Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SMW

@stupidmadworld

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

16,848subscribers

+136 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001322590867
TypeChannel
Username@stupidmadworld
DescriptionСамое важное о технологиях! По рекламе: @AlekNone Менеджер: @FamousFromHell Рег. номер № 7492603075
Created1 December 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stupidmadworld

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “StupidMadWorld — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

16,71217,60717,159.56 August 2026 — 16,712 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,836 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,135 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,607 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,495 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,151 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,990 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,921 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,848 subscribers16,8486 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +136. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,578–17,741 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:2616,848-73
13 Aug 2026, 06:3716,921-69
12 Aug 2026, 09:4816,990-161
11 Aug 2026, 06:3617,151-344
10 Aug 2026, 04:1117,495-112
9 Aug 2026, 01:1117,607+472
8 Aug 2026, 04:2117,135+299
7 Aug 2026, 01:0516,836+124
6 Aug 2026, 06:4516,712first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.5%
avg views ÷ 16,848 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,780
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held44 (30 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total119,380
Reactions total2,872
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 02:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,630
Videos
1,160
Links
2,760

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,872 reactions across 43 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣93032.4%
🔥82128.6%
❤‍🔥49917.4%
🤯33711.7%
🍌2859.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,872reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 43 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stupidmadworld. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC730 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Очко за апдейт года уходит в Google! Google не может ни в UX ни в UI. Теперь постоянно промахиваюсь пытаясь нажать на «подписки», зачем нужно было менять интерфейс? Вкладка «фильмы и сериалы» отдельная любовь ❤️ в 99% стран там ничего нет. Кажется настала пора прощаться с премиум и снова сидеть на модах официального приложения.

🤣27🔥9

14 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC≈1,550 views70 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Open AI троллит Meta. Почему я это читаю с индийским акцентом? 🤣

🔥52🤣18

Signed Максим Якименко

13 Aug 2026, 21:37 UTC≈1,850 views32 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Вам на ночь на подумать, когда в Казахстане отвалилась Телега на 3 часа, у меня еще два платных VPN перестали работать. Бесплатные работали, но все же, интересно получилось 😉

🤯28🍌3🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC≈1,880 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Слабонервным не смотреть Google представила приложение для отслеживания задач. Дизайн приложения выполнен в фирменном стиле. Или не выполнен. В комментах 18+ скриншот приложения Gemini на новых часах Google. Там ужас. @stupidmadworld

🤯18🤣10❤‍🔥2

13 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC≈1,850 views64 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ну сейчас как заживем

🤣57🍌6🔥1

Signed Максим Якименко

13 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC≈1,910 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @bailanysty

Что было с Telegram в Казахстане📢📢📢📢 Сегодня казахстанцы пережили короткий, но заметный сбой Telegram. Мессенджер не открывался вообще. В Threads быстро появились одинаковые вопросы: «У всех Telegram лег?» и «Это только у меня?». При этом важная деталь: у многих Telegram начинал работать через VPN. Это обычно означает, что проблема могла быть не в самом приложении на телефоне, а в маршруте, по которому трафик из Каз

🔥13❤‍🔥8🤯5🤣4

12 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC≈2,330 views46 reactionsread 15 August 2026

1500$ за минималку 🔥

🍌34🔥12

12 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC≈2,210 views45 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @nesharuPhoto

А вот это уже вау. Я думал 15.000 а то и все 17.000 юаней. А тут такое))

🤣34❤‍🔥9🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC≈2,460 views83 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Surface Phone от Microsoft! В сеть слили фото реального прототипа Surface Phone, так что смартфон от Microsoft всё-таки существовал. Его разрабатывали ещё в 2012–2013 годах — отсюда знакомый рубленый дизайн в духе планшетов Surface и сенсорные кнопки под экраном. По железу всё скромно: 720p-дисплей, некий чип от Qualcomm и операционка Windows Phone 8.1. В продажу этот аппарат так и не поступил, а до полного закрыти

❤‍🔥55🔥20🤯8

11 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC≈2,480 views44 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Кстати это будет iPhone Duo, не Ultra. Я не знаю как в таком кризисе продавать смартфон ценой больше 2000$. Да, его будут покупать много, я почти уверен что больше 1 миллиона минимум, что уже больше всего рынка. Но по меркам Apple это будет мало и нерентабельно. Интересно посмотреть. Надеюсь получится хорошее устройство и рынок чуть сдвинется с точки. Но может и затухнуть как с очками дополненной реальности.

🤯27🤣10🔥7

11 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC≈2,420 views47 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

В сети оказали фото первой квадратной раскладушки... Xiaomi! Все как полагается: стеклянный интерфейс и новые иконки!

🤣26❤‍🔥15🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @stupidmadworld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTCAnonymous Poll741 voters

Какую нейронку используете в повседневной жизни, и почему?

  1. ChatGPT43%
  2. Gemini53%
  3. Claude21%
  4. Свой вариант (напишу в комментариях)11%

The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTCAnonymous Poll648 voters

Так окей, что следующее обозреваем?

  1. Душ Xiaomi29%
  2. Раковина Xiaomi21%
  3. Трусы Xiaomi66%
  4. Носки Xiaomi26%

The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 151,656 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Хмурчик Technology
@khmrchk · 108,078
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q111301580 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelStupidMadWorld
X / Twitter@stupidmadnews
YouTubeUCHFNDph3zTYh8-hwofOVXsg
Official sitehttps://www.stupidmadworld.com/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SMW” (@stupidmadworld), 16,848 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stupidmadworld.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.