Channel
@iNteRvaAl
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
19,714subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001350830737 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iNteRvaAl |
| Description | 🌿نفس بكش؛ عميق، آرام، شادمان، بگو غم رد شود كه قلبت آرامگاهِ اندوه نيست.✨ کپیِ محتوا فقط جهت استفاده شخصی بلامانع میباشد😈 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iNteRvaAl |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 19,714 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 19,713 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 19,714 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 19,722 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 19,715 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 19,714 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 19,712 | +12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:10 | 19,700 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 19,702 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 19,702 | first reading |
81 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 80 of 81 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 81 (3 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 105,238 |
| Reactions total | 2,946 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,449 reactions across 68 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,279 | 52.2% | |
| 🤝 | 565 | 23.1% | |
| 😁 | 353 | 14.4% | |
| 🍓 | 121 | 4.94% | |
| 🕊 | 87 | 3.55% | |
| 🍾 | 44 | 1.80% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,946reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
همه چی گرونه. همه جارو هوش مصنوعی گرفته. هوا گرمه. همه دارن شبیه همدیگه میشن و برده ترندها شدن. وقتی یکی حرف میزنه کاملا متوجه میشی کدوم ریل اینستا رو دیده، همه با همدیگه دعوا دارن و این زیادی خسته کننده شده.🫴🏽
🤝21
- با جرعهای ز بوی تو، از خویش میروم:)🤤❤️🔥
😁7❤4🍾1
این زاویهی فک چی بود افتاد به جون مردم؟ همه دارن لوزی و مربع میشن...🫥
❤19😁15🍾1
نشستیم داریم فیلم میبینیم، مامانم یهو تصمیم میگیره وسطش پاشه بره یه زندگی رو سر و سامون بده، خب زن بشین ببین بعد برو به کارات برس. ذلهم کردی.😩
😁34❤3🤝1
- اجازه بده ریتم نفسات منظم بشه و آروم بشی، چشمات زیباییها رو ببینه و نفسات عمیق و تمیز بشه، چند لحظه زندگی کن:)🌿☁️🧘🏻♀
❤15
- آیه های مجرب جذبِ ثروت و رزق : @ZekrDoaa 🤩💵 - دعاهای بازگشتِ معشوق و گمشده @ZekrDoaa 🥲🤍 ----------------------------- ⤸🪴پروکسی 𝗩𝗣𝗡 @proxyporsoat ⤸🍉کتاب موزیک شعر @cafesiiah ⤸🪴آهنگشاد 𝟮𝟬𝟮5 @music_remixshad ⤸🍉کپشن انگیزشی/Bio @Takkhati3672 ⤸🪴تاثیر نام در سرنوشت؟ @KoOdkEYHani888 ⤸🍉استوری تولد @tavalodtavalod99 ⤸🪴من امیدوار مینویسه @abrak_tweet ⤸🍉میکاپ مدل مو @ModeWorld_mag2 ⤸🪴عکسـآی کیـوت | بهـآرونـه @NabatNevis ⤸🍉ترف…
❤1
جالبه که از یه جایی به بعد دوست داشتن دیگه توی جملههای بزرگ خلاصه نمیشه. میشه فرستادن یه عکس رندوم از آسمون، تعریف کردن یه فکت بیربط، یادآوری اینکه امشب شام خوردی یا نه، یا گفتنِ «رسیدی؟» بدون اینکه واقعاً لازم باشه بپرسی. انگار علاقه، هرچی بیشتر میگذره، آرومتر میشه ولی ریشهدارتر.✨🤍
❤27🤝1
- کوتاه براتون آرزو کنم: امیدوارم قلبتو پیش آدمی جا بذاری که عقلت تا ابد تاییدش کنه:)☕️🪔🫧
❤20
از وقتی قند رو حذف کردم، 80% اخلاقم رو از دست دادم...🥴
😁25❤5
🔴 7 ربات تلگرامی کاربردی رایگان که خیلی بدردتون میخوره(حتما یجا ذخیره کنید بکارتون میاد) 1. ربات دانلود از اینستاگرام InstagramBot 2. ربات دانلود از یوتیوب YouTubeBot 3. ربات دانلود از اسپاتیفای و ساندکلود SongDlBot 4. ربات دانلود از توییتر XDlBot 5. ربات دانلود از پینترست PinterestBot 6. ربات دانلود از تیک تاک TikTokBot 7. تبدیل فایل به لینک دانلود FileToLink
❤4
طوری رفتار میکنم که انگار اهمیتی نمیدم ولی در واقع حسودترین، حواسجمعترین و اورثینکرترین و دیوونهترین آدمیم که وجود داره.🦦
🤝35❤7
- ما را به جز تو؛ (بعدِ باشگاه) در همه عالم عزیز نیست^^🥤🥙
❤20🍓3🍾2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @iNteRvaAl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 144,775 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 90 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@iNteRvaAl named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“• iNteRvaAl •💫” (@iNteRvaAl), 19,714 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iNteRvaAl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.