Channel
@madrasa
On this record: Topic · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,912subscribers
-729 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001145010189 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @madrasa |
| Created | 9 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 66 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/madrasa |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
This channel is in a group of 7 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 07:41 | 18,912 | -11 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 08:08 | 18,923 | -9 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 16:56 | 18,932 | +14 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:59 | 18,918 | -8 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:44 | 18,926 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:40 | 18,929 | +1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:58 | 18,928 | -14 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:16 | 18,942 | -13 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:36 | 18,955 | -17 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:39 | 18,972 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:31 | 18,981 | -8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:30 | 18,989 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:17 | 18,992 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:04 | 18,998 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:59 | 19,001 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:49 | 19,006 | -10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:19 | 19,016 | -12 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:31 | 19,028 | -9 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 19,037 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:50 | 19,045 | first reading |
100 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 100 (23 July 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 35,560 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 04:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Сказал Са‘ид ибн Джубайр, да будет доволен им Аллах: «В День воскресения будет приведен раб, и будет вручена ему его книга. И не увидит он в ней своей молитвы и своего поста, и не увидит своих праведных деяний. Тогда он скажет: "О мой Господь! Это книга другого! Были у меня благие дела, но нет их в этой книге!" И будет сказано ему: "Поистине, твой Господь не ошибается и не забывает. Ушли твои деяния из-за твоего з…
https://t.me/madrasa
ПЯТНИЧНАЯ ХУТБА https://t.me/madrasa
https://t.me/madrasa
Шейхуль-Ислям ибн Таймия сказал: «Поистине, к величайшим видам поклонения относятся: устранение бедности и удовлетворение потребностей людей, помощь притеснённому, оказание помощи находящемуся в беде и побуждение к одобряемому». (Маджму' аль-фатауа, 28/243). https://t.me/madrasa
«Какая бы доля высокомерия ни проникла в сердце человека, его разум непременно скуднеет ровно на ту же меру, — будь её мало или много». Мухаммад ибн Али аль-Бакир, да помилует его Аллах. https://t.me/madrasa
Sticker, posted without a caption
Передается от Ибн Аббаса (да будет доволен Аллах им и его отцом), что он сказал: Посланник Аллаха ﷺ сказал: «Чёрный камень был ниспослан из Рая и он был белее молока, а чёрным его сделали грехи сынов Адама». Сказал аль-Мухибб ат-Табари: «В том, что он остается черным, кроется назидание для обладающих проницательностью: ибо если грехи оставили след на твердом камне, то их воздействие на сердце еще сильнее». «Тухфат…
Photo, posted without a caption
Мухаммад ибн аль-Мункадира спросили: «Что из мирской жизни тебе наиболее любимо?» Он ответил: «Оказывать благодеяния своим братьям (по вере)». (Китаб Аз-зухд, Ханнад 2/509). https://t.me/madrasa
00:35 — Введение. Место финансовых взаимоотношений в исламе. 03:33 — Общий обзор глав. Опасность искаженных переводов исламской литературы неспециалистами. 21:05 — Шариатское понимание аль-маль (имущества) и пути его обретения. 32:17 — Базовые правила сделок. Исключения из правил. 41:27 — Запрет на продажу чужого, несуществующего и харамного имущества. 1:01:34 — Продажа неизвестного (маджхуль) имущества и заключитель…
Имам аш-Шафи'и сказал: «Всякую вражду есть надежда умертвить… Кроме вражды того, кто враждует с тобой из зависти». (Манакиб аш-Шафи'и, 2/74)
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @madrasa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 2 posts on @madrasa as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“المدرسة • 🌐 • Аль-Мадраса” (@madrasa), 18,912 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/madrasa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.