Video, posted without a caption

Channel
Ученик
@mutaallem
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,906subscribers
+116 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001373271585 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mutaallem |
| Description | ◆ Классическое исламское наследие, история и культура. ◆ Полезные заметки и пошаговые советы для начинающих. ✓ Арабский язык и таджвид тут: @arabigram © Мухаммада ад-Дагистани. |
| Created | 11 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mutaallem |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:55 | 9,906 | +3 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 11:30 | 9,903 | -13 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:50 | 9,916 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:27 | 9,917 | -7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:41 | 9,924 | +5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:19 | 9,919 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:18 | 9,923 | +113 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 9,810 | +21 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 07:11 | 9,789 | +2 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 9,787 | +39 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 12:55 | 9,748 | -30 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 9,778 | +12 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 9,766 | +18 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 9,748 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 9,749 | -16 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 9,765 | +6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:09 | 9,759 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 9,761 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:11 | 9,763 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 9,766 | first reading |
Engagement
77 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 29.5%
- avg views ÷ 9,906 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,930
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 27
- of 77 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 77 (15 July 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 67,309 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 10:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈736
- Videos
- ≈96
- Links
- ≈1,680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 21m 37s
- Average length
- 3m 36s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (40.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Продолжаем чтение шарха на Китабу Ттаухид. 285 стр. https://t.me/arabigram?livestream Записи уроков тут: https://t.me/+W01E0zp2z_gyZTE0 Кашфу ш-Шубухат завершим утром в пятницу ин шаа Ллах.
Некоторые упоминали, что шейх Мухаммад аль-Амин аш-Шанкити, да смилуется над ним Аллах, запрещал задавать научные вопросы во время чаепития и говорил: «Если я потеряю время отдыха, то потеряю и время работы».
«Призывая приверженцев лжи к истине, следует сохранять душевное спокойствие и не проявлять вспыльчивости. Какая бы ревность за религию ни наполняла твоё сердце, не подобает тебе быть грубым и жестокосердным, ведь милосердие и мягкость — основа успеха призыва» 🎙 Со слов шейха Салиха ас-Сувейха, да содействует ему Аллах, на уроке по разъяснению книги «Устранение сомнений» 28.05.1448 г. (8/11/2026 г.) ✈️ https://t.me/…
Урок начался
Прямой эфир этого урока https://t.me/mutaallem/3863 по этой ссылке: https://t.me/khizana_62?livestream
Советую прочитать эту брошюрку вдумчиво и предпринять необходимые меры по обороне от Иблиса и его козней. В частности, что касается его козней 1. против людей поклонения 2. против людей, впавших в грехи 3. против людей знания 4. против людей Корана 5. против проповедников ⤵️ Ссылка: https://t.me/arabigram/726
В ногу со временем! Сегодня посетил «Навыки эффективного взаимодействия с инструментами искусственного интеллекта», которую организовали для организации по призыву в Медине. В принципе ничего нового не узнал, но было интересно послушать как арабы рассказывают и хотелось понять насколько местные работники готовы к новым прорывным инструментам. Неплохо!
Идея этого приложения https://t.me/arabigram/700 с азкарами появилась, когда я делал презентацию для женского марказа, который открыл шейх Салих Ба-Файйад, (о нем писали тут https://t.me/mutaallem/3855 места уже заполнены) Надеюсь, что оно будет полезно и для вас: https://arabigram-azkar.netlify.app
Из козней Иблиса против людей знания 1. Искание знания ради положения и статуса. Знание обращается из поклонения Аллаху в средство добиться высокого места, в усердие ради многочисленности последователей или ради похвалы людей. Тот, кто вдумается в тексты, увидит, что искренность ради Аллаха требуется в каждом деле — и в искании знания в том числе. Довольно нам того грозного хадиса, в котором Пророк, мир ему и благос…
﷽ Радостная новость! С помощью Аллаха состоится научный урок по книге: 📚 «Кашф аш-шубухат» («Устранение сомнений») ✏️ имама-обновителя шейха Мухаммада ибн Абдуль-Ваххаба, да помилует его Аллах. 📅 Суббота и воскресенье 27 и 28 / 1448 г. х. 🕔 Аср, Магриб и Иша. 🕌 В мечети Аль-Баляви в районе Аль-Файсалия в Медине. 📍 Расположение мечети: https://maps.app.goo.gl/BTvmrL8kmpSQATgi8 ═══ ¤❁✿❁¤ ═══
Чем более доступным и распространенным станет искуственный интеллект, тем более ценным будет становится естественный интеллект, поэтому прокачивайте его чтением книг, заучиванием наизусть, изучением новых языков, размышлением над сложными задачами и т. д.
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @mutaallem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @mutaallem as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 35 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 3
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@live_in_madina · 9,0592 postsВоспитание Единобожника
@halalcartoon · 4,8381 postʍᴀᴧиᴋиᴛᴄᴋий ᴄᴀᴧяɸиᴛ
@malikitskiy_salyafit · 1781 postНеДоТорговец
@nedotorgovec · 231 postпрямой путь отличился
@pentiuum04 · 3701 postО прочитанных книгах
@prochitannie · 4,9611 postquran_94.6
@quran_94_6 · 401 postRasul blog
@rasul_blog · 2661 postпросто пользы
@riyaduumm · 6171 postDzhem™️
@smmdzhem · 61 postأصول الدين
@usuladdin · 8,7291 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@BLAGOE_SLOV0 · 16,1824 postsСейтуев
@seytuevru · 22,0042 postsالمجالس العلمية
@Quran_councils · 7121 postDAR UJOUR
@dar_ujour · 3,6401 postHanif | الفوائد
@hanif_alfawaid · 4,7961 postХатва | Коран для детей
@khatwaschool · 351 postБлог Ахмада Макеева
@makeev_blog · 16,3741 postМухаммад ад-Дагистани
@mdgstny · 1,2731 postالشيخ صالح بن محمد السويِّح
@salehalswayeh · 2,1711 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@arabigram · 3,21319 postsБЛАГОЕ СЛОВО
@BLAGOE_SLOV0 · 16,1825 postsالمجالس العلمية
@Quran_councils · 7122 postsالشيخ صالح بن محمد السويِّح
@salehalswayeh · 2,1712 postsTribute
@tribute · 1,847,1762 postsالشيخ عبدالرزاق البدر
@altwohed3 · 74,7001 postDAR UJOUR
@dar_ujour · 3,6401 postقناة خزانة العلم
@khizana_62 · 22,4491 postБлог Ахмада Макеева
@makeev_blog · 16,3741 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ummah_chitay · 20,965
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 September 2026
@saudiauae · 19,220
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 October 2026
@Diroya · 49,849
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
@tarihmedia · 21,165
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 September 2026
@al_usemin · 20,674
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 September 2026
@kniga_pdf · 112,972
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
@AsmauLLahi · 19,544
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 October 2026
@MedinaUroki · 25,470
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
@SaudiaPress · 20,048
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
@DurratAlHijraRealEstateOffice · 22,310
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 23 September 2026
@fanar_school · 24,889
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
@abu_islam_official · 23,098
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
@usmankhamys · 57,203
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
@mansurfinance1 · 33,572
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 September 2026
@khaledabdelazizm · 105,989
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@BookHadith · 33,817
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
@minhajsunna · 22,452
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 September 2026
@my_misr_arabic · 22,875
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 September 2026
@chtecyasiraddausari · 19,198
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 October 2026
@ahmedeskander4 · 45,258
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
@dralfawzann · 40,453
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ученик” (@mutaallem), 9,906 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mutaallem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.