Channel
@personalbrand_journey
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
710subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001461691428 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @personalbrand_journey |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/personalbrand_journey |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 710 | -5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 715 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 716 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 720 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:39 | 723 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 728 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 728 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 5 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
90 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 43.3% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 17.8% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.33% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Чтобы стать #1 в чем-то, нужно найти смелость отсекать все лишнее И отказывать клиентам вне выбранной ЦА 👀 Гребенюк в этом видео собрал в единую модель все то, что мы знаем по кусочкам, но почему-то игнорируем. Поняла, что и мне пора пересобрать свою стратегию, чтобы иметь стабильный и прогнозируемый рост. Суть проста: где фокус - там результат. На этапе малого бизнеса ресурсы в виде денег, времени, энергии и ком…
👍2🔥2
В классическом позиционировании мы стараемся сразу снять все вопросы. Хотя именно вопросы и создают интерес 🧐 Последнее время архетип Творца не дает мне спокойно жить. Стратегии по стандарту? - скучно. Каждый новый проект и клиент - это отдельная история, которая пишется с нуля. Рамки и методология, конечно есть, но каждый раз на выходе новый продукт. Сегодня в сторис у подруги наткнулась на свой любимый жанр «рас…
❤4👏1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4👍3
Будет много пользы 👍
Мы часто говорим о бренде работодателя, но забываем, что первое впечатление о компании складывается через людей. Руководители, эксперты и сотрудники становятся её лицом — в социальных сетях, на конференциях, в комментариях, публикациях и даже в поисковой выдаче. Личный бренд сегодня вышел за рамки карьеры отдельного человека. Это инструмент, который помогает компании выстраивать доверие, усиливать HR-бренд и формиро…
🔥6❤3
Почему я делаю бесплатные консультации и для кого? Ну во-первых, я искренне верю в мантру what you give you get back. Причем сначала ты отдаешь, а потом получаешь. Не наоборот. Как это работает? Я не продаю свои услуги на консультациях. Я просто отдаю знания, опыт, внимание и время. В течение недели (а иногда нескольких часов) мне это возвращается в виде запроса на мои услуги - необязательно от человека с консул…
❤10🔥9👍2👏1🤩1
Речь про это
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Проект с ЭГИС, где я была автором, тренером программы для амбассадоров бренда работодателя и коммьюнити-менеджером на этапе запуска, получил высокую оценку отраслевой премии ❤️🔥 Подробнее о проекте тут . Если хотите превратить своих сотрудников в своих адвокатов и контент-команду, приходите - обсудим @Aristova_Ana
🔥6❤4🎉1
Решение по откликам принято 🙌🏻 Запишу на днях кружок
👍3
Зачем тебе личный бренд? Друзья, я появляюсь редко, но с хорошими новостями 😅 Возьму 1-2 человек на бесплатную сессию 90 минут из комментариев под этим постом. Задача - рассказать, зачем вам личный бренд. Чей комментарий отзовется, с тем/той и встретимся 🤍 Подсказка: я люблю истории со смыслом и не люблю «хочу больше 💰» Итоги 31 мая озвучу 🤍
🔥5
Личный бренд - за одну сессию? И да, и нет. Я не верю в то, что на одной консультации можно решить запрос на личный бренд с нуля. Но если, клиент может четко сформулировать цель и кто целевая аудитория, то возможно. Сессия на 90 минут и у нас готово позиционирование, набор инструментов и дорожная карта на 4-6 месяцев, которая приближает к цели. Для тех, кто хочет быстро и дешевле, чем стратегия, попробовать можн…
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @personalbrand_journey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Личный бренд | Аня, с чего начнём?👀” (@personalbrand_journey), 710 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/personalbrand_journey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.