Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dev Easy Notes

Channel

Dev Easy Notes

@dev_easy_notes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,911subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001222348321
TypeChannel
Username@dev_easy_notes
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dev_easy_notes

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,9112,9322,921.57 August 2026 — 2,932 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,932 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,930 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,932 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,928 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,930 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,929 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,926 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,924 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,923 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,922 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,921 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,918 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,913 subscribers26 September 2026 — 2,911 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 51 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,908–2,935 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 23:212,911-2
18 Sept 2026, 06:162,913-5
14 Sept 2026, 09:172,918-3
10 Sept 2026, 13:372,921-1
4 Sept 2026, 23:582,922-1
1 Sept 2026, 08:032,923-1
29 Aug 2026, 06:462,924-2
26 Aug 2026, 03:232,926-3
19 Aug 2026, 15:082,929-1
16 Aug 2026, 20:372,930+2
13 Aug 2026, 17:362,928-4
10 Aug 2026, 17:332,932+2
7 Aug 2026, 21:372,930-2
7 Aug 2026, 10:012,932no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:582,932first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,007 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡43543.2%
😁13613.5%
custom 540026290039895618510110.0%
custom 5456198114920636118848.34%
🔥838.24%
❤797.85%
🗿302.98%
custom 5381945367392690618232.28%
🥰171.69%
🤔121.19%
custom 539994902418896618540.397%
💩30.298%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,007 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
263
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
110
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dev_easy_notes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 March 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC978 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Короче, поясню, я давно ничего не пишу, потому что заебался) возможно я скоро вернусь, как только пойму о чем писать помимо эяй, про который сейчас пишет каждый первый. При этом меня заебали боты с ебучими книгами, а лучшая защита от ботов, это пэйвол. Поэтому я тупо сделаю сообщения платными пока не перестану лениться и подключу уже нормальный фильтр

custom 54002629003989561857❤6🗿6

4 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTCviews —34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😁17custom 540026290039895618517

17 Apr 2026, 17:27 UTC≈3,180 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Меня вот что еще дико бесит, через год я буду уже как 10 лет в индустрии и все равно, каждый сука год я напарываюсь на одну и туже херабору. Ты делаешь проект, используешь хорошие как тебе кажется практики, нейронкой генеришь целые модули, пытаешься сделать все красиво, чтобы решить конкретную задачу. И только когда уже закончил натыкаешься на решение, используя которое ты мог не делать 90% работы, при этом оно еще …

custom 545619811492063611836❤14🥰10🔥1

15 Apr 2026, 08:25 UTC≈2,990 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁14custom 54561981149206361189🤔3❤1custom 54002629003989561851

9 Apr 2026, 11:01 UTC≈3,240 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как оценить работу модели? Часто вижу высказывания в стиле: вот новый клод стал тупее, или сжатие контекста работает плохо или так себе удерживается контекст. Я всегда задаюсь вопросом а как вы это поняли? Как ты понял, что новая версия модели стала работать хуже, или что контекст стал удерживаться не так как раньше? В идеале чтобы это понимать у тебя должен быть свой бенчмарк на это. Желательно прям на задачи кото…

custom 54002629003989561858❤7custom 53999490241889661853🤔2

9 Apr 2026, 07:25 UTC≈2,720 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я понимаю когда бывшие разрабы начинают развлекаться с нейронками и создавать какие-то инструменты, которые помогают в работе, но как в этой тусовке оказались звезды? PewDiePie строит у себя дома мини-датацентр на котором гоняет локальные языковые модели. Мила Йовович с другом сделала систему для памяти агентов и зашарила ее на github. Репозиторий за пару суток набрал более 7к звезд. Как там ваши репозитории поживаю…

😁18🔥2❤1🗿1🤔1

8 Apr 2026, 07:28 UTC≈2,250 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Unix Way Вы делаете какую-то CLI программу или скрипт, который(ая) например генерирует залупу какой-то отчет по вашему коду. Далее этот отчет нужно отправить в какой-то рабочий чат. Как правильно сделать такую задачу? Есть два путя. Первый это прикрутить отправку в чат в сам CLI, чтобы прога сама отправляла куда нужно. Второй это мы не выебываемся и делаем CLI который только генерит отчет, а отправку делаем другим …

❤10custom 54561981149206361186🔥1

7 Apr 2026, 11:34 UTC≈1,800 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥32🗿4

31 Mar 2026, 16:20 UTC≈2,330 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nikitonsky_pub

Шопился вчера в интернет-магазине, который ставил на колени мой старенький дохленький десятиядерный M4 Pro. Шутка ли — семь мегабайт джаваскрипта на каждой загрузке страницы. Нам ведь обещали что? Загрузишь такую байду один раз, зато потом можно за час долететь. А на деле получается: открыл я новую вкладку — пошел нафиг. Нажал кнопку назад — пошел нафиг. Поискал по истории и достал страницу, на которой уже был — пош…

custom 540026290039895618513❤7😁3

31 Mar 2026, 14:09 UTC≈2,110 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Web1.0 Web2.0 Web3.0 В начале 2000-х интернет был в некотором смысле гораздо более децентрализованный. У многих был личный сайт/блог на какой-нибудь CMS или своем хостинге. Форумы были разбросаны по всему интернету, не было одной точки входа. Чтобы что-то найти, нужно было прям искать, эдакий аналог закрытого клуба. Если тебя не пригласили то ты скорее всего так и не узнаешь о существовании этого сайта/блога и т.д. …

custom 54561981149206361187🔥4🤔1

30 Mar 2026, 10:26 UTC≈1,860 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Все же слышали что AI сейчас очень сильно меняет профессию разработчика, сейчас покажу как это происходит. Раньше: – Фронтенд: идем в бэк, получаем json, рисуем списочки и красим кнопки – Бэкенд: получаем запрос, идем в БД получаем данные, делаем json отдаем клиенту Сейчас: – Фронтенд: идем в бэк, получаем json, рисуем списочки и красим кнопки – Бэкенд: получаем запрос, идем в LLM получаем json, отдаем его клиенту

😁43❤1🤔1🥰1

30 Mar 2026, 09:53 UTC≈1,720 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну что, те кто хотел сделали каминг аут, поэтому давайте двигаться дальше. Что такое RAG? RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) – переводится букально как генерация с дополнением извлечением. Чего извлекается, дополняется и генерируется давайте раскидаем. Самая дефолтная задача для RAG это сделать ИИ бота который например отвечает по документации вашего продукта. Базовая LLM очень хорошо умеет работать с текстом, в…

🔥21❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dev_easy_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Telegram Contests
@contest · 299,042
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dev Easy Notes” (@dev_easy_notes), 2,911 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dev_easy_notes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.