Channel
@AlHanabil
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
7,198subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001438676483 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AlHanabil |
| Description | Канал о ханбалитском мазхабе. Бот для анонимных вопросов http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=ukmvlcl1utp6acc |
| Created | 21 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AlHanabil |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 7,198 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 7,196 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 7,193 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 7,193 | first reading |
56 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 54 of 56 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 56 (5 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 40,269 |
| Reactions total | 796 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
796 reactions across 54 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 404 | 50.8% | |
| 👍 | 244 | 30.7% | |
| 🔥 | 66 | 8.29% | |
| 😭 | 26 | 3.27% | |
| ⚡ | 11 | 1.38% | |
| ✍ | 11 | 1.38% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 1.38% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 1.26% | |
| 😴 | 9 | 1.13% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.126% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.126% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 0.126% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.126% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 796reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Рукописный почерк имама Ибн Касира (да помилует его Аллах), содержащий упоминание о его прослушивании чтения Муватта имама Малика у своей шейхи Зайнаб бинт аль-Камаль аль-Макдисия ад-Димашкия (да помилует её Аллах) в мечети ханбалитов у подножия горы Касиюн в Дамаске.🪶
❤8🔥4👍3😁1😭1
Ибн Каййим аль Джаузия аль Ханбали 691-751 г.х пишет: Если он заменит ослушание покорностью, Аллах заменит для него наказание благополучием, а унижение достоинством🪶
❤17😭4👍1
Обрати на это внимание и пусть присутствующий передаст тому, кто отсутствует 🪶
❤9✍1
Блогерши, которые выставляют себя напоказ, оголяют своё тело, носят облегающую одежду и т. д., являются открыто совершающими грех. Но братья, которые берут у них рекламу и платят им за это, тем самым поддерживают их и становятся соучастниками в грехе. Вместо того чтобы порицать её за открытое совершение греха, они пользуются её услугами и платят ей за рекламу, тем самым содействуя ей в продолжении этого греха. Сказ…
❤21👍4
Сказал ибн Джаузи аль Ханбали 508-597 г.х: Кто исправит своё сокровенное состояние, того достоинство и добродетель распространят своё благоухание, и сердца наполнятся ароматом его благого нрава. Так бойтесь Аллаха в отношении своего внутреннего состояния! Ибо при его испорченности внешняя праведность не принесёт человеку никакой пользы.🪶
❤20👍6
Аль Хафиз Ибн аль-Джаузи аль Ханбали ум. 597 г. х. сказал: Слова Всевышнего: ﴿وَأَزْوَاجُهُ أُمَّهَاتُهُمْ﴾ "А его жёны — их матери” (Аль-Ахзаб, 6) То есть в отношении вечной запретности женитьбы на них, а также обязательности почитания и уважения к ним. Однако положения, касающиеся матерей, не распространяются на них во всех вопросах. Ведь если бы они были подобны матерям во всём, то никому не было бы дозволено…
👍7🔥6❤4
Однажды я посватался к одной девушке, но её мать была против. Я не ухищрялся, не говорил: Давай найдём имама, кадия или ещё кого-нибудь, чтобы он выдал тебя замуж, и тому подобное. Сейчас же, когда отец или родитель отказывается, люди начинают искать способы обойти его запрет: Такой-то имам выдаст тебя замуж, Такой-то кадий согласен стать твоим вали и т. д. Всё это скверно. И хотя этот отказ глубоко ранил меня, нес…
❤26⚡6🔥6👀3
Пишет аль Хафиз Ибн аль Джаузи аль Ханбали 508-597 г.х: Рекомендуется тому, кто желает выдать свою дочь замуж, искать для неё молодого человека приятной внешности, поскольку женщина любит то же, что любит мужчина. См. Ахкам ан-Ниса'. Стр.134.
❤21😁7🔥2😴2
Мутляк аль Джасир пишет: Несколько слов, сказанных от чистого сердца и содержащих полезное наставление, могут стать причиной великого дела, польза от которого достигнет самых далёких уголков. Вот один из таких примеров: Сахих аль-Бухари был составлен по совету имама Исхака ибн Рахавейха. Аль-Бухари говорит: Однажды я присутствовал на собрании Исхака ибн Рахавейха, и он сказал: “Кто из вас возьмётся собрать досто…
❤16👍3🔥2
Надеюсь будет полезно 🪶
❤15🔥2
Таким образом, если вы покупаете через интернет например, на Wildberries, Ozon и других подобных площадках, выбирайте оплату при получении. Если товар вас не устроит, вы сможете от него отказаться. Если же вы довольны покупкой, то получаете золото или украшение из золота/серебра и тут же производите оплату. Таким образом, представитель продавца получает оплату, а вы получаете свой товар из рук в руки, непосредств…
👍17✍3❤2
Пишет Мутляк аль Джасир: В последнее время часто спрашивают о постановлении относительно покупки золота или серебра дистанционно (онлайн). Ответ: это не дозволено, поскольку передача товара произойдёт позже оплаты, тогда как одним из условий действительности покупки золота и серебра является кабд (التقابض) немедленная передача как цены, так и приобретаемого товара. Однако если человек выбрал определённое изделие и…
👍12
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @AlHanabil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А если покупка золото и серебра через интернет, но с условием " оплата при получении товара?"
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Можно ли покупать золото и серебро через интернет?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 3,951 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ханбалитский Мазхаб” (@AlHanabil), 7,198 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlHanabil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.