#小米手环9 #小米手环9NFC #小米手环9陶瓷版 #n66tc V3.1.35 更新日志: • 1. 优化支付宝碰一下支付流程,支付更稳定 • 2. 修复已知问题,提升系统稳定性

Channel
Voyager HyperOS Update
@VoyagerMIUIUpdate
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,271subscribers
+2,429 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001718128483 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VoyagerMIUIUpdate |
| Description | MIUI/HyperOS提取&更新推送.请认真看置顶和文件说明 若安装提取版apk后出现问题请卸载更新甚至清除对应apk的全部数据 部分apk对于一些底层和系统版本会产生崩溃甚至导致系统出现黑屏等问题 若是不看注意导致出现了一些严重的后果,频道主概不负责 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VoyagerMIUIUpdate |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 23:48 | 22,271 | +19 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 06:08 | 22,252 | +12 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 18:11 | 22,240 | +23 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:07 | 22,217 | +26 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:11 | 22,191 | +12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:57 | 22,179 | +12 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:07 | 22,167 | +12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:25 | 22,155 | +11 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:58 | 22,144 | +20 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:00 | 22,124 | +11 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:10 | 22,113 | +14 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 17:11 | 22,099 | +15 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 22,084 | +19 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 11:14 | 22,065 | +23 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:58 | 22,042 | +3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:26 | 22,039 | +12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 22,027 | +12 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 22,015 | +11 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 10:47 | 22,004 | +20 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:49 | 21,984 | first reading |
Engagement
540 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.22%
- avg views ÷ 22,271 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,610
- 150 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.311%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 155
- of 540 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 144 of 150 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 540 (3 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 241,218 |
| Reactions total | 737 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,650
- Videos
- ≈35
- Links
- ≈7,940
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 43s
- Average length
- 43s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,236 reactions across 477 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,918 | 59.3% | |
| ❤ | 865 | 26.7% | |
| 🤩 | 115 | 3.55% | |
| 🥰 | 109 | 3.37% | |
| 🎉 | 74 | 2.29% | |
| 😁 | 62 | 1.92% | |
| 🤔 | 43 | 1.33% | |
| 😱 | 29 | 0.896% | |
| 😢 | 21 | 0.649% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 485 of the 540 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,236 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 540 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 16 of 155 posts held from the last 30 days (10.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#浏览器 #Browser #商店推送 推送机型:#Mi17ProMax #popsicle 系统版本:#正式版 target api:35 min api:28 arm64-v8a, armeabi-v7a 浏览器目前通道很多,仅留档(比如 API 和支持插件等存在区别)如果要使用扩展程序请使用这个通道的版本 浏览器内核版本:135.0.7049.79 更新日志: 优化已知问题
👍2
#下载管理 #Downloads #商店推送 推送机型:#Mi17ProMax #popsicle 系统版本:#OS4 #正式版 target api:35 minapi:26 arm64-v8a, armeabi-v7a 更新日志: 修复已知问题,提升稳定性
👍3
#米家 #Mi_Home #商店推送 target api:36 min api:24 arm64-v8a 更新日志: 优化: •设备共享流程的体验
👍3
#小米视频 #Mi_Video #商店推送 target api:33 min api:26 arm64-v8a v2026111190(MiVideo-UN))
👍2
#小游戏服务 #商店推送 推送机型:#Mi17Ultra #nezha target api:37 min api:29 arm64-v8a, armeabi-v7a 1.31.5.7(13150701) 更新日志: 1.优化游戏性能,体验更流畅丝滑 2.小窗体验优化 3.修复崩溃问题
👍3
#小米手环10 #小米手环10NFC #小米手环10陶瓷特别版 #o66tc #o66nfc #V3.1.33 更新日志: 欢迎使用 Xiaomi Smart Band 10,感谢您的支持。为了提升体验,我们推荐您升级至此版本。本次版本升级新增多个功能,升级资源较大,整体升级时间较长,请耐心等待。 • 优化功耗策略,设备更省电,续航更持久。 • 修复已知问题,增强系统稳定性,改善用户体验。
👍7
#应用程序扩展服务 #提取版 #Application_Extension_Service 提取机型:#mi15 #dada 系统版本:#OS4 #正式版 #4030 target api:35 min api:29 无原生库 5.1.8 (520261012) ⚠️⚠️⚠️ 仅限 OS4 安装,OS3 不要碰 Only for OS4 installation; do not touch OS3
👍6
#小米服务框架 #商店推送 #Xiaomi_service_framework target api:33 min api:28 arm64-v8a, armeabi-v7a xxhdpi 版本 从 7.5.32 起,适配 OS 4 更新日志: “提升稳定性”
👍5
#PC #Windows #Win11 #小爱同学 #小米妙享 #超级小爱 #HyperOS4 版本号:3.6.1.418 适配 HyperOS 4 官网 官方直链 更新日志: 小米笔记PC版 优化专家模式积分消耗 修复已知问题,优化稳定性
❤6👍1
#米家 #iOS #iPadOS #macOS App Store 推送了正式版 V11.10.200.360 更新日志: 优化: •设备共享流程的体验
👍2
#小米音箱 #商店推送 target api:35 min api:24 arm64-v8a, armeabi-v7a 近期已适配 OS4 UI 风格和新底栏 更新日志: 【体验优化】 设备Tab改版:单设备用户直达设备详情页,并优化详情页布局让提醒功能首屏可见。 【问题修复】 修复部分已知问题,提升系统流畅度和稳定性。
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 540 posts we hold for @VoyagerMIUIUpdate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@VoyagerMIUIUpdate edited 13 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 12 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cemiuiler_canary · 21,498
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 4 October 2026
@scene2023 · 57,569
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 September 2026
@cemiuiler_release · 28,046
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 September 2026
@real5ec1cff · 40,136
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 2 September 2026
@nullptr_dev · 21,470
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 28 September 2026
@FlClash · 54,302
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 28 August 2026
@magiskalpha · 66,542
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 21 August 2026
@HideMyApplist · 42,193
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 30 August 2026
@QToolCI · 50,216
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 September 2026
@LSPosed · 201,624
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 17 August 2026
@biliroaming · 56,376
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 September 2026
@MatsuriDayo · 45,738
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026
@NagramTips · 52,085
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 30 August 2026
@APatchChannel · 26,027
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 14 September 2026
@miui10themes · 24,715
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 September 2026
@LSPosedArchives · 27,192
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 14 September 2026
@QAuxiliary_CI · 19,689
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 1 October 2026
@miuithemevn · 32,148
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 6 September 2026
@mi_upds · 42,195
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 29 August 2026
@NPatch · 20,033
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 2 October 2026
@Mi_Global_Community · 28,852
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 9 September 2026
@TECH_MUKUL · 31,731
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 6 September 2026
@XiaomiFirmwareUpdater · 27,443
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 10 September 2026
@LuckyTool · 31,335
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Voyager HyperOS Update” (@VoyagerMIUIUpdate), 22,271 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VoyagerMIUIUpdate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.