Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MT.today | Новости и Обзоры

Channel

MT.today | Новости и Обзоры

@mobiltelefonru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

43,589subscribers

-119 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001140367605
TypeChannel
Username@mobiltelefonru
Created18 July 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mobiltelefonru

Growth

43,58943,71643,652.56 August 2026 — 43,708 subscribers6 August 2026 — 43,716 subscribers7 August 2026 — 43,691 subscribers8 August 2026 — 43,689 subscribers9 August 2026 — 43,673 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43,656 subscribers11 August 2026 — 43,651 subscribers12 August 2026 — 43,664 subscribers14 August 2026 — 43,654 subscribers15 August 2026 — 43,635 subscribers17 August 2026 — 43,629 subscribers18 August 2026 — 43,602 subscribers19 August 2026 — 43,589 subscribers6 August 202619 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 13 days, net -119. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,570–43,735 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 03:5543,589-13
18 Aug 2026, 07:1243,602-27
17 Aug 2026, 09:5743,629-6
15 Aug 2026, 19:3643,635-19
14 Aug 2026, 08:0443,654-10
12 Aug 2026, 23:2643,664+13
11 Aug 2026, 20:1343,651-5
10 Aug 2026, 21:5743,656-17
9 Aug 2026, 21:5243,673-16
8 Aug 2026, 20:3143,689-2
7 Aug 2026, 17:3343,691-25
6 Aug 2026, 14:0143,716+8
6 Aug 2026, 03:3143,708first reading

Engagement

170 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 43,589 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,960
170 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.961%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
170
of 170 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held170 (5 August 202618 August 2026)
Views total1,013,390
Reactions total9,743
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 00:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,003 reactions across 150 posts, in 61 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,52717.0%
😁1,36815.2%
🤣1,15512.8%
90110.0%
🔥5375.96%
🤮4595.10%
🌚2622.91%
👀2552.83%
👌1982.20%
🤝1521.69%
🤔1511.68%
🤯1321.47%
😢1211.34%
🍌1171.30%
💊1161.29%
👏1151.28%
🤷‍♂1091.21%
🗿1051.17%
🤬1021.13%
🥱961.07%
41 further kinds1,02511.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 170 of the 170 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,743reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 170 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mobiltelefonru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 170 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈2,070 views22 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Анонс Xiaomi Redmi M100: бюджетная новинка в Китае Xiaomi очень хотела нас запутать, но мы не поддались! Подробнее: mt.today/!ly5zjt

😁14👍32🍌1🔥1🗿1

18 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC≈2,150 views19 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Анонс Honor Pad 20 5G и Honor Pad 20 Pro: мощные IPS-планшеты с симкой Парочка интересных планшетов на базе Honor Pad 20, вышедшего в Китае ещё в мае. Подробнее: mt.today/!4n5zjt

10👍5🌚2🍌1🔥1

18 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈1,910 views20 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @evgenmtPhoto

🔥Зачем планшету бумажный экран? Обзор Honor Pad X9b Max Paperlike🔥 📱 смотреть на YouTube 🌍 смотреть на ВКонтакте - матовый экран - 4 динамика - процессор Snapdragon - чехол-клавиатура в комплекте - MagicOS 10 с Android 16 - поддержка microSD ... и многое другое!

10😐5👍3🍌1🗿1

18 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC≈2,800 views27 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Анонс Fairphone 6+: приятный апгрейд за 50 евро Смартфон с возможностями лёгкого ремонта и обновлениями до 2033 года стал чуточку лучше. Подробнее: mt.today/!940zjt

🌚14👍62🥱2🍌1🗿1😁1

18 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC≈2,920 views29 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Анонс iQOO Z11S: долгожитель на редком железе 10 000 мАч в защищённом корпусе, 144-Гц экран и другие фишки Подробнее: mt.today/!dryyjt

👍22😁5🍌1🗿1

18 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC≈17,000 views70 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

restore:: половина россиян с iPhone хотят купить Android-смартфон Крупнейшая сеть «яблочных» магазинов опросила своих клиентов и получила немало интересных результатов. Подробнее: mt.today/!udyyjt

👏45💊8👍7🤯4🍌3🥱21

18 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC≈3,380 views47 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Анонс iQOO Neo 11 Ultra – заявка на хит с новым Dimensity 9500M Ну а к ценникам уже пора начинать привыкать. Таковы новые реалии. Подробнее: mt.today/!pmsyjt

🫡33😁6👀3🗿2🍌1👍1😍1

18 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC≈3,460 views47 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE распаковали на видео до анонса: что известно? Сразу два блогера устроили корейцам фальстарт. Подробнее: mt.today/!3jqyjt

🫡25😁9🤮5🥴3👍2🍌1🔥1🥱1

18 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈3,510 views45 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

ВИДЕО: обзор Tecno Pova 8 и 8 Pro – очень разные ответы на Nothing Phone - Мам, купи Nothing! - Нет, у нас есть Nothing дома. Подробнее: mt.today/!mlnyjt

🤮38👍4🌚1🍌1🙉1

18 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈3,640 views42 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

CMF Buds Neo станут следующей новинкой Nothing Компания раскрыла дизайн и дату презентации. Подробнее: mt.today/!43kyjt

😴24👌4🕊3🤮32🌚2💊2🍌1

18 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC≈3,600 views36 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

ВИДЕО: обзор Honor MagicBook 16 2026 за минуту О самом главном для тех, кому некогда смотреть обзор. Подробнее: mt.today/!d9iyjt

👍22🔥6❤‍🔥3😴2🍌1🎃1🖕1

18 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC≈3,530 views31 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Уточнённые сроки выхода базового Xiaomi 18 Компания решила не рисковать и дистанцироваться от iPhone 18. Подробнее: mt.today/!94hyjt

18👍7🔥2🌚1🍌1🤮1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 170 posts we hold for @mobiltelefonru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTCAnonymous Poll5,990 voters approx.

Как вы относитесь к удалению приложений из App Store?

  1. С пониманием18%
  2. Испытываю недоверие к Apple8%
  3. Не стану рассматривать iPhone при следующей покупке17%
  4. Ограничения подталкивают к переходу на Android14%
  5. Я пользуюсь Android68%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 12,791 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ЧЕСТНЫЙ БЛОГ
@chestniyblog · 79,673
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
Хмурчик Technology
@khmrchk · 108,036
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
realme Россия
@realmerussia · 99,177
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 15 August 2026
808
@rbtshki · 202,793
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
Lifegoodd
@lifegoodd1 · 166,770
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 August 2026
Technodeus
@technodeus2023 · 104,464
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 August 2026
Droider
@droidergram · 104,463
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
XTB
@XTN_channel · 86,958
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 August 2026
GWM | HAVAL Россия
@HavalRussiaOfficial · 92,320
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 17 August 2026
Samsung Russia
@SamsungRussia · 140,191
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MT.today | Новости и Обзоры” (@mobiltelefonru), 43,589 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mobiltelefonru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.