Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ‘Шейх Ибн Бааз

Channel

‘Шейх Ибн Бааз

@ibnbazru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,297subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002089570883
TypeChannel
Username@ibnbazru
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ibnbazru

Growth

12,27712,29712,2877 August 2026 — 12,296 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,296 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,293 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,291 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,293 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,288 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,285 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,286 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,293 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,290 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,294 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,289 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,288 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,280 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,277 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,278 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,284 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,297 subscribers7 August 202625 August 2026
18 measurements spanning 18 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,274–12,300 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 22:5212,297+13
24 Aug 2026, 23:3712,284+6
23 Aug 2026, 13:1412,278+1
22 Aug 2026, 01:4812,277-3
20 Aug 2026, 22:5412,280-8
19 Aug 2026, 20:3512,288-1
18 Aug 2026, 19:0212,289-5
17 Aug 2026, 17:5812,294+4
16 Aug 2026, 16:4512,290-3
15 Aug 2026, 02:0712,293+7
13 Aug 2026, 18:2512,286+1
12 Aug 2026, 14:4512,285-3
11 Aug 2026, 13:0312,288-5
10 Aug 2026, 15:4612,293+2
9 Aug 2026, 12:3612,291-2
8 Aug 2026, 15:4212,293-3
7 Aug 2026, 12:5512,296no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:4712,296first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 12 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.3%
avg views ÷ 12,297 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,730
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held21 (12 February 202620 August 2026)
Views total7,460
Reactions total135
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Videos
9
Links
102

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3,224 reactions across 21 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,20768.5%
👍3209.93%
💯1504.65%
🔥1394.31%
💔1253.88%
❤‍🔥1013.13%
💘411.27%
👏351.09%
280.868%
😭210.651%
🤝140.434%
🥰80.248%
🕊50.155%
🏆40.124%
👀40.124%
😍40.124%
😢40.124%
🍓30.093%
💋20.062%
😎20.062%
6 further kinds70.217%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,224reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC≈1,980 views55 reactionsread 27 August 2026

КОГДА ЗАКАНЧИВАЕТСЯ ВРЕМЯ СОВЕРШЕНИЯ НАМАЗА ВИТР ❓❓❓❓ Когда заканчивается время совершения намаза витр? ✅✅✅✅ Оно заканчивается в последнюю часть ночи перед рассветом, согласно словам Пророка, да благословит его Аллах и приветствует: «Намаз ночью совершается по два ракаата. Если же кто-то из вас боится наступления рассвета, пусть совершит один ракаат, и это сделает нечетным то, что он совершил до этого». Этот хадис

51👍3❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC≈5,480 views80 reactionsread 27 August 2026

ХАДИС «НЕТ НАМАЗА ПОСЛЕ ПРЕДВЕЧЕРНЕГО НАМАЗА, ПОКА НЕ ЗАЙДЕТ СОЛНЦЕ...» ❓❓❓❓ Какова степень достоверности этого хадиса: «Нет намаза после предвечернего (аср) намаза, пока не зайдет солнце, и нет намаза после утреннего (фаджр) намаза, пока не взойдет солнце, кроме как в Мекке, кроме как в Мекке, кроме как в Мекке»? ✅✅✅✅ Этот хадис с добавлением «кроме как в Мекке» является слабым. Что касается основной части хадиса,

60❤‍🔥10👍9👻1

20 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC≈6,020 views128 reactionsread 27 August 2026

КАКОВО СУЖДЕНИЕ ОТНОСИТЕЛЬНО ПРОИЗНЕСЕНИЯ НАМЕРЕНИЯ ПЕРЕД НАМАЗОМ ВСЛУХ? ❓❓❓❓ Брат спрашивает: «Каково суждение относительно произнесения намерения перед намазом вслух?» ✅✅✅✅ Произносить намерение словами — это нововведение, а делать это вслух — еще более греховно. Сунной же является утверждать намерение в сердце, поскольку Всевышний Аллах знает все тайное и сокровенное. Он, всемогущ Он и велик, сказал: «Скажи: "Не

114💯9👍5

3 Jun 2026, 11:38 UTC≈14,200 views234 reactionsread 27 August 2026

• Шейх Ибн Баз (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: «Ответ на салям (приветствие) при совершении малого омовения не является нежелательным (макрух). Если кто-то поприветствовал тебя салямом когда ты берешь омовение, то ты обязан ответить ему на салям». ابن باز: رد السلام أثناء الوضوء ليس بمكروه، ولا ينقض الوضوء، فإذا سُلِّم عليك وأنت تتوضأ الوضوء الشرعي، فالواجب عليك: أن ترد السلام 📚 См. «аль-Маджму’» 10/155

158👍48💯13💘8🤝6🔥1

29 May 2026, 11:42 UTC≈13,700 views168 reactionsread 27 August 2026

• Шейх Ибн Баз (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: «Дозволено держать в руках книги по тафсиру (толкованию Корана) без преграды и без омовения, потому что они не являются мусхафом (т.е. книгой в которой лишь текст Корана)». ابن باز: يجوز إمساك كتب التفسير من غير حائل ومن غير طهارة، لأنها لا تسمى مصحفاً 📚 См. «аль-Маджму’» 10/148

116👍35❤‍🔥12🥰5

18 May 2026, 19:17 UTC≈14,400 views247 reactionsread 27 August 2026

✅ Чтение 3 сур Корана для защиты • Шейх Ибн Баз (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: «Чтение сур “Скажи: «Он — Аллах Единый»” (т.е. аль-Ихляс №112) и двух “му’аууизат” (т.е. аль-Фалякъ №113 и ан-Нас №114) утром и вечером по три раза является средством для защиты от колдовства и прочего зла». ابن باز: قراءة قل هو الله أحد والمعوذتين صباحًا ومساء ثلاث مرات من أسباب السلامة من السحر وغيره 📚 См. «Фатауа нурун ‘аля-ддарб»

165💯31👍27💘15❤‍🔥9

2 May 2026, 10:02 UTC≈15,200 views194 reactionsread 27 August 2026

• Шейх Ибн Баз (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: «Лучший вид поминания Аллаха (зикр) — это чтение Корана. Каждому верующему, будь это мужчина или женщина, следует часто читать Коран с размышлением». ابن باز: أفضل أنواع الذكر قراءة القرآن، هو أفضل الذكر، فينبغي لكل مؤمن ومؤمنة الإكثار من قراءة القرآن مع التدبر والتعقل 🔉 Сл. «Фатауа нурун ‘аля-ддарб» https://t.me/ibnbazru

155🔥14👏10👍7🤝4💘3💯1

26 Apr 2026, 14:03 UTC≈13,900 views199 reactionsread 27 August 2026

✅ Подготовка к смерти • Шейх Ибн Баз (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: «Все мусульмане, как мужчины, так и женщины, обязаны подготовиться к смерти и остерегаться беспечности в отношении нее, исходя из ранее приведенных аятов, а также того, что передано от пророка (ﷺ): “Часто вспоминайте разрушительницу наслаждений (т.е. смерть)”. И потому что беспечность относительно нее и отсутствие подготовки к ней — из причин плохого конца

148👍28❤‍🔥11💔8💘4

5 Apr 2026, 07:34 UTC≈14,500 views152 reactionsread 27 August 2026

🌍 ПРОЖИВАНИЕ В СТРАНЕ, В КОТОРОЙ НЕВОЗМОЖНО ОТКРЫТО ИСПОВЕДОВАТЬ РЕЛИГИЮ 🔴 ВОПРОС: Уважаемый шейх, что должен делать мусульманин, который проживает в неисламских странах, где его заставляют брить бороду, запрещают совершать намаз и заставляют публично совершать грехи? И если он покинет их ради своей семьи и имущества, то будет ли это считаться хиджрой? 🟢 ОТВЕТ ШЕЙХА ИБН БААЗА: Мусульманин должен остерегаться того,

93🔥20👍15❤‍🔥9💯72😍2👏1

30 Mar 2026, 17:02 UTC≈13,200 views183 reactionsread 27 August 2026

✅ Распространение невежества и уменьшение знаний • Шейх Ибн Баз (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: «Мы живем во время, когда невежество преобладает, а знаний стало мало. Люди, за исключением тех, кого пожелал Аллах уберечь, устремились к другим знаниям и делам, связанным с мирской жизнью, и поэтому их знание об Аллахе и Его религии уменьшилось. Они заняты тем, что отвлекает их от этого, и большинство уроков теперь посвящены ми

84💔54💯17👍9😭9🕊51🏆1

27 Mar 2026, 17:53 UTC≈9,680 views149 reactionsread 27 August 2026

🔈 Шейх Ибн Баз (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: لا ريب أن حرمان العلم النافع من أعظم المصائب «Нет сомнений в том, что лишение полезного знания относится к величайшим бедам». ✏️ См. «аль-Маджму’» 2/312 ⚙️ https://t.me/ibnbazru

86💯28💔19👍4🔥4😢3😭21

23 Mar 2026, 14:58 UTC≈11,800 views156 reactionsread 27 August 2026

🎤 Шейх Ибн Баз (رَحِمَهُ الله) сказал: «Время — это жизнь, и тот, кто погубил свое время, погубил свою жизнь. А тот, кто погубил свою жизнь, пожалеет, но сожаление не принесет ему пользы». ابن باز: الوقتُ هوَ الحَيَاة وَمَنْ أَضَاعَ وَقْتَهُ أضاعَ حياته وَمَنْ أَضَاعَ حياتهُ نَدِمَ وَلَا تَنْفَعُهُ النَدامة 🔖 См. «аль-Маджму’» 16/621 ⚙️ https://t.me/ibnbazru

80💔42🔥12👍6💘5😭3🍓2👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @ibnbazru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 118,359 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Шейх Усман Аль Хамис
@usmankhamys · 57,570
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Исламские книги PDF
@kniga_pdf · 112,941
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‘Шейх Ибн Бааз” (@ibnbazru), 12,297 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ibnbazru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.