هورنیت کنم پسرمممم :))))🤤

Channel
Demure | تکست مود
@bedemure
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
126,709subscribers
-1,502 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001720664216 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bedemure |
| Description | ؛ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bedemure |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 126,709 | -136 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 126,845 | -174 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 127,019 | -175 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 127,194 | -141 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 127,335 | -153 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 127,488 | -191 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:41 | 127,679 | -231 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 127,910 | -224 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 128,134 | -77 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 128,211 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 128,211 | first reading |
Engagement
298 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.38%
- avg views ÷ 126,709 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,010
- 298 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 298
- of 298 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 298 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 298 (6 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 897,143 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,210
- Videos
- ≈1,070
- Links
- ≈1,460
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 41s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 298 we hold a reading for · 0.7%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bedemure. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 298 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
لباتو بخورم پسرم :)))) 👅
لاس تحریکی سکسی 🤤🤤
لباتو بخورم پسر مامان و کوفت هنوز عین عهد بوق لاس میزنی ؟! اخه تباه بیا اینجا با لاساش دوس پسرتو خیس کن: @lasss 🤤🤤
لاسای این چنل به حدی هاتن که دوس پسرم خودشو میکشه برام :)) @love
حسودی که هست ولی علاقهام رو هم از دست میدم، وقتی هر خری راحت بتونه بهت دسترسی داشته باشه عزیزم.
وقتی ازم میپرسن زبان عشقت چیه نمیتونم بگم آدمها رو از خودم دور میکنم که ببینم برای نگه داشتنم میجنگن یا نه، پس میگم حرفهای محبت آمیز و اطمینان بخش.
زمانى میرسد در زندگیتان كه از جريان زندگی تشكر خواهيد كرد، براى تمام رابطههايى كه ميخواستيد و به سرانجام نرسيد، براى تمام موقعيتهايى كه ميخواستيد اما به دست نياورديد و براى تمام انسانهايى كه ميخواستيد اما نماندند.
گریه؟ نه مرسی مودترین تکستای دنیا رو میخونم: @Mood
سرم شلوغه ولی حواسم بهت هست، سرگرم کارم هستم ولی حواسم بهت هست، ازت دورم ولی حواسم بهت هست، نیستی ولی حواسم بهت هست، تو برای همیشه مال من بمون، منم همیشه حواسم بهت هست.
وقتی که همه جوره عاشقشی تو بغلش پلی کن. 🎨 Demure
من هیچوقت دختری رو که بخاطر افتادن یه قاشق روی زمین سه ساعت گریه میکنه رو قضاوت نمیکنم چون هردومون میدونیم ماجرا اصلا فقط یه قاشق نبوده.
Showing the 12 most recent of 298 posts we hold for @bedemure. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 821,856 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@DerbyBet_official · 3,73910 postsApple News
@iphone · 152,0232 postsRitzoBet Iran 🇮🇷
@Ritzobet_ir · 39,6182 postsلینک ورود به چنل اصلی
@Daneshjoo · 4081 postFind Anything 🔍 Instantly NO1
@Find_Anything_Instantly_1 · 31,2681 postمل بت
@melbet_chaneel · 49,7721 post❗PAD SHOP❗
@padshop · 11 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@bedemure named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@iDeathBirth · 81#1
@iRoProxy · 7,848,745#2
@liwish · 174,677#3
@sogoandfuckyourlove · 524,870#4
@irobah · 22,312#5
@Duchar · 203,173#6
@MasteMaqmom · 26,459#7
@iMTProto · 7,453,149#8
@havaliafkaram · 21,523#9
@RegaPlus · 1,450,095#10
@iciou · 261,513#11
@tavahomte · 33,270#12
@Rlighthere · 136,500#13
@darkproxy · 4,969,329#14
@d_Rhyshkrdi · 113,189#15
@pinkCiggar · 31,764#16
@hawwne · 10,360 (as read 13 August 2026)#17
@WryVur · 134,620#18
@proxy_qavi · 3,567,629#19
@idiewith · 171,764#20
@Codeain · 334,238#21
@Afkar · 999,587#22
@samepov · 45,816#23
@timemoodz1 · 342#24
@im403error · 43,016#25
@yourperfuumm · 61,509#26
@coucoa · 591#27
@Rohiyat · 100,835#28
@initiatur · 188,550#29
@GaArea · 51,325#30
@rapking · 307,911#31
@xbeus · 19,151#32
@Amyraly · 116,942#33
@Xunsent · 115,458#34
@letskills · 68,415#35
@proxydaemi · 1,767,942#36
@boyafterU · 4,919 (as read 13 August 2026)#37
@isoolatedw · 5,410#38
@siasefidofficial · 193,446#39
@Lyricsteach · 40,767#40
@MakeYourCharacter · 856#41
@spiiderclown · 85,868#42
@ShiyareMaqzam · 85,999#43
@TweetyChannel · 777,219#44
@iDontSayThis · 4,823#45
@phtneh · 8,931 (as read 13 August 2026)#46
@Bi_toh · 3,660#47
@dismaying · 132,512#48
@SaeidBaratpour · 89,713#49
@rebccaghaderi · 268,737#50
@minemetanoia · 4#51
@sigwhar · 4,550#52
@winstnchannel · 159,107#53
@ashkan_kagan · 117,923#54
@ParsTwt · 533,822#55
@baraop8 · 3,321 (as read 13 August 2026)#56
@howtlisten · 340,414#57
@MonaLisach · 89,487#58
@mexxyoux · 100,888#59
@Biography_khas1 · 176,944#60
@hamclasixii · 840,764#61
@classicthemes · 439,390#62
@YouBgo · 102,294#63
@Sickliy · 33,282#64
@crayingroom · 288,117#65
@xFades · 100,316#66
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Zhakav_Chnnel · 136,652
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
@Duchar · 203,173
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 August 2026
@DarkRome · 157,185
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
@x0505xi · 104,833
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@Rohiyat · 100,835
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
@offnot · 105,746
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@d_Rhyshkrdi · 113,189
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@liwish · 174,677
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
@siasefidofficial · 193,446
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@winstnchannel · 159,107
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
@Srylove · 229,054
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
@vazeiyatsefid · 147,861
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
@timemoodz1 · 342
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 August 2026
@lady_eel · 104,609
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
@Onissm · 464,668
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
@EveryPov · 244,900
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
@Loveleam · 142,611
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
@dismaying · 132,512
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
@sogoandfuckyourlove · 524,870
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 August 2026
@barcod · 169,595
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
@DAARKKHEART · 120,861
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 August 2026
@Ashoftegi_official · 147,214
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 August 2026
@Green_Genius · 228,545
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
@Sheerreno · 230,362
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Demure | تکست مود” (@bedemure), 126,709 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bedemure.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.