International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net -734. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 97,826–98,780 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 02:36
97,936
-223
19 Sept 2026, 06:16
98,159
-39
16 Sept 2026, 23:01
98,198
+13
14 Sept 2026, 22:39
98,185
-32
13 Sept 2026, 09:57
98,217
-17
11 Sept 2026, 16:39
98,234
-65
9 Sept 2026, 06:17
98,299
-57
6 Sept 2026, 01:57
98,356
+31
4 Sept 2026, 00:18
98,325
-15
2 Sept 2026, 15:26
98,340
-7
1 Sept 2026, 17:58
98,347
-10
31 Aug 2026, 19:26
98,357
-13
30 Aug 2026, 21:45
98,370
-15
29 Aug 2026, 20:16
98,385
-26
28 Aug 2026, 19:55
98,411
-27
27 Aug 2026, 21:23
98,438
-3
26 Aug 2026, 21:02
98,441
-12
26 Aug 2026, 00:22
98,453
-8
25 Aug 2026, 01:14
98,461
-27
23 Aug 2026, 16:37
98,488
first reading
Engagement
1,495 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.31%
avg views ÷ 97,936 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,250
797 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
797
of 1,495 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 788 of 797 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
1,495 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
2,586,820
Reactions total
70,147
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 11:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈44,500
Videos
≈46,900
Links
≈68,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
14h 12m
Average length
1m 39s
Measured directly from 519 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
88,178 reactions across 988 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
17,405
19.7%
🔥
11,514
13.1%
🤣
11,146
12.6%
🤮
7,054
8.00%
🤬
6,873
7.79%
😁
6,308
7.15%
🙏
5,412
6.14%
💊
4,021
4.56%
💯
3,368
3.82%
❤
3,337
3.78%
🤔
2,496
2.83%
🤷♀
2,466
2.80%
😱
1,684
1.91%
👏
1,594
1.81%
🎉
752
0.853%
😨
367
0.416%
🤪
345
0.391%
🍾
332
0.377%
👎
286
0.324%
🙉
286
0.324%
14 further kinds
1,132
1.28%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 991 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88,178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 22 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kolxozdelodobrovolnoeRUS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 22 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇩🇪🇷🇺«Русский след» снова в топе: в Мюнхене предотвращён поджог рядом с офисами оборонных компаний.
Немецкие силовики нашли «русский след» — на этот раз в Мюнхене. В ночь на 3 сентября на стройплощадку рядом с офисами Rohde & Schwarz и Helsing метнули зажигательные устройства из автомобиля. Возгорание оперативно ликвидировали, серьёзных повреждений и пострадавших нет.
➖ Полиция задержала двух граждан Болгарии — мужч…
❗️ВС РФ уничтожили склад крупнейшего производителя мороженого «Рудь» в Житомире
«Рудь» — крупнейший производитель мороженого в Украине, его доля на рынке составляет около 30%. Компания также является крупнейшим украинским экспортёром — её товар продаётся более чем в 36 странах.
На складе хранилась готовая продукция, а также погрузочная техника и другое имущество. Площадь разрушений — 4350 кв. м.
Колхоз дело добров…
Удар ВС РФ: поражены центры связи и логистики ВСУ
Сегодня ночью ВС РФ продолжили наносить удары беспилотниками по портовой и транспортной инфраструктуре, логистическим и коммуникационным центрам в интересах ВСУ, сообщили в Минобороны.
В Киеве поражен центр обработки данных «Космонова», обеспечивавший мобильный интернет и поддержку Starlink для ВСУ.
В Одесской области уничтожены портовый пункт в Вилково, мост в Ма…
Сборная России по боксу выиграла медальный зачет чемпионата Европы
На счету наших ребят 15 медалей: семь золотых, пять серебряных и три бронзовые награды.
Последнее золото принес Давид Суров — он победил англичанина Дамара Томаса (категория свыше 90 кг).
🇮🇷 Презедент Ирана Пезешкиан в ООН заявил: «Израиль сам обладает атомной бомбой, но его никогда не проверяли, в то время как Иран подвергается проверкам. Израиль убивает людей, но санкции вводятся против Ирана. Иран не просит особых привилегий, он хочет равных прав».
Колхоз дело добровольное На МАХ 📬 ✍️
WP: разведка США подозревает Саудовскую Аравию в стремлении к ядерному оружию
The Washington Post со ссылкой на источники в администрации сообщает, что разведка США считает: Саудовская Аравия может стремиться получить ядерное оружие. Такая оценка содержится в секретных документах, переданных Конгрессу. Публикация усилила беспокойство части законодателей по поводу заключённого Трампом соглашения о поддержке мирной яд…
«Это мой любимый тип». Узбек непристойно домогался до школьницы
45-летний гражданин Узбекистана, приехавший подзаработать в Японию, не смог сдержать свои инстинкты. Дилшод Муминов, работавший курьером по доставке еды, привез заказ. Дверь ему открыла 10-летняя школьница.
По информации полиции Токио, мужчина вместо того, что просто отдать еду, полез обниматься, поцеловал малышку в лицо и совершил «непристойные действ…
Киев полностью заморозил возврат НДС бизнесу из-за пустой казны
Украинская экономика официально перешла в режим банкрота. Киев полностью остановил возмещение НДС экспортерам и заморозил оплаты по государственным контрактам. Источники в бизнес-среде констатируют, что финансовые операции через госказначейство полностью заблокированы — денег в бюджете просто нет.
Финансирование урезано по всем статьям, кроме армии и з…
Когда математика бессильна Почему раскулаченный Фибоначчи боится нашего триколора
👍58💯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,495 posts we hold for @kolxozdelodobrovolnoeRUS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@kolxozdelodobrovolnoeRUS named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rt_russian named in 4 posts, 26 August 2026 – 19 September 2026
@sputniklive named in 1 post, 25 September 2026 – 25 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Владимир Горбовский @gorbovskiyfsb · 24,926 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
ВЕЖЛИВЫЕ💥 ЛЮДИ 🇷🇺РОССИИ🇷🇺 @Tama_tv_Life · 27,838 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
КТО ПО ЖИЗНИ @KPZYoyTube · 68,659 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 August 2026
Naran_official @naran_official · 23,201 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
Петя Первый @Petya_perviy · 244,807 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Алексей Коваленко @aleksejkovalenkooriginal · 28,102 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 9 September 2026
Николай Дульский. Официальный канал НКО «Формат 45» @DulskiyN · 27,745 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
Русский Дом 🇷🇺 @russkiy_dommm · 32,743 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
КРЕАТИВНЫЙ ДИРЕКТОР @kredir · 28,093 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 September 2026
КОМИКАДZЕ @maxkomikadze · 50,080 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
Романов Владимир | Северный поток 3 @potokseverniy · 28,270 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
igorekfeed @igorekfeed · 21,481 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 September 2026
Южный дозор @Ne_Donskoy · 42,018 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
ТриДевятое Царство 👑 @Carstvo_39 · 36,830 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
КОЛОБОК ИЗ ОДЕССЫ @kolobok_odesa · 101,250 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
БУДДА ГРИШНА НОВОСТИ @buddagrishna · 46,338 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
Дядя Слава @slavaded1337 · 471,080 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Zuben_co Новости @zuben_co · 121,510 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Объективный Евген @Truevgen · 42,322 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026
Антон Шабашов @antohakrasava · 37,646 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
WALK&TALK @walkandtalke · 57,747 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
РАГУЛЯКУ НА ГЫЛЯКУ ™ @ragulaku · 59,178 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Колхоз дело добровольное Руслан” (@kolxozdelodobrovolnoeRUS), 97,936 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kolxozdelodobrovolnoeRUS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.