应要求 转发已隐去消息来源 codex 分析出来一个任意执行命令的后门 当从 HTTPS API 收到 10000 这个 code 的时候会把 message 直接视为命令然后放到有 root 的 shell 和无 root 的 shell 分别同时执行一遍
🤯17👍8

Channel
@gjzsr_channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15,783subscribers
-33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001367281683 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gjzsr_channel |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gjzsr_channel |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 15,783 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 15,791 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 15,795 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 15,798 | -10 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 15,808 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 15,812 | +5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 15,807 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 15,814 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 15,815 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:29 | 15,816 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 15,819 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 15,816 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 15,818 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 15,823 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 15,834 | +8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 15,826 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 15,823 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 15,825 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 15,826 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 15,824 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (10 June 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 6,589 |
| Reactions total | 88 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
803 reactions across 29 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 207 | 25.8% | |
| 😁 | 179 | 22.3% | |
| ❤ | 89 | 11.1% | |
| 👍 | 80 | 9.96% | |
| 🤮 | 59 | 7.35% | |
| 🤣 | 54 | 6.72% | |
| 🤡 | 35 | 4.36% | |
| 👎 | 21 | 2.62% | |
| 😱 | 20 | 2.49% | |
| 🤬 | 17 | 2.12% | |
| 🤯 | 17 | 2.12% | |
| 🐳 | 16 | 1.99% | |
| 🙈 | 4 | 0.498% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 0.374% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.125% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.125% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 803 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
应要求 转发已隐去消息来源 codex 分析出来一个任意执行命令的后门 当从 HTTPS API 收到 10000 这个 code 的时候会把 message 直接视为命令然后放到有 root 的 shell 和无 root 的 shell 分别同时执行一遍
🤯17👍8
Posted without readable text
😁17🤮6❤2🤡1
现已支持 QQ https://github.com/liuran001/WeChat-LiquidGlass/releases
👍10❤4
MiCTS 在任意Android 9–17设备上触发圈定即搜(Circle to Search)功能 对 HyperOS 4 / Android 17 做了适配 代码抄的 wxxsfxyzm/MiuiBackGestureHook 两个版本 MiCTS 开头的是激活 圈定即搜(Google 搜索) VISTrigger 开头的是激活 Gemini 语音助手 @bakaPD 修复了模块自动失效的问题
👍5
微信液态玻璃底栏 LSPosed 模块 https://github.com/liuran001/WeChat-LiquidGlass 别问我意义在哪,看到仓库里面有个小黑盒的就闲的没事做的😇
❤18
小米手机售后规则调整,明确二手产品 / 商品不属于三包范围 据用户反馈,小米手机的服务价格及服务政策迎来调整。在非保修条款中,不属于三包范围的情况明确新增「产品属于二手商品」(二手商品系指用户购买时为非全新的产品或者用户自闲置资源交流社区购买或其他二手平台购买或者产品经过回收)。 此外,服务权益和电池保也新增了类似说明,用户享有权益的手机,发生过任何回收业务、转售情况及赠予或转交第三方使用的也不能享受服务权益 / 电池保。 公开资料显示,三包政策是指销售者、修理者、生产者依据《中华人民共和国产品质量法》《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》等有关规定,应当承担部分商品的修理、更换、退货的责任和义务。消费者购买的产品出现以下情况,有权要求经销者承担三包责任。 1.不具备产品应当具备的使用性能,而事先没有说明的;2.不符合明示采用的产品标准要求;3.不符合以产品说明、实物样品等方式表明的质量状况;4.产品经技术监督行政部门等法定部门检…
🤮48👎10💩7🤡3👍2❤1
我们删除了老旧代码❌ 我们屏蔽了老旧入口✅ 还没屏蔽干净
😁28❤2
笔记的右上角弹出菜单,浅色模式是 miuix 图标,深色模式是 material 图标。AI 能写出这种代码么😳 #xiaomi #misc
🤣9❤1
关于邀请封测用户体验小米澎湃OS 4 Beta 版的说明 亲爱的Xiaomi miclaw 封测用户,大家好 为感谢大家参与 Xiaomi miclaw 封测,我们特别邀请大家体验小米澎湃OS 4 Beta 版。当您报名通过 miclaw 封测并使用的机型推送小米澎湃OS 4 Beta 版时,系统会为您推送相关版本,您可在“设置-我的设备-系统版本号”处点击检查更新。 请注意,由于 Xiaomi miclaw 不支持在小米澎湃OS 4版本使用,当前Xiaomi miclaw封测用户升级小米澎湃OS 4 Beta 版,将自动退出Xiaomi miclaw封测,如您需要继续使用Xiaomi miclaw,请停留在小米澎湃OS 3 的版本上。 如您当前暂无意愿继续体验小米澎湃OS 4 Beta 版,可在“小米社区-官方-内测中心-我的内测”点击相关项目退出。如您后续计划升级小米澎湃OS 4 Beta 版,可在“小米社区-官方-…
🤡22👍5
神了 我政审都没过,也没申请 突然说我过了
🤣27👍1😁1
近期无违规行为 不符合 金凡我操死你的妈 算了,反正直接偷渡
👍9😁2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @gjzsr_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“搞机助手·R 官方频道” (@gjzsr_channel), 15,783 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gjzsr_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.