Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 52 days, net +1,089. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,729–30,783 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 13:40
30,315
+3,118
17 Sept 2026, 14:20
27,197
-38
15 Sept 2026, 13:56
27,235
-31
13 Sept 2026, 19:54
27,266
-81
12 Sept 2026, 02:57
27,347
-69
9 Sept 2026, 21:39
27,416
-138
6 Sept 2026, 15:17
27,554
-63
4 Sept 2026, 02:15
27,617
-98
2 Sept 2026, 15:05
27,715
-65
1 Sept 2026, 13:25
27,780
-87
31 Aug 2026, 11:53
27,867
-83
30 Aug 2026, 14:15
27,950
-166
29 Aug 2026, 10:45
28,116
-140
28 Aug 2026, 10:57
28,256
-150
27 Aug 2026, 12:18
28,406
+306
26 Aug 2026, 10:32
28,100
+164
25 Aug 2026, 09:36
27,936
+27
24 Aug 2026, 06:07
27,909
-64
22 Aug 2026, 13:53
27,973
-86
21 Aug 2026, 06:15
28,059
first reading
Engagement
73 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 30,315 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,320
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 73 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held
73 (25 July 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total
112,928
Reactions total
3,168
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 20:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
988
Videos
188
Links
92
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
8m 27s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,062 reactions across 73 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,851
40.4%
🔥
1,452
20.6%
👍
1,363
19.3%
❤🔥
343
4.86%
⚡
238
3.37%
🎉
148
2.10%
🏆
132
1.87%
👏
107
1.52%
😁
77
1.09%
🍌
57
0.807%
😍
50
0.708%
🤣
26
0.368%
👌
25
0.354%
👾
25
0.354%
🤯
25
0.354%
🦄
25
0.354%
🌭
21
0.297%
👀
15
0.212%
😈
13
0.184%
🆒
12
0.17%
9 further kinds
57
0.807%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,062 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 73 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @XiaomiSpace. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 73 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Напоминаем: у нас проходит розыгрыш топовой модели новой серии REDMI Note! 🎁
В ней всё лучшее от новой линейки:
🔋 Аккумулятор 10000 мАч и быстрая зарядка HyperCharge 100 Вт — сверхбольшой запас энергии и быстрая зарядка.
🛡 Титаническая прочность — защита IP69/IP69K и стекло Gorilla Glass Victus 2.
✨ Яркий и плавный экран для любимых видео, игр и общения — AMOLED-дисплей 6,83″, 1,5K, до 120 Гц.
Нажимайте на кнопку …
Вас тоже бесит, когда такое происходит? 😾
Хорошо, что серия REDMI Note 17 создана с запасом выносливости: до 3 дней работы без подзарядки и повышенная прочность для самых разных сценариев.
Распаковали REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5G в том самом "Магическом белом" 🪄✨
Это тот самый цвет корпуса, который меняется на солнце с белого на закатный розово-оранжевый. В прошлом посте рассказали, как работает эта маленькая магия, а теперь показываем поближе.
Белый или розово-оранжевый — какой нравится больше? 🤍🧡
Почему "Магический белый"? Секрет раскрывается на солнце 🤍✨
На первый взгляд REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5G в этом цвете выглядит нежно-белым. Но стоит солнечному свету попасть на заднюю панель, и она приобретает тёплый розово-оранжевый оттенок.
За превращение отвечает фотохромная технология: поверхность реагирует на свет, раскрывая новый оттенок прямо у вас в руках — словно по волшебству 🪄
REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5G — пр…
Больше заботы о вашем REDMI Note 17 🧡
При покупке смартфона серии REDMI Note 17 по 31 октября 2026 года действуют специальные условия сервиса:
🛡 24 месяца гарантии на смартфон.
📱 Одна бесплатная замена экрана в течение 6 месяцев с момента покупки.
🔋 Одна замена аккумулятора в течение 3 лет.
Пользуйтесь новинкой с дополнительной поддержкой от Xiaomi ☺️
Предложение действует на условиях программы. Подробности и по…
REDMI Note 17: больше места для любимого 🧡
Смотреть сериалы, переписываться, читать и строить планы удобнее на большом экране. В базовой модели мы собрали всё необходимое на каждый день:
🟢AMOLED-дисплей 6,99″ с частотой до 120 Гц — для плавной прокрутки и комфортного просмотра.
🟢Технологии заботы о зрении делают длительный просмотр видео, работу с приложениями и чтение более комфортными.
🟢 Аккумулятор 7700 мАч и бы…
REDMI Note 17 Pro 5G — титан качества REDMI 🤎
Более двух дней без подзарядки и защита, проверенная в лаборатории. Знакомьтесь с моделью, в которой выносливости уделили особое внимание!
🔋 Аккумулятор 8340 мАч — для работы, любимых видео и поездок.
⚡️ Быстрая зарядка HyperCharge 67 Вт — чтобы не ждать, а поскорее восполнить заряд и вернуться к своим делам.
🛡 Сертифицированная устойчивость к падениям с высоты до 3 мет…
😀REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5G. Титанический заряд. На максимум.
Именно в этой модели установлен самый ёмкий аккумулятор в истории смартфонов Xiaomi — 10 000 мАч.
Знакомьтесь с топовой моделью серии:
🔥 Колоссальные 10 000 мАч и HyperCharge 100 Вт
🟧 Процессор Snapdragon 6 Gen 5
☀️ AMOLED-дисплей 6.83″ / 1.5K / до 120 Гц с Dolby Vision.
✨ Основная камера 50 Мп с оптической стабилизацией и фронтальная 32 Мп (обе поддержив…
Серия REDMI Note 17 уже в продаже 🤎
Самое время познакомиться с моделями, выбрать свой цвет и решить, какой REDMI Note 17 станет вашим.
А если хотите сначала узнать о новинках больше, смотрите запись нашей презентации в ВК.
Титанический заряд. На максимум.
Онлайн-трансляция презентации серии REDMI Note 17 🤎
Мы в эфире! Прямо сейчас представляем новую серию смартфонов: показываем дизайн и рассказываем о главных возможностях каждой модели.
Присоединяйтесь к трансляции и делитесь впечатлениями в комментариях. Ждём вас!
🔗 Ссылка на трансляцию ВК
🔥 Выиграй новинку Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G 🔥
Разыгрываем свеженький Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G вместе с Xiaomi Россия!
Как принять участие в конкурсе:
• Подписаться на канал @evgenmt;
• Подписаться на канал @xiaomispace;
• Нажать кнопку «Участвовать» ниже.
6 октября бот автоматически выберет победителя случайным образом.
Полные правила розыгрыша тут: https://clck.ru/3RZqck
Отправка приза возможна в любую точку Ро…
🔥424❤165👍87🎉18🏆16🦄16❤🔥12
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @XiaomiSpace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
POCO Россия @POCORussiaOfficial · 58,977 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 15 September 2026
🎀 cocozabanstory 🎀 @cocozabanstory · 24,534 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Xiaomi Россия” (@XiaomiSpace), 30,315 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XiaomiSpace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.