Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 55 days, net +122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,302–22,478 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Sept 2026, 22:15
22,458
+23
15 Sept 2026, 20:40
22,435
+5
14 Sept 2026, 02:00
22,430
+4
12 Sept 2026, 06:40
22,426
+4
10 Sept 2026, 01:19
22,422
+42
6 Sept 2026, 19:00
22,380
+12
2 Sept 2026, 21:59
22,368
-5
1 Sept 2026, 19:25
22,373
-4
31 Aug 2026, 17:24
22,377
-4
30 Aug 2026, 16:23
22,381
-1
29 Aug 2026, 18:22
22,382
-5
28 Aug 2026, 19:22
22,387
+6
27 Aug 2026, 19:14
22,381
+7
26 Aug 2026, 20:04
22,374
+2
25 Aug 2026, 23:23
22,372
+2
24 Aug 2026, 23:57
22,370
+10
23 Aug 2026, 12:56
22,360
+3
21 Aug 2026, 20:05
22,357
-9
20 Aug 2026, 13:47
22,366
+4
19 Aug 2026, 12:23
22,362
first reading
Engagement
108 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.87%
avg views ÷ 22,458 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,220
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 108 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held
108 (24 July 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total
86,411
Reactions total
1,367
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Sept 2026, 13:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈973
Videos
≈788
Links
≈1,630
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4h 52m
Average length
6m 13s
Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,607 reactions across 102 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,486
54.0%
🔥
959
20.8%
💯
947
20.6%
✍
215
4.67%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 105 of the 108 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,763 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 108 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
153
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 106 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
120
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @minhajsunna. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 108 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Помогать людям сохранять спокойствие во времена тревог, когда трудно добывать средства к существованию, тоже относится к поклонению. Но об этом часто забывают.
Когда вам говорят о страшных временах и экономическом кризисе, напоминайте о Господе. Он добр и щедр, оберегает Свои творения и властвует над ними. В Его владениях происходит только то, что Он пожелал и предопределил.
Он, Пречистый, обещал хранить Своих рабо…
Супругам!!!
Одна женщина спросила шейха аль-Альбани, да помилует его Аллах:
— Шейх, до замужества, ещё девушкой, я часто постилась и выстаивала ночные молитвы. Я находила удивительное наслаждение в чтении Корана… А теперь перестала ощущать сладость поклонения.
Он спросил:
— А как ты заботишься о своём муже?
Она ответила:
— Шейх, я спрашиваю вас о Коране, посте, молитве и сладости поклонения, а вы спрашиваете ме…
📚 Многие не знают об этих достоинствах омовения💧(вуду)
Шейх Мансур ас-Сакъ’уб (да хранит его Аллах)
🔻Ссылка на данное видео в YouTube:
https://youtube.com/shorts/LGUHLw1k1E4
📚 Лейс ибн Са'д - был более знающим в фикхе, чем имам Малик?
Шейх Мустафа аль-'Адави (да хранит его Аллах)
🔻Ссылка на данное видео в YouTube:
https://youtube.com/shorts/3kUPmTUsSGs
📚 «Кроме тех, которые предстанут перед Аллахом с непорочным сердцем»
Шейх Хамза аль-Фар (да хранит его Аллах)
🔻Ссылка на данное видео в YouTube:
https://youtu.be/-2V1oHjETBo
▪️Напоминание о важности заботы о Коране:
https://youtu.be/b27pXKtTkl8
11–14 октября — интенсивный семинар в Мекке
Четыре дня очного изучения «Книги имана» из «Сахиха» имама аль-Бухари.
Уникальная возможность изучать самые достоверные хадисы Пророка ﷺ в лучшем месте на земле.
Проживание в пятизвёздочной гостинице, питание и трансфер от гостиницы до места проведения семинара и обратно оплачены. Участники оплачивают только перелёт и визу. Для граждан РФ виза бесплатная.
Всего 30 мест.…
Доктор АбдуЛлах ибн АбдульАзиз аль-Анкари пишет:
К числу нововведений относится проверка вероубеждения человека, известного своей приверженностью Сунне.
Некоторые назначили себя надзирателями за чужими убеждениями. Если им неизвестно вероубеждение человека, потому что они не знакомы с его трудами и заслугами, они обвиняют его в том, что его убеждения недостаточно ясны. Они хотят, чтобы он явился к ним и изложил сво…
📚 Хвала Аллаху, вышел очередной выпуск нашей передачи с уважаемым братом Хамзой аль-Фар (да хранит его Аллах) — известным чтецом Корана.
Для нас особенно ценно вновь встретиться с братом Хамзой и продолжить беседы о Коране, его чтении и всём, что связано с Книгой Аллаха.
Также в этом выпуске принял участие наш брат Мухаммад Акрам — доктор коранических наук, что сделало встречу ещё более содержательной и насыщенной.…
📚 Можно ли говорить: «Аллах везде Своим знанием?» А где Сам Аллах?
Шейх АбдуЛлах ибн Джибрин (да помилует его Аллах)
🔻Ссылка на данное видео в YouTube:
https://youtu.be/9BcSx4jxPjI
📚 Муджахид ибн Джабр - ученик ибн Аббаса (да будет доволен ими Аллах, и один из самых авторитетных муфассиров
Шейх Мутлякъ аль-Джасир (да хранит его Аллах)
🔻Ссылка на данное видео в YouTube:
https://youtu.be/HK07tHpDjHI
Женщине тоже велено беречь взор
Всевышний Аллах говорит:
﴿وَقُل لِّلْمُؤْمِنَاتِ يَغْضُضْنَ مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِنَّ﴾
«И скажи верующим женщинам, чтобы они опускали свои взоры».
[Сура «ан-Нур», 24:31]
Это повеление обращено к женщинам так же, как и к мужчинам. Однако в вопросе о взгляде женщины на постороннего мужчину без вожделения и при отсутствии опасения фитны (искушения) между учёными есть известное разногласие.…
Ты делишься полезными знаниями об исламе и обучаешь людей религии Аллаха? Задумайся, какая великая милость тебе дарована. Благодари Аллаха за неё!
Кто-то поглощён политикой и аналитикой, искусством и музыкой, спортом и модой. Кто-то растрачивает время на бесполезное, а порой и на запретное. А тебе Аллах дал возможность приносить людям пользу, знакомя их со Своей религией.
Однажды земная жизнь закончится. У одного п…
👍55💯19🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 108 posts we hold for @minhajsunna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@minhajsunna edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Абу Ислам аш-Шаркаси @abu_islam_official · 22,842 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
Исмаиль абу Мухаммад @Ismailabumuhammad · 26,810 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 September 2026
Шейх Солихь Аль-Усеймин @al_usemin · 20,650 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 September 2026
Шейх Усман Аль Хамис @usmankhamys · 57,362 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Доктор Мохамад Хамед @doctorMohamadhamed · 28,358 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
Юсуф Абу Закария @yusufabuzakariya · 24,133 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Бойкот Израиля @boykot_israil · 19,872 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 September 2026
Кирилл Джабраил @kirilljabrail · 19,731 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 30 September 2026
ХАДИСЫ И АЯТЫ @BookHadith · 34,279 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
Исламские книги PDF @kniga_pdf · 112,641 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
AL-FANAR SCHOOL @fanar_school · 25,871 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
𝐓 𝐀 𝐑 𝐈 𝐇/История Ислама @tarihmedia · 21,039 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 September 2026
Altruist News @altruist_news · 22,482 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Минхадж ас-Сунна” (@minhajsunna), 22,458 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minhajsunna.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.