Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Учебный Центр «Опасный Бизнес»

Channel

Учебный Центр «Опасный Бизнес»

@ob_center

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,026subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002858167454
TypeChannel
Username@ob_center
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ob_center

Growth

1,0191,0261,022.56 August 2026 — 1,019 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,021 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,021 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,024 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,025 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,026 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 11 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,018–1,027 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:261,026+1
13 Aug 2026, 01:361,025+1
9 Aug 2026, 16:221,024+3
6 Aug 2026, 13:051,021no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:311,021+2
6 Aug 2026, 01:351,019first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 28 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
533.3%
avg views ÷ 1,026 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,470
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.174%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held17 (28 February 202631 July 2026)
Views total21,886
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

332 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥17452.4%
👍13139.5%
🤯72.11%
😁61.81%
51.51%
😭51.51%
🍓20.602%
10.301%
🗿10.301%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 332reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 13:15 UTC250 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @OpasniyBiznes

Друзья, по техническим причинам наше мероприятие в парке переносится на воскресенье - 2 августа 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

🤯7

31 Jul 2026, 13:15 UTC254 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @OpasniyBiznesPhoto

Найти нас можно будет тут 🔫

👍6

31 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC282 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @OpasniyBiznesVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍11🔥7

30 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈21,100 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌏🍉⛵️🪡🌞🧈 🦏🍉 🛞🦆🌹🌞 🔴Начальный курс по Тактической Медицине: 08-09 августа | Омск | Инструктор Дмитрий «Матрос» На курсе изучаются базовые принципы оказания помощи при огневом контакте, а также в тактической обстановке: - осмотр раненых - остановка массивных кровотечений и обеспечение проходимости дыхательных путей - борьба с пневмотораксом и предупреждение гипотермии - эвакуация раненых с поля боя и многое другое ❗

🔥7

8 May 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,120 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @OpasniyBiznesVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥37👍4

11 Apr 2026, 06:23 UTC≈1,660 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @naukapobezhdatZVideo

Поспешишь — людей без конечности оставишь. Вот вам «замечательное» видео (противника), как бойцу просто так руку ампутировали. Почему? Потому что жгут наложен ниже ранения (а ранение в плечо). Таким образом, боец «вытекал», а жгут не помогал. Но как так получилось? Сейчас расскажем. Алгоритм. Многие, увидев красную штанину или рукав, сразу высоко накладывают жгут и считают, что «дело в шляпе», кровотечение остановл

👍17

9 Apr 2026, 07:16 UTC≈22,300 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Самый большой подвиг на войне - просто каждый день качественно выполнять свои обязанности от начала и до конца. Знать, что вы сегодня сделали все. И завтра тоже сделаете. Не важно, штурмовик вы или номер расчета Д-30. Но, если придет время, станьте теми, о ком будут слагать легенды, а не теми, над кем будет смеяться противник, смотря на экран трансляции с дрона Делай, что должен - и будь, что будет

👍15🔥4

9 Apr 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,230 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @tacmedproPhoto

Боец, 25 лет, прилет FPV-дрона с кумулятивным снарядом, частичный открыв верхней конечности, слепые осколочные ранения левой лопатки. При выполнении боевой задачи был без шлема. После получения ранения наложил турникет ближе к отрыву конечности, но при закручивании сломался вороток. Решил наложить жгут, однако осколки в районе лопатки мешали наложить жгут. Раненый принял решение привязать один конец жгута за ветку.

👍31🔥20

9 Apr 2026, 04:53 UTC≈21,000 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Дьявол - в деталях Сбор материальной базы – долгое и кропотливое занятие. Иногда бывает, мина есть, взрывателя - нет. Или есть взрыватель, но нет предохранительной скобы. Медленно, но верно, наша материальная база по инженерному делу расширяется, и в этот летний сезон мы запустим базовую инженерную подготовку. А что за приблуда справа, кто знает?

🔥12👍1

6 Apr 2026, 15:37 UTC863 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @OpasniyBiznesVideo

Без базы никуда Вначале было слово, и слово это было «изготовка для стрельбы стоя». Допустив пробел на этом моменте, дальше все может пойти по одному месту, ибо рано или поздно все красные нити приведут сюда. Поэтому очень нужен нормальный индивидуальный подход. На записи фрамент со вчерашних занятий, на котором присутствовал человек, только начинающий постигать непостижимое. Так как формат занятий групповой, и чел

🔥11👍2

31 Mar 2026, 08:01 UTC≈25,000 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Фрагменты полевых занятий по знакомству с направленными минами Страшные кадры, Матрос получил ранение руки, не совместимое со скроллингом Тик-Токов, 18+

👍16🔥6😁2

31 Mar 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,370 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Час не буду репостить в основную группу, чтобы те, кто подписаны на этот канал успели записаться

🔥12

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ob_center. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 554,188 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Учебный Центр «Опасный Бизнес»” (@ob_center), 1,026 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ob_center.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.