Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Искусство для пацанчиков

@nastya4che

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,910subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001164481917
TypeChannel
Username@nastya4che
DescriptionПодкаст ”Искусство для пацанчиков”: про art без снобизма. https://podcast.ru/1371397676 Коммерческие предложения: @vysotskayamaria Лекции и выступления: @feofaniia Inst,Fb,Vk,Tw: nastya4che Перечень РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=677a7c7e4e740947b
Created3 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nastya4che

Growth

21,91021,93621,9236 August 2026 — 21,936 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,926 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,920 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,917 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,912 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,911 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,910 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 8 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,906–21,940 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:5721,910-1
13 Aug 2026, 02:2321,911-1
11 Aug 2026, 03:3321,912-5
10 Aug 2026, 05:4021,917-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:1321,920-6
7 Aug 2026, 01:0621,926-10
6 Aug 2026, 02:0521,936first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.86%
avg views ÷ 21,910 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,500
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held22 (31 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total33,046
Reactions total476
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,660
Videos
505
Links
1,190

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 31s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

399 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20451.1%
🔥8220.6%
👍369.02%
🤬246.02%
❤‍🔥184.51%
😍123.01%
👀92.26%
🤩41.00%
👎20.501%
💋20.501%
🤗20.501%
🆒10.251%
💔10.251%
💘10.251%
😁10.251%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 476reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC431 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

В некотором царстве, в некотором государстве жили были творческие да талантливые и было у них много классных идей, да и тревог хватало. Задумались они, как теперь до людей достучишься, да и вспомнили про шутов и сказочки их. Кто понял, тот понял, а кто посмеятся пришел, так с того и спроса нет, а кто плюнул на сцену и ушел восвояси неэстетским зрелищем, так и скатертью ему дорога. Хорошая штука кодирование. И я там

7💔1

Signed Nastya Chetverikova

14 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC558 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Posted without readable text

6🔥2

Signed Nastya Chetverikova

14 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC708 views11 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Челябиииинск!!! Привет! Третий год уже приезжайю выступать и общаться на арт-фестиваль Неискусственно! В 17:00 завтра буду читать лекцию про «Совриск на карте городов!» Соскучилась! До встречи!

11

Signed Nastya Chetverikova

14 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC719 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥4🆒1

Signed Nastya Chetverikova

12 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈1,520 views54 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Массовая смена логотипов музеев))) ГМИИ поменял, теперь черед МАММ. К 30-летию Мультимедиа Арт Музей сделали глобальный ремонт, открыли крышу с «Садом культур» совместно с Shakirova studio и сменили лого, который: 1. суперстильный, 2. сопровождается крутым предметным дизайном, (надеюсь, что в будущем это можно будет купить, пока можно разглядеть на -1), 3. полон смыслов: это и «МАММа - первое слово», и кардиограмма

28🔥22🤩4

Signed Nastya Chetverikova

11 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC≈1,780 views44 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @saygoosegoosePhoto

Фрида Кало побеждает боль, а Такаси Мураками рисует монстров — в новых лекциях курса о детстве знаменитых художников «Великая песочница» 🩻🍄🌼 Они вышли сегодня в аудиоприложении «Гусьгусь»! Культуролог и музыковед Настя Четверикова рассказывает, как Фрида Кало стала художницей, несмотря на болезни и травмы, и почему писала так много автопортретов. А еще — как Такаси Мураками построил фабрику современного искусства из

🔥19❤‍🔥12👀94

Signed Nastya Chetverikova

8 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC≈2,040 views22 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

20💋2

Signed Nastya Chetverikova

8 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC≈2,190 views40 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Автор свежепереведенной книги от Ad marginem про Дадаизм профессор Кёльнского университета Мартин Миттельмайер утверждает: мы живем в эпоху победившего дадаизма. Он видит «прикладной дадаизм» в шортсформатах как в коллажах, которые любили дадаисты (ведь это буквально цифровые куски информации, часто совершенно абсурдной), цифровой шум - бесконечный коллаж, бессодержательный лепет и хаотично наскоро выраженные обрывк

👍259❤‍🔥6

Signed Nastya Chetverikova

7 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC≈1,870 views46 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @yamyamkidsVideo

Наша добрая подруга Настя Четверикова, культуролог и автор подкаста «Искусство для пацанчиков», запустила новый проект — на этот раз в детском аудиоприложении «Гусьгусь». Курс называется «Великая песочница. Каким было детство знаменитых художников». Это 10 лекций для всех юнисков и вечно юных искусствоведов, в которых Настя рассказывает, какими детьми были великие художники: «Я придумывала этот проект как подкаст о

28🔥9👍8💘1

Signed Nastya Chetverikova

7 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC≈1,620 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Мы с Юным Искусствоведом напоминаем про «Великую песочницу»!!!

10

Signed Nastya Chetverikova

6 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC≈2,030 views24 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Осторожно: мошенники!

🤬24

Signed Nastya Chetverikova

6 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC≈1,820 views14 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

12🤗2

Signed Nastya Chetverikova

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @nastya4che. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 9,166 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Искусство для пацанчиков” (@nastya4che), 21,910 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastya4che.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.