хасановиче Амаеве, также известном как Зумсо Шишани, Абу-Дауд и Абу Таур. Его тело с множественными колото-резаными ранами было обнаружено в квартире. По подозрению в убийстве был задержан проживавший с ним гражданин Украины. Не исключено, что мотивом преступления могли стать любовные отношения. Амаев был настоящим ветераном джихада. С …

👍12🔥4❤1

28 Aug 2025, 08:58 UTC≈5,810 views24 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @rybar

📝Горящие НПЗ: что делать📝 Все возможности борьбы с БЛА, и пенять на бюрократию — глупо Хотя тема пути защиты НПЗ неоднократно поднималась еще во время прошлогодних ударов по данным объектам, как несложно заметить, с мертвой точки дело не сдвинулось: заводы по-прежнему горят от тихоходных беспилотников, сбиваемых даже с ружья. Раз уж с другими мерами не срослось, подскажем еще одну очевидную вещь. В стране масса Ми-…

👍17❤7

28 Aug 2025, 08:56 UTC≈3,700 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @bayraktar1070

Смотрю на удары украинских тихоходных БПЛА по нашим НПЗ. В моем лексиконе нет цензурных слов для того, чтобы описать ситуацию. Но больше всего меня поражает, что даже после десятков подобных "падений обломков" никто публично не был арестован и отправлен в казематы за полную профнепригодность в условиях военного времени. Все средства противодействия украинским БПЛА у нас имеются. Однако, нет системы и страха за прова…

🤬16👏2💯1

24 Aug 2025, 16:49 UTC≈3,870 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @brussinf

📌Недавно жил два дня на ПВД одной из добровольческих бригад Парни сделали «Аллею памяти» в виде большого стенда на улице с фотографиями погибших бойцов. Подхожу к нему рано утром, а возле «Аллеи» стоят ребята с большой стопкой фотоснимков. - Мужики, новых вешаете? - Да не, мы старые обновляем, выцвели уже на таком солнце. Ответ меня, честно, пробил до глубины души. Эта история про уважение к павшим. Не искусствен…

❤21🤝1

20 Aug 2025, 11:32 UTC≈3,370 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @brussinf

📌Важно. Обстановка в Константиновке (ДНР) Мой источник в городе сообщил, что наши войска уже контролируют местность в районе «южного поста ГАИ со стороны Донецка». Так же российские ДРГ уже свободно перемещаются по городскому микрорайону «Южный», заходят к местным домой, спрашивают «как дела». То есть у нас есть значительные успехи на этом направлении. Также источник сообщил, что последние три дня очень сильно акт…

🙏9🔥5

20 Aug 2025, 10:10 UTC≈4,120 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Украинские ССОшники-диверсанты на привале в Брянской области. Гости встречены максимального горячо 🛡️

🔥14😁2👎1🤬1

19 Aug 2025, 14:41 UTC≈2,480 views35 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @vysokygovoritPhoto

Вчера хохлы решили показать Трампу, что они потужные и могут провести диверсию в глубине территории России. Завели ДРГ на территорию Брянской области, шли лесами, но СОБР и ФСБ крепко знают свое дело. Троих хохлов в коротком боестолкновении убили, троих, в том числе командира, капитана ССО Украины взяли в плен, причем командир сам лег на животик и поднял ручки, как только началась стрельба. ДРГ тащила с собой взрывч…

👍26🔥6❤2👎1

18 Aug 2025, 08:46 UTC≈2,840 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @infomil_liveVideo

Мы живём в мире какой-то пост-иронии... Бойцы ВС РФ используют бронетранспортёр М113 в ходе штурмовых действий на Запорожском направлении. Всё бы ничего, однако машина украшена флагами РФ и США. Осведомитель

😁13👌1

18 Aug 2025, 06:06 UTC≈3,060 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

🛡️Сотрудники ФСБ предотвратили теракт на Крымском мосту. В очередной раз в роли террориста Украина. Автомашина с самодельным взрывным устройством большой мощности прибыла в Россию с Украины транзитом через ряд стран. Пересекла российско-грузинскую границу в международном пункте пропуска "Верхний Ларс" в Республике Северная Осетия - Алания, и должна была проследовать в Краснодарский край По информации ведомства, впо…

🤬12🫡4🙏2

15 Aug 2025, 19:15 UTC≈3,280 views20 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Рапортует, видимо)

😁17❤2💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @DailyWar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Daily War Z” (@DailyWar), 6,710 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DailyWar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.