Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for N๐ŸŒVAX di Riccardo Fortin

Channel

N๐ŸŒVAX di Riccardo Fortin

@nvacs

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

14,660subscribers

-103 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001661422448
TypeChannel
Username@nvacs
Created7 January 2022 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nvacs

Topic

Politics & activism โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,66014,76314,711.56 August 2026 โ€” 14,763 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 14,763 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 14,761 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 14,759 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 14,757 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 14,755 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 14,754 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 14,750 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 14,745 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 14,742 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 14,739 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 14,734 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 14,733 subscribers21 August 2026 โ€” 14,734 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 14,736 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 14,726 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 14,722 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 14,724 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 14,722 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 14,717 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 14,709 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 14,710 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 14,706 subscribers3 September 2026 โ€” 14,705 subscribers5 September 2026 โ€” 14,696 subscribers9 September 2026 โ€” 14,685 subscribers11 September 2026 โ€” 14,679 subscribers13 September 2026 โ€” 14,672 subscribers15 September 2026 โ€” 14,666 subscribers17 September 2026 โ€” 14,665 subscribers25 September 2026 โ€” 14,660 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 51 days, net -103. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 14,645โ€“14,778 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 22:2214,660-5
17 Sept 2026, 07:3714,665-1
15 Sept 2026, 05:3814,666-6
13 Sept 2026, 15:3714,672-7
11 Sept 2026, 16:4114,679-6
9 Sept 2026, 01:3914,685-11
5 Sept 2026, 21:1514,696-9
3 Sept 2026, 19:2014,705-1
2 Sept 2026, 08:0514,706-4
1 Sept 2026, 09:3314,710+1
31 Aug 2026, 10:0414,709-8
29 Aug 2026, 13:3514,717-5
28 Aug 2026, 16:1714,722-2
26 Aug 2026, 15:5614,724+2
25 Aug 2026, 12:2214,722-4
24 Aug 2026, 15:0814,726-10
22 Aug 2026, 20:2514,736+2
21 Aug 2026, 11:5914,734+1
19 Aug 2026, 11:5714,733-1
18 Aug 2026, 15:0314,734first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
11.3%
avg views รท 14,660 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,660
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.93%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held44 (18 July 2026 โ€“ 1 September 2026)
Views total6,649
Reactions total328
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30m 28s
Average length
1m 31s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

3,599 reactions across 44 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ‘1,08530.1%
๐Ÿ‘1,08030.0%
โค61317.0%
๐Ÿ”ฅ44612.4%
๐Ÿ˜802.22%
โšก681.89%
๐Ÿ™651.81%
๐Ÿ’ฏ581.61%
๐Ÿ˜ฑ511.42%
๐Ÿฅฐ150.417%
๐Ÿ†100.278%
๐Ÿ‘Œ100.278%
๐Ÿ“50.139%
๐Ÿพ40.111%
๐Ÿ’”40.111%
๐Ÿคฉ20.056%
๐Ÿ’‹10.028%
๐Ÿ•Š10.028%
๐Ÿ˜10.028%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 3,599 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 18:51 UTC999 views64 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @TeodoriLucaLCVPhoto

Gli inglesi godono nel vedere l'italiana che vuol fare la tedesca (e tradisce il proprio Paese).

๐Ÿ”ฅ41โšก11๐Ÿ‘8๐Ÿ‘4

Signed Riccardo Fortin

31 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTCโ‰ˆ2,270 views72 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

๐Ÿ”ด MILIARDI PER IL RIARMO DEBITI PER GLI ITALIANI ๐Ÿ”ด #IOVOTONOVAX

๐Ÿ‘57๐Ÿ‘11โค2๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ˜1

Signed Riccardo Fortin

30 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTCโ‰ˆ1,460 views115 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @TeodoriLucaLCVPhoto

C'รˆ CHI DICE NO. ๐Ÿ“ŒIn Islanda il 53%, anche alla semplice ipotesi di aprire una trattativa negoziale per l'adesione alla UE, dice no! NOVAX PROPONE: 1 L'USCITA DALLA UE 2 IL RITORNO ALLA LIRA 3 L'EMISSIONE DI UNA MONETA SOVRANA 4 UNA BANCA CENTRALE NAZIONALE E SOTTO IL TESORO 5 NESSUNA ADESIONE A SISTEMI DI CAMBI FISSI 6 LA SEPARAZIONE TRA BANCHE DI RISPARMIO E BANCHE SPECULATIVE 7 RIPRISTINO DI BANCHE PUBBLICHE QUALIโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘83๐Ÿ‘20โค10๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ˜1

Signed Riccardo Fortin

29 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTCโ‰ˆ1,920 views77 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Di Battista

โค40๐Ÿ™22๐Ÿ‘11โšก4

Signed Riccardo Fortin

27 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTCโ‰ˆ3,180 views121 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

๐Ÿ”ด E SE FOSSE STATA UNA TURISTA PROVENIENTE DA UNO DI QUESTI 17 PAESI EUROPEI SENZA OBBLIGO VACCINALE? ๐Ÿ”ด #IOVOTONOVAX

๐Ÿ‘82๐Ÿ‘32๐Ÿ’ฏ5โค1๐Ÿ˜1

Signed Riccardo Fortin

27 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTCโ‰ˆ2,470 views122 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @nicolafranzoniVideo

#iovotonovax Dopo l'impressionante campagna vaccinale susseguita alla tragica scomparsa di una bambina di 4 anni, ennesimo flop dei professionisti e giornalai della disinformazione: a Palermo, citta' con oltre 500 mila abitanti, le virostar e il Governo raggranellano un magro risultato: solo 78 vaccinazioni in piu'. Quando entreremo in Parlamento verra' recisa quella catena di comando che impegna tutta la politica eโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘80๐Ÿ‘33โค4๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿ˜2

Signed Riccardo Fortin

27 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTCโ‰ˆ2,090 views40 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @TeodoriLucaLCVPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘34โค5๐Ÿ˜1

Signed Riccardo Fortin

26 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTCโ‰ˆ4,370 views111 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

๐Ÿ”ด LA SALUTE DI UN BAMBINO NON PUร’ DIPENDERE DAL SUO STATO VACCINALE ๐Ÿ”ด

๐Ÿ‘94๐Ÿ‘9โค7๐Ÿ˜1

Signed Riccardo Fortin

26 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTCโ‰ˆ2,500 views101 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘62โค23๐Ÿ‘15๐Ÿ˜1

Signed Riccardo Fortin

24 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTCโ‰ˆ3,030 views141 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Mi รจ stato chiesto perchรฉ io non abbia ancora parlato del caso della bambina morta a Palermo per sospetta difterite. La risposta รจ molto semplice: perchรฉ io, prima di parlare di una vicenda cosรฌ grave, voglio avere tutti gli elementi. Al momento non ho ancora tutti i termini per poterlo fare. C'รจ chi dice che la bambina non fosse vaccinata, c'รจ chi dice invece che lo fosse. Si dice inoltre che la difterite non sia stโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘78๐Ÿ‘31โค18๐Ÿ’ฏ11๐Ÿ˜3

Signed Riccardo Fortin

21 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTCโ‰ˆ3,430 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜16๐Ÿ‘6โค1๐Ÿ‘1

Signed Riccardo Fortin

21 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTCโ‰ˆ3,420 views74 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘46๐Ÿ‘18โค9๐Ÿ˜1

Signed Riccardo Fortin

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @nvacs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

๐—”๐—ก๐——๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—” ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—”๐—ง๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ข๐—™๐—™๐—œ๐—–๐—œ๐—”๐—Ÿ
@AndreaTosattoOfficial ยท 23,617
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here โ€” alongside 80 others โ€” read 18 September 2026
Canale Comitato Fortitudo
@comitatofortitudo ยท 52,492
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here โ€” alongside 80 others โ€” read 24 August 2026
Roberto Nuzzo ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ
@robertonuzzocanale ยท 21,321
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here โ€” alongside 72 others โ€” read 24 September 2026
IppocrateOrg
@IppocrateOrg ยท 34,457
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here โ€” alongside 78 others โ€” read 3 September 2026
Matteo Gracis
@matteogracis ยท 144,125
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here โ€” alongside 93 others โ€” read 17 August 2026
Amore Veritร  Libertร 
@Diegodibonito ยท 35,652
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 70 here โ€” alongside 69 others โ€” read 23 September 2026
RA/Avv. DDr. Renate Holzeisen
@renateholzeisen ยท 33,766
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here โ€” alongside 75 others โ€” read 3 September 2026
Davide Zedda (Giornalista libero e indipendente. Libero pensiero, libera informazione e controinformazione)
@davide_zedda ยท 59,703
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here โ€” alongside 84 others โ€” read 22 August 2026
Raffaella Regoli canale ufficiale
@RaffaellaRegoli ยท 47,268
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here โ€” alongside 89 others โ€” read 26 August 2026
Sir Red Ronnie
@RedRonnieTv ยท 32,885
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 75 here โ€” alongside 74 others โ€” read 4 September 2026
La Veritร  ci Rende Liberi e ci Fa Incazzare
@Laveritacirendeliberiecifaincazz ยท 26,896
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here โ€” alongside 75 others โ€” read 11 September 2026
La nuova normalitร 
@lanuovanormalita ยท 34,799
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here โ€” alongside 81 others โ€” read 3 September 2026
Silver Nervuti
@silvernervuti ยท 42,447
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 81 here โ€” alongside 80 others โ€” read 29 August 2026
La Voce Libera ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ˆ
@la_voce_libera ยท 26,778
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here โ€” alongside 77 others โ€” read 11 September 2026
ZAINZ ๐Ÿบ Canale Ufficiale ZainzTv
@zainztv ยท 51,505
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here โ€” alongside 88 others โ€” read 24 August 2026
Andrea Colombini Official Channel
@andreacolombini ยท 83,067
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here โ€” alongside 88 others โ€” read 18 August 2026
Dr. BARBARA BALANZONI (qui doc, video, audio,foto)
@drbarbarabalanzoni ยท 69,936
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here โ€” alongside 86 others โ€” read 20 August 2026
Marco Mori
@marcomoriofficial ยท 22,265
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 80 here โ€” alongside 79 others โ€” read 21 September 2026
Avv. Mauro Sandri
@Avv_Mauro_Sandri_MODULI ยท 48,480
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 76 here โ€” alongside 75 others โ€” read 3 September 2026
Buffonate di Stato
@buffonatedistato ยท 74,497
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here โ€” alongside 86 others โ€” read 19 August 2026
ALI - Avvocati Liberi
@avvocati_liberi ยท 21,322
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 79 here โ€” alongside 78 others โ€” read 24 September 2026
LA VERITร€ RENDE LIBERI
@Giovanni832 ยท 26,103
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 78 here โ€” alongside 77 others โ€” read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œN๐ŸŒVAX di Riccardo Fortinโ€ (@nvacs), 14,660 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nvacs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.