Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ivar Negreev & Religions

Channel

Ivar Negreev & Religions

@ivannegreev

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,670subscribers

+1,730 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002663306887
TypeChannel
Username@ivannegreev
DescriptionЗдравствуйте, меня зовут Иван Негреев я религиовед, а это мой канал. Здесь я публикую анонсы мероприятий, какие-то мысли свои, куски семинаров по истории и философии религии. Добро пожаловать🙏
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ivannegreev

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,9407,6706,8056 August 2026 — 5,940 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,962 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,151 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,348 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,471 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,535 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,587 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,618 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,653 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,686 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,787 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,859 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,912 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,062 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,168 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,248 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,269 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,306 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,342 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,361 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,384 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,394 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,439 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,521 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,670 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 95 days, net +1,730. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,681–7,930 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 13:057,670+149
5 Nov 2026, 20:407,521+82
3 Nov 2026, 03:317,439+45
31 Oct 2026, 09:297,394+10
28 Oct 2026, 09:547,384+23
25 Oct 2026, 06:277,361+19
21 Oct 2026, 22:167,342+36
18 Oct 2026, 09:507,306+37
15 Oct 2026, 04:267,269+21
12 Oct 2026, 08:377,248+80
5 Oct 2026, 11:147,168+106
27 Sept 2026, 13:177,062+150
15 Sept 2026, 17:576,912+53
12 Sept 2026, 02:566,859+72
7 Sept 2026, 18:416,787+101
2 Sept 2026, 16:366,686+33
30 Aug 2026, 08:196,653+35
26 Aug 2026, 22:576,618+31
23 Aug 2026, 14:076,587+52
19 Aug 2026, 21:426,535first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.2%
avg views ÷ 7,670 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,700
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held27 (21 June 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total28,180
Reactions total1,912
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 14:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
156
Videos
22
Links
62

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,559 reactions across 27 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,02347.0%
🔥1,89422.1%
👍7889.21%
❤‍🔥4995.83%
😁4104.79%
🙏3283.83%
🤣1381.61%
🥰810.946%
🕊580.678%
👏510.596%
🤔470.549%
🎉410.479%
😍370.432%
😱250.292%
⚡210.245%
💯170.199%
🤯120.14%
👻110.129%
💅90.105%
💔90.105%
20 further kinds600.701%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,559 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 20:25 UTC≈3,000 views285 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Снятие завес. В тибетских монастырях обязательно есть храм Дхармапал (Защитников), так называемый Гонкханг. В обычные дни Защитники стоят с занавешенными ликами, потому что они несут священный ужас инобытия, невыносимый для обычного течения жизни. Но раз в году, завесы снимают, и каждый может заглянуть им в глаза. В этот день в храме стоит особый звенящий воздух праздника. Меня часто спрашивают, почему тибетская ик…

❤140🔥74👍36❤‍🔥18🙏10🤔4😁2💅1

4 Nov 2026, 11:31 UTC≈4,860 views301 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Вышел подкаст любопытный, поговорили о религиозной жизни, ее связи с философией, о том каково соотношение теории и практики в истории религий и еще много о чем🙏🙏🙏 https://youtu.be/9yue67pXeYc?si=c8-pICMom3O7Rhie

❤162🔥59🙏41👍25👏7🥰6💅1

2 Nov 2026, 14:21 UTC≈4,730 views469 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Какое же невероятное место осенний Ладакх, еще писать и писать об этом. Церемонии заклинания демонов, пророчества оракула, вселение гневных божеств, вереницы пудж, бесконечная радость религиоведа, тут самая замечательная осень.

❤271👍95❤‍🔥57🔥44💅1🤝1

31 Oct 2026, 14:57 UTC≈5,250 views287 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @punkmonkprodPhoto

Всем привет! Сегодня на нашем канале премьера нового видео Ивана Негреева! На этот раз речь пойдет о скандинавской мифологии. Разговор пойдет о том, во что верили викинги, как они представляли себе рай и почему даже боги у них были смертны. Всем приятного просмотра! Ютуб - https://youtu.be/2NJw2T98yMk ВК Видео - https://vkvideo.ru/video-212264082_456239244

❤143🔥73👍45🥰7🙏7👏6⚡4💅1

31 Oct 2026, 11:22 UTC≈4,710 views111 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @litsomelPhoto

Друзья, через неделю, 7 ноября в 18:00 в филиале Ельцин центра в Москве в усадьбе Долгоруковых-Бобринских Арсений Дежуров и Иван Негреев прочтут лекцию «Апокалипсис с хорошим концом». Строго говоря, за всю историю мировой литературы сохранилась только одна книга, которая заканчивается однозначной победой добра над злом - это апокалипсис Иоанна Богослова. Но почему же в таком случае мы никогда не имеем в виду ничего …

❤52❤‍🔥27👍16🔥15💅1

23 Oct 2026, 13:00 UTC≈5,630 views459 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Это мы с нашим режиссером Юрой, забыли сфотографироваться в студии, и сделали снимок уже на улице. Записали два выпуска. Один, открывающий разговор о религиозной культуре Древнего Китая. Планируем сделать серию для ПанкМонка с разговорами о конфуцианстве, даосизме и тд. Второй выпуск о скандинавской дохристианской религиозности. После записи у Станислава Дробышевского, а разговор там получился, как мне показалось н…

🔥206❤151👍76⚡8🥰5👏4🙏4😁3

12 Oct 2026, 17:33 UTC≈6,300 views448 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Позвали меня недавно на подкаст Дробышевский плюс на RTVI с темой по скандинавской мифологии. Когда-то я занимался этой темой очень много, сейчас почти не занимаюсь, но за последние годы сильно далеко тема и не продвинулась. Основные вопросы и проблемы остаются те же: как так вышло, что в письменных источниках Один стоит выше Тора, и каковы вообще источники по скандинавской мифологии? Можем ли мы им доверять? Отража…

❤233🔥113👍55❤‍🔥34👏12💅1

4 Oct 2026, 11:01 UTC≈6,510 views191 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Кажется, в прошлом посте я слишком увлекся рассказом о Тибете и не явно сказал о главном (так мне сказали). Мы действительно собираем группу и приглашаем присоединиться к нашему путешествию в Малый Тибет (Ладакх) уже с 26 октября – 3 ноября (дни путешествия без учета дней перелета). Мне кажется, ценность этой поездки как раз в том, что это будет не обычный туристический маршрут. Группа небольшая, а значит, будет во…

❤104🔥61👏8❤‍🔥7👍4🕊3🙏3💅1

27 Sept 2026, 12:05 UTC≈19,100 views259 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Все мы говорим «тибетский буддизм», но что это и где? «Большой Тибет» это: Основные регионы 🌞У-Цанг (Центр) — религиозное сердце региона, включающее Лхасу и Шигадзе. 🌞Кхам (Восток) — земля четырёх рек и шести хребтов. 🌞Амдо (Северо-Восток) — родина Далай-ламы XIV. Регионы тибетской культуры 🌞Ладакх — Малый Тибет в Индии. 🌞Мустанг, Цюм, Долло, Ролвалинг — исторические королевства и скрытые долины в Непале. 🌞Солукхум…

❤142🔥77👍24❤‍🔥8🙏3🍓2💅1🥰1

20 Sept 2026, 13:28 UTC≈8,740 views297 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

«Младший брат Христа». В середине XIX века Китай захлебнулся в крови. Самая разрушительная гражданская война в истории человечества, унесшая, по разным оценкам, от 20 до 30 миллионов жизней. В её основе лежала синкретическая религиозная утопия, созданная человеком, который искренне считал себя родным братом Иисуса Христа. Его звали Хун Сюцюань, и он создал «Небесное царство» на Земле. Хун Сюцюань родился в бедной с…

🔥112❤90👍45😱22🤔10👀7🕊6❤‍🔥2

9 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC≈2,480 views303 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Из увиденного в монастырях Тибета больше всего впечатляют храмы Защитников. Впечатляют и озадачивают. Огромные статуи угрожающих божеств, Махакала, Ямантака, Палден Лхамо…. Их лица искажены гневом, из открытых пастей торчат клыки, а шеи украшены гирляндами из отрубленных голов, рук, ног. Палден Лхамо восседает на коне, у которого седло сделано из кожи, снятой с ее собственного сына. Они все закрыты завесами, так как …

❤154🔥63👍38❤‍🔥22🙏14🙈4🗿3😍3

8 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈2,590 views314 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @punkmonkprodPhoto

В комментариях под роликом про Каббалу от Ивана Негреева очень просили, чтобы мы сняли вторую часть. Пройти мимо ваших просьб мы не могли. Поэтому смотрите продолжение рассказа! Всем отличного дня! Ютуб - https://youtu.be/zPO8NYXbwSk ВК Видео - https://vkvideo.ru/video-212264082_456239237

🔥153❤97👍37🥰8🙏8❤‍🔥6🤗3🌚2

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ivannegreev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ivar Negreev & Religions” (@ivannegreev), 7,670 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ivannegreev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.