Channel
@showpluschainofficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,385subscribers
-95 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002040737816 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @showpluschainofficial |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/showpluschainofficial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 21,385 | -22 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 21,407 | -17 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 21,424 | -34 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 21,458 | -22 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 21,480 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 21,480 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
110 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 63 | 57.3% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 23.6% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 4.55% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 4.55% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 3.64% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.73% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.82% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.909% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.909% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2024 to 16 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎉 Show+ Video Contest is LIVE! 🎉 Turn your creativity into Show+ Candy rewards! Here’s how to join the fun: Record & Upload your best video (dance, trick, comedy, or about yourself) Compete head-to-head with other creators or just vote for your fav video. Every view, like, and share boosts your score Win Show+ Candy each week and redeem it for awesome perks Ready to take the stage? 🌐Website ✈️Group 🐦Twitter 📲…
👍3❤2
😤 “We’ll never get non-toxic media…” 👀 Show+ enters the chat 💛 Real vibes. Real rewards. No drama. Tired of IG/X/FB chaos? Come chill with us on Show+ 👇 🌐Website ✈️Group 🐦Twitter 📲IOS 📲Play Store
👍4
🚨What kind of content is most likely to win on Show+?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Guys!!!!!!!! 🚨 What's your best platform/activities in Show+
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👏2
🔥 AI-generated videos like this are trending now! Why not upload your own on Show+? If it's eye-catching, you might just earn a surprise reward 👀🎁 Tell us your AI prompt idea!! #IOS | #Android
👍3❤1
Have a Good one guys! ✌️
👍4
Don’t miss it! SHC2.0 is just getting started 🚨 Buy now, hold strong 🔥 Big things are coming. Be part of it. XT | Bitmart
👍4❤1🔥1
📈 SHC2.0 is flying high! From dips to steady climbs — the chart says it all! We’re holding strong above $82 with solid volume and bullish momentum. 💰 Ready to ride the wave? This is what healthy growth looks like. Let’s keep the energy flowing!
❤2👍2🥰2😘1
SHC2.0 Giveaway Winners Announced! 🎉 Huge thanks to everyone who participated in our SHC2.0 giveaway 🙌 Your support means everything to us — the SHC2.0 community is growing stronger every day! 🟢 Congrats to our lucky winners: @Xyana2045 @Y_ab_Y @goat293 @zamanwi @현수 구 @Power2228 @SYF666 🎁 You’ll each receive your SHC2.0 shortly! If you didn’t win this time — don’t worry, more giveaways are coming soon. So stay…
❤4👍3
😤 “We’ll never get non-toxic media…” 👀 Show+ enters the chat 💛 Real vibes. Real rewards. No drama. Tired of IG/X/FB chaos? Come chill with us on Show+ 👇 🌐Website ✈️Group 🐦Twitter 📲IOS 📲Play Store
👍5👏1
🚨 GIVEAWAY TIME! 🚨 We’re picking 10 lucky winners to receive FREE SHC2.0 tokens 💰💥 Here’s how to enter: 1️⃣ React to this post 2️⃣ Comment with your address Winners announced in 48 hours! ⏳ Let the $SHC2.0 rain begin 🌐🚀
👍16👏1
Which Feature do you wish to be added to Show+ App next?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🥱4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @showpluschainofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🚨What kind of content is most likely to win on Show+?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Guys!!!!!!!! 🚨 What's your best platform/activities in Show+
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which Feature do you wish to be added to Show+ App next?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2024 to 16 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 731,134 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@showpluschainofficial named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ShowPlusChainOfficial” (@showpluschainofficial), 21,385 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/showpluschainofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.