Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bookish Madness

Channel

Bookish Madness

@bookishmadnesss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

14,894subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001615887215
TypeChannel
Username@bookishmadnesss
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bookishmadnesss

Growth

14,89014,90814,8997 August 2026 — 14,908 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,905 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,899 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,890 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,894 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,903 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,899 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,900 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,894 subscribers14,8947 August 202616 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,887–14,911 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:3514,894-6
14 Aug 2026, 14:1314,900+1
13 Aug 2026, 07:2814,899-4
12 Aug 2026, 09:4414,903+9
11 Aug 2026, 11:0314,894+4
10 Aug 2026, 07:4114,890-9
9 Aug 2026, 07:1214,899-6
8 Aug 2026, 05:0414,905-3
7 Aug 2026, 12:3314,908first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.9%
avg views ÷ 14,894 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,800
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held29 (26 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total162,360
Reactions total8,075
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 28s
Average length
2m 28s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,075 reactions across 28 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,06750.4%
❤‍🔥1,69521.0%
🔥88711.0%
🎉3774.67%
👻1962.43%
👍1842.28%
1321.63%
🥰1141.41%
😁1011.25%
👀961.19%
💯680.842%
😭430.533%
🙊360.446%
💘260.322%
👨‍💻110.136%
🤝110.136%
👏80.099%
😨50.062%
😍40.05%
😢40.05%
4 further kinds100.124%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,075reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
3.45%
1 of 29 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
9,290
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
6,020
over 27 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGB9LAD130 July 202630 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈2,690 views31 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

Понравилась книга «Человек-невидимка»?

  1. Да 👏16%
  2. Нет 🙂‍↔️4%
  3. Хочу знать ответ79%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

238

14 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈2,740 views82 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️ ⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️ День 5 🌸 Финал Прочитали до конца. Обсуждаем в комментариях! Мне очень понравилось! С одной стороны история безумца, в руки которого попадает некое подобие власти. С другой стороны, история о развращении этой самой властью. Даже Марвел, человек в целом непритязательный, мечтал в конце о том, что бы он сделал, попади эта власть к нему в руки. Гриффин изначально был человеком злобн

61👻11❤‍🔥8🤓2

13 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈3,370 views107 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️ ⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️ День 4 🌸 Прочитали Главы 20-23. Обсуждаем в комментариях! Всю предысторию мы узнали. Кошку я ему не прощу… А вообще, что до своей невидимости, что во время нее - Гриффин отвратительный человек. Моральных норм для него просто не существует. Нынешние неудобства просто удобное прикрытие для того, чтобы оправдать свою жестокость и отсутствие человечности. Сожженные дома, покалеченные

95❤‍🔥8👻4

12 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈3,810 views117 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️ ⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️ День 3 🌸 Прочитали Главы 14-19. Обсуждаем в комментариях! Значит Гриффин. Интересно что он встретил своего знакомого из прошлой жизни, но так и не сумел убедить его в своей адекватности 😅 Меня, кстати, тоже. Да, он человек науки. Да, нормально бояться что твою работу украдут у тебя из под носа. Но все его поведение вместе делает его параноидальным агрессивным тираном. Вообще, инт

67🎉38❤‍🔥12

12 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC≈4,360 views284 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Все успели посмотреть трейлер экранизации «Тайного дневника Верити»? Мне очень понравился подбор актеров 👀 Энн я вообще обожаю, а Дакота идеально вписалась 🔥 Будете смотреть? Уже в октябре 🤝

227🎉36🤝11💯8🙈2

11 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈4,500 views136 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас в совместных чтениях у нас «Человек-невидимка» 👀 И тут с героями у Уэллса всё хорошо — их немного, запутаться сложно. А вот вспоминаю «Секретное досье» — там мне периодически ОЧЕНЬ хотелось спросить: так, а это кто и что у нас с ним было? Так вот, в Яндекс Книгах появился люмен – ИИ-компаньон, который помогает лучше ориентироваться в книгах. Одна из его первых возможностей — функция «О персонажах»: прямо по

90🔥44❤‍🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈4,340 views125 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️ ⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️ День 2 🌸 Прочитали Главы 6-13. Обсуждаем в комментариях! Во-первых, вам не убедить меня в том что Мистер Х положительный персонаж. Я даже более чем уверена что он антигерой. Да, можно понять его раздражение. Даже можно понять что сподвигло его на кражу. Но в целом его отношение к людям можно описать словом «террор». Необходимая ли это жестокость? Он растерял свои человеческие черт

💯6054😁7❤‍🔥2👻2

11 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈6,420 views236 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ИСТОРИЯ МОИХ РОДОВ 🤰🏻🔥 + Вопрос-Ответ уже на бусти! Очень эмоциональное и честное видео на целый час 😳 Доступно по подписке и для отдельной покупки ❤️ Посмотреть можно 👉🏻тут👈🏻

19127👨‍💻10❤‍🔥4😍4

10 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈5,110 views177 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️ ⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️ День 1 🌸 Прочитали Главы 1-5. Обсуждаем в комментариях! Мне очень нравится! Даже не ожидала что мы так легко и увлекательно впишемся в повествование. Пока наш Мистер Х не самый привлекательный персонаж. Раздражительный, вредный, да еще и не гнушается воровством 😅 Это как задачка из детства. Что бы вы сделали, если бы на час стали невидимым? Меня пока интересует вот что. Он разра

😁8552🔥31❤‍🔥5👻4

10 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈4,910 views201 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⌨⌨⌨⌨⌨ ⌨⌨⌨⌨⌨⌨ 1. Компания «Охотники на монстров» - как мне нравится! Это что-то нереально динамичное, увлекательное, с вайбом сериала «Сверхъестественное», если бы Бобби и Элен открыли компанию и набирали рекрутов 😏 Пока много внимания уделялось именно обучению на охотника, жаркой атмосфере Алабамы, всевозможному оружию и, конечно, адаптации к миру полному чудовищ. А вот первая вылазка и охота на вампиров на корабле

165❤‍🔥30💘6

10 Aug 2026, 03:42 UTC≈5,890 views304 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня стартуют совместные чтения 📖🤝 Вечером встречаемся здесь для обсуждения 🔥

190👻72❤‍🔥2712👏2🎉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @bookishmadnesss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTCAnonymous Poll901 voters

Понравилась книга «Человек-невидимка»?

  1. Да 👏16%
  2. Нет 🙂‍↔️4%
  3. Хочу знать ответ79%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTCAnonymous Poll1,610 voters approx.

Что читаем в августе?

  1. Превращение22%
  2. Человек-невидимка26%
  3. Не участвую, хочу знать ответ52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 164,127 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bookish Madness” (@bookishmadnesss), 14,894 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bookishmadnesss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.