Официальный канал Support Partners
(aka HR Talk)
Мы познали HR.
«В работе» — это про состояние, в котором находится бизнес. И, честно говоря, это единственное состояние, в котором есть смысл что-то обсуждать.
По всем вопросам — @iamshilov
Created
17 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
10 measurements spanning 11 days, net -70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,265–15,356 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 12:49
15,275
-1
16 Aug 2026, 06:45
15,276
-5
14 Aug 2026, 17:57
15,281
-9
13 Aug 2026, 05:56
15,290
-9
12 Aug 2026, 07:12
15,299
-17
11 Aug 2026, 08:12
15,316
-12
9 Aug 2026, 08:41
15,328
-5
8 Aug 2026, 09:32
15,333
-4
7 Aug 2026, 10:26
15,337
-8
6 Aug 2026, 10:48
15,345
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.52%
avg views ÷ 15,275 subscribers
Avg views / post
690
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
35 (30 July 2026 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
24,162
Reactions total
252
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,630
Videos
≈132
Links
≈2,260
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
20s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
252 reactions across 31 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
77
30.6%
🔥
70
27.8%
❤
62
24.6%
🤝
11
4.37%
😁
9
3.57%
👌
5
1.98%
🏆
4
1.59%
👏
4
1.59%
💯
4
1.59%
🐳
2
0.794%
🤣
2
0.794%
❤🔥
1
0.397%
🤔
1
0.397%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В Fortune разбирают интересную мысль профессора Маркуса Коллинза из Университета штата Мичигана: компании часто путают ценности и убеждения.
Ценности — это, что мы считаем важным. Убеждения — то, как мы на самом деле видим мир. И именно убеждения определяют культуру.
Например, компания может публично декларировать доверие и заботу о клиенте, но при этом строить систему вокруг убеждения: главное — выполнить план люб…
Недавно мы приглашали вас на уникальное событие — HR-cтендап, который устраивают наши друзья завтра в 18:00 на Таганке.
И сегодня для тех, кто зарегистрировался, но раздумывает идти или нет, есть еще одна причина посетить это вечер. Одним из людей, которые встанут за микрофон, станет Константин Борисов.
Не нам вам рассказывать, что такие вещи в этой жизни не пропускаются. Как говорится, кто знает, тот поймет.
И да…
В 2026 году компании тонут не в сложности. Они тонут в попытке управлять собой по-старому.
ИИ сократил стоимость запуска новых продуктов, цифровые экосистемы стерли отраслевые границы, количество одновременно идущих изменений постоянно растет. Вместе со всем этим растет и другая величина — координационная сложность.
Как мы знаем, цифровизация может не уменьшать хаос, а даже ускорять его. И если каждый ваш новый про…
#вакансии
Еженедельная подборка эксклюзивных вакансий недели, которую подписчики нашего канала получают всегда первыми.
Помогаем компаниям и людям найти друг друга.
Не забывайте делиться вакансиями — среди ваших друзей есть те, кому они сейчас могут пригодиться.
🟥 Подбор топ-руководителей
#кейс
Как заставить аналитиков импровизировать, когда время праздновать ещё не пришло
Наш клиент — крупнейший российский нефтегазовый холдинг — пришел с задачей: на календаре — не время для пышных торжеств, но перед стартом нового тяжелого сезона команде требуется мощная перезагрузка.
Главный вызов оказался в самой аудитории. Перед нами были сильные, системные аналитики и инженеры. Люди, привыкшие к строгим регламе…
До фестиваля «ПиР. Практики развития» осталось меньше месяца ❤️
10–13 сентября мы снова встречаемся в Сокольниках.
450+ выступлений, 17 параллельных секций и сотни спикеров — эксперты, руководители, предприниматели, HR и L&D-практики, тренеры, исследователи, люди из искусства и культуры.
Среди спикеров ПиРа-2026 — Дмитрий Петров, Радислав Гандапас, Татьяна Мужицкая, Аркадий Цукер, Никита Непряхин, Алёна Владимирска…
Недавно рассказывали вам об оценке сотрудниками компетентности своих руководителей. Сегодня у нас будет продолжение. В этот раз сотрудников попросили оценить уровень эмпатии их начальников. И как всегда цифры стали расходиться.
Новое исследование вскрыло серьезный разрыв между тем, как менеджеры видят себя, и тем, что о них думают подчиненные.
Главные цифры:
• Эмоциональный интеллект
56% руководителей уверены, что …
Миф или реальность: существует ли гендерный разрыв в зарплатах топ-менеджеров?
В новом материале «РБК Образование» вышло масштабное исследование о равенстве доходов мужчин и женщин. Статистика показывает, что на рынке в целом разница в зарплатах всё еще ощутима, а на руководящих позициях она достигает пика.
Но так ли это устроено на уровне топ-менеджмента и реальных офферов?
Основатель и генеральный директор Suppo…
#кейс
Один из крупнейших агрохолдингов страны искал Директора по производству, который возглавит работу площадок в России и СНГ.
💙 Запрос был непростым: нужен был управленец, умеющий работать с распределенными заводами, запускать новые площадки и автоматизировать процессы. Отдельное жесткое требование — глубокое понимание процессов производства масла (экстракция, прессование, рафинация) и реальный опыт внедрения HA…
Встречаемся через 20 минут на вебинаре, друзья!
↘️
Открытый вебинар, регистрация бесплатна.
11 АВГУСТА (ЧТ) в 17:00 (МСК).
spevents.timepad.ru/event/4121573
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @komandos_n1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Если нужно быстро повысить эффективность компании, куда смотреть первым?
Люди15%
Процессы50%
Руководители12%
Система управления23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 130,606 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Soft Skill | Навыки @iAmbitious · 126,275 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В работе” (@komandos_n1), 15,275 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/komandos_n1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.