⚠️ #پنالتی راحترین بازی پولساز ⚠️ 🔥 حتما ویدیو آموزشی بالا روببینید راحتو سریع برنده شو👌🏼 💖 مرجع بازی های روز دنیا در پلتفرم جهانی بت اینجا ⭐

Channel
فودوشین | بیکلام
@Phodoshin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
150,751subscribers
-906 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001852482841 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Phodoshin |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Phodoshin |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 150,751 | -110 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 150,861 | -109 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 150,970 | -125 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 151,095 | -93 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 151,188 | -117 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 151,305 | -80 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 151,385 | -74 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 151,459 | -91 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 151,550 | -75 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 151,625 | -66 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 151,691 | +34 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 151,657 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:21 | 151,657 | first reading |
Engagement
164 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.66%
- avg views ÷ 150,751 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,510
- 164 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.60%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 164
- of 164 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 114 of 164 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 164 (5 August 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 411,233 |
| Reactions total | 5,041 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 15m 53s
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,041 reactions across 107 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,153 | 42.7% | |
| 👍 | 1,543 | 30.6% | |
| 💔 | 1,239 | 24.6% | |
| 😢 | 106 | 2.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 114 of the 164 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,041reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 164 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⚽️ آقاآآ این بازی #پنالتی چقدر خفنه⚽ 🟢 بازی خیلی حرفه ای و #پولساز پنالتی فقط پلتفرم جهانی و معتبر #بت_اینجا ✊همین الان ویدیو #آموزش پنالتی زدن رو ببین و با شارژ اضافی 🤩🤩 درصدی که سایت بهت میده. 💖 حتما ویدیو #آموزش رو ببینید 💻لینک سایت بازی: 💻 betinja.bet 💻 betinja.bet 🌐 کانال بونوس های رایگان a27 @betinjabet
موزیک - بیکلام این بیکلام رو پلی کن و امروز اگه برات روز خوبی بود حتما یه جایی بنویسش تا هروقت که خوندیش لبخند به لبت بیاد... @Phodoshin | #بیکلام
عزیزِ من ، تقصیر تو نیست! زمانه ما زمانهای شده که باشعور به خاطر شعورش سکوت میکنه و بعد بیشعور با خودش میگه که دیدی چه جوری ساکتش کردم؟! موضوع ذات آدمه، ما هرچقدر سطل زباله رو تمیز کنیم و توش گل بکاریم بازم سطل زباله ایه که توش گل کاشتیم...! 📚 بیشعوری - خاویر کرمنت ؛@Phodoshin
👍27❤10
همیشه چیزهایی که نداشتهام را بسیار دوست داشته ام، همچون تو که بسیار دوری، که بسیار ندارمت...! ❖ فودوشین 🪷
❤11💔10👍2
🇩🇪آپ اندروید سایت جهانی Melbet💥 🎁بونوس ورزشی هر چهارشنبه🔥 💸واریز و برداشت متنوع💵 ⭕️بدون نیاز به فیلتر شکن⭕️ 🎁کد هدیه ثبت نام Melbet90 ✌️ ✔https://t.me/+x60dZGAgXTUxM2U0
🎲سایت جهانی و معتبر #Melbet 🔴 بازی های مهم 27 مرداد 🆗ثبت نام آسان و سریع کلیک کنید🆗 ✅🤩🤩🤩🤩 بونوس اولین واریز ✅پخش زنده ی تمام مسابقات ✅درگاه اختصاصی برای کاربران 👍 پشتیبانی 24 ساعته فارسی 🎟Promo Code: MELBET90 🇩🇪دانلود اپلیکیشن MELBET📱 🔗لینک وبسایت👉 ⭕️جهت استفاده از vpn از IP های آسیایی یا کانادا استفاده کنید.🇨🇦 🇹🇷 g27 ✔ https://t.me/+x60dZGAgXTUxM2U0
«آلن دوباتن یه جمله قشنگی داره که میگه؛ همسری که واقعا بهش نیاز داریم کسی نیست که تو همه سلایق و علایق با ما مشترک باشه، بلکه کسیِ که یه روح مهربونی داره که یاد گرفته با فروتنی و جستجوگری درباره اختلاف سلیقهها مذاکره کنه» @Phodoshin
👍37❤21
گرچه همه چیز میگذرد اما آدم تا همیشه برای برخی اتفاقات غمگین میماند...! ❖ فودوشین 🪷
❤25💔15👍13
⚠️ #پیشنهاد_ویژه ⚠️ 🔥 حتما ویدیو آموزشی بالا روببینید بازی ساده و بسیار شیرینی که راحت میشه میشه ازش کلی پول درآورد👌🏼 دنیای سرگرمی و بازی های جذاب رو در ایناپلیکیشن تجربه کنید⭐
🖱به راحتی کسب درامد کن 💵💰 🟢 ویدیو #آموزش بازی chicky choice رو براتون گذاشتم خیلی راحت و بدون ریسک و میتونی بازی کنی و کلی پول دربیاری🔥 💖 حتما ویدیو رو تا انتها ببینید 😅😂😆 : 💻 betinja.bet 💻 betinja.bet 🌐 کانال بونوس های رایگان r27 @betinjabet
👑فقط کافیه مرغ از خیابون رد کنی و پولت چند برابر کنی راحت💵👌
Showing the 12 most recent of 164 posts we hold for @Phodoshin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@iMTProto · 7,458,745#1
@darkproxy · 4,949,042#2
@proxy_qavi · 3,552,806#3
@Afkar · 998,404#4
@Radiokocsher · 652,570#5
@howtlisten · 339,938#6
@tajvizAngize · 307,107#7
@Zahne_Aram · 251,900#8
@Herochnl · 340,425#9
@classicthemes · 438,413#10
@Comentiat · 330,929#11
@Comentive · 202,926#12
@MTProxyStar · 1,988,480#13
@timemoodz1 · 342#14
@vahm_sabz · 154,764#15
@sogoandfuckyourlove · 525,507#16
@kianaafr · 402,880#17
@Green_Genius · 227,323#18
@nulluschnll · 74,268#19
@ProxyHagh · 403,662#20
@Blue_library · 270,975#21
@TheShear · 180,005#22
@NoteChnll · 116,326#23
@cactos · 264,232#24
@HiProxy · 248,059#25
@Maagas · 655,435#26
@waallkman · 132,875#27
@LikeeMusix · 543,767#28
@CommentMelat · 280,676#29
@liwish · 174,584#30
@Danshjuyar · 60,641#31
@Nabz_e_shear · 146,702#32
@Teen_Text · 143,697#33
@factaname · 139,906#34
@KeTabatun · 70,567#35
@UnNurmal · 556,020#36
@herwonderland · 20#37
@Rohiyat · 100,715#38
@luxury_baash · 88,458#39
@SoulofDream · 168,857#40
@ide_food · 424,406#41
@LittlePrinceChnl · 56,278#42
@iRoProxy · 7,858,718#43
@RegaPlus · 1,451,331#44
@futballbadtv · 326,580#45
@CottageOrg · 822,877#46
@bistodo · 399,827#47
@razcom · 1,257,485#48
@proxydaemi · 1,767,170#49
@varzesh3 · 1,293,860#50
@TweetyChannel · 776,557#51
@roidbest · 1,669,065#52
@Bahmanbekesh · 204,724#53
@hamclasixii · 839,397#54
@vaarzesh_plus · 352,134#55
@ir_javan · 637,165#56
@MemeHubOriginal · 100,503#57
@ocbooks · 319,838#58
@Daneshjoo · 408#59
@meme_ol_ski · 226,376#60
@ParsTwt · 531,581#61
@NPROXY · 2,531,530#62
@tweet_Khabari · 658,673#63
@kafiha · 695,781#64
@wallpaper_4k3d · 558,306#65
@lwall_3Dl · 192,753#66
@PyroProxy · 429,349#67
@ReadingLand · 111,969#68
@Churchill_Tahlil · 250,384#69
@unja_kee · 378,801#70
@TheoryTopia · 71,080#71
@Eternity_Chnl · 60,404#72
@wallpapercolorv · 101,059#73
@Duchar · 203,304#74
@akhbar_fori6 · 374,448#75
@HashtMin · 101,905#76
@Caption · 235,560#77
@najvashear · 70,658#78
@proxymtproto · 11,956,546#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ideZibaye · 96,084
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 16 August 2026
@lady_eel · 104,468
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
@TajvizeKetab · 101,802
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 August 2026
@jalebequize · 107,935
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فودوشین | بیکلام” (@Phodoshin), 150,751 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Phodoshin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.