Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КТО ПО ЖИЗНИ

Channel

КТО ПО ЖИЗНИ

@KPZYoyTube

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

68,997subscribers

+196 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001432170695
TypeChannel
Username@KPZYoyTube
Description@Reutov_KPZ - по вопросам рекламы, предложениям и сливам. INSTAGRAM 👉 https://www.instagram.com/reutov_wit?igsh=eGtjZWkyaXR5cDl0&utm_source=qr Стримы тут Kick 👉 https://kick.com/kto-po-zhizni-333
Created22 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/KPZYoyTube

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@KPZYoyTube/13884 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC@epoxa_derzkix/93696 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC1.0025 hours
@KPZYoyTube/13897 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC@epoxa_derzkix/93796 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC1.0024 hours
@KPZYoyTube/13899 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC@epoxa_derzkix/93806 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC1.0023 hours
@KPZYoyTube/13904 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC@epoxa_derzkix/93816 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC1.0011 minutes
@KPZYoyTube/13913 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC@epoxa_derzkix/93867 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC1.0028 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@epoxa_derzkix5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0023 hoursthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @KPZYoyTube — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

68,43468,99768,715.56 August 2026 — 68,801 subscribers7 August 2026 — 68,798 subscribers8 August 2026 — 68,813 subscribers9 August 2026 — 68,793 subscribers10 August 2026 — 68,790 subscribers11 August 2026 — 68,789 subscribers12 August 2026 — 68,802 subscribers13 August 2026 — 68,797 subscribers14 August 2026 — 68,788 subscribers15 August 2026 — 68,794 subscribers17 August 2026 — 68,769 subscribers18 August 2026 — 68,730 subscribers19 August 2026 — 68,735 subscribers20 August 2026 — 68,720 subscribers21 August 2026 — 68,672 subscribers23 August 2026 — 68,655 subscribers24 August 2026 — 68,608 subscribers25 August 2026 — 68,561 subscribers26 August 2026 — 68,540 subscribers27 August 2026 — 68,524 subscribers28 August 2026 — 68,502 subscribers29 August 2026 — 68,486 subscribers30 August 2026 — 68,457 subscribers31 August 2026 — 68,454 subscribers1 September 2026 — 68,444 subscribers3 September 2026 — 68,434 subscribers4 September 2026 — 68,439 subscribers7 September 2026 — 68,511 subscribers10 September 2026 — 68,636 subscribers12 September 2026 — 68,631 subscribers14 September 2026 — 68,630 subscribers15 September 2026 — 68,658 subscribers17 September 2026 — 68,659 subscribers28 September 2026 — 68,997 subscribers6 August 202628 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 53 days, net +196. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68,350–69,081 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 18:3868,997+338
17 Sept 2026, 21:2168,659+1
15 Sept 2026, 21:5568,658+28
14 Sept 2026, 06:3968,630-1
12 Sept 2026, 16:5568,631-5
10 Sept 2026, 19:0068,636+125
7 Sept 2026, 15:3768,511+72
4 Sept 2026, 17:1568,439+5
3 Sept 2026, 02:5768,434-10
1 Sept 2026, 23:0868,444-10
31 Aug 2026, 20:2868,454-3
30 Aug 2026, 22:4668,457-29
29 Aug 2026, 19:4768,486-16
28 Aug 2026, 17:0268,502-22
27 Aug 2026, 14:2568,524-16
26 Aug 2026, 15:3568,540-21
25 Aug 2026, 18:5368,561-47
24 Aug 2026, 20:2568,608-47
23 Aug 2026, 06:2468,655-17
21 Aug 2026, 17:0868,672first reading

Engagement

430 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 151 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 68,997 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,400
260 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
260
of 430 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held430 (3 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total3,471,810
Reactions total52,208
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 06:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,600
Videos
≈4,830
Links
≈1,260

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 45m
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 111 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

90,255 reactions across 429 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣40,10444.4%
👍19,48721.6%
🔥9,44110.5%
😁6,0206.67%
❤5,3645.94%
😡4,6925.20%
😱2,8253.13%
🙏1,6791.86%
😢6430.712%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 429 of the 430 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90,255 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 430 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
932
across the posts below
Posts paid on
103
of 429 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
103
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KPZYoyTube. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 430 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 04:53 UTC≈3,920 views239 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

С Близкими😁

🤣224😁13🔥2

30 Sept 2026, 03:16 UTC≈6,150 views83 reactions1 Starread 30 September 2026
Photo

А что за бинт у Бородина сзади? Кто то объяснил ему, что Тимати не покупал никакую машину?🤣

😁56🤣23👍3😢1

29 Sept 2026, 23:32 UTC≈7,970 views117 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥56👍26🤣21❤9😢3🙏2

29 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC≈9,760 views78 reactionsread 30 September 2026

В Ютуб тоже выкинул это видео 👉 https://youtube.com/shorts/YdVo4N11nNU?is=1k5a7EgQSfkG2HsD

👍46🤣27😢3🔥2

29 Sept 2026, 17:46 UTC≈10,700 views80 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Ахахха бля вы уже видели этот позор?🤦‍♂️🤣🤣🤣 https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dd4T1LHtrPs/?stkn=MTU1YmZjdDQ0dDFncg==

🤣70❤6😢4

29 Sept 2026, 14:35 UTC≈12,000 views96 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Бедность мужчины — главная причина разводов в России, показал опрос Почти каждый развод (85%) инициируется женщиной, а каждый второй из них происходит из-за нехватки средств у супруга. Главный показатель ресурсов мужчины согласно исследованию — автомобиль. Только 21% россиянок готовы встречаться с мужчиной, у которого нет и не будет авто. При этом 72% женщин хотят мужчину с премиальной машиной. Жду ваши коммента…

😁65❤15😱8🤣4😢3🔥1

28 Sept 2026, 19:06 UTC≈14,400 views168 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

ЗАВТРА ДРОПНУ ВАМ НОВОЕ ВИДЕО ВОТ С ТАКОЙ ОБЛОЖКОЙ. ДУМАЮ ВЫ ПОНЯЛИ О КОМ БУДЕТ РЕЧЬ😈

👍106🤣27😁23❤5🔥3😢2😱2

28 Sept 2026, 17:46 UTC≈14,500 views146 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁80🤣40👍19❤4😢3

27 Sept 2026, 20:15 UTC≈16,000 views285 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍201🔥40🤣27❤11😱3😁2😢1

27 Sept 2026, 18:35 UTC≈15,800 views89 reactionsread 30 September 2026

У кого нет Инсты можете посмотреть в ЮТУБЕ - https://youtube.com/shorts/aPvlPM8K2lc?si=5x3EHSDEL8IT4dE6

👍58❤10🔥9🤣8😢4

27 Sept 2026, 17:57 UTC≈15,500 views75 reactions2 Starsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Новое видео 👉 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdzLNqQNIMI/?stkn=ZHI5ZHFzems0d3py

🔥52🤣17❤5😢1

27 Sept 2026, 15:44 UTC≈15,400 views269 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣221🔥31❤9👍3😢3😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 430 posts we hold for @KPZYoyTube. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@KPZYoyTube edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 September 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Sept 2026, 02:42 UTCAnonymous Poll2,900 voters approx.

Меняем название канала с Epoha Derzkih на Freak house?

  1. ДА67%
  2. НЕТ34%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTCAnonymous Poll4,170 voters approx.

ЗА КОГО БУДЕТЕ ГОЛОСОВАТЬ?

  1. ЕДИНАЯ РОССИЯ24%
  2. КПРФ9%
  3. ЛДПР11%
  4. СПРАВЕДЛИВАЯ РОССИЯ2%
  5. НОВЫЕ ЛЮДИ15%
  6. ЯБЛОКО6%
  7. ПРОТИВ ВСЕХ8%
  8. ЗА ВСЕХ4%
  9. НЕ БУДУ ГОЛОСОВАТЬ24%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 430 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,415,446
#1
АДСКАЯ РУЛЕТКА LIVE (ПАКУЛЬ)
@AdskayaRuletkaLIVE · 30,195
#2
VOBLA • новости
@voina_belgorod_novosti · 1,119,745
#3
РИМ 🕊
@rhymesrim · 294,808
#4
ВЕЖЛИВЫЕ💥 ЛЮДИ 🇷🇺РОССИИ🇷🇺
@Tama_tv_Life · 27,838
#5
Вячеслав Гаранин
@gashikPovar2 · 20,053
#6
Колхоз дело добровольное Руслан
@kolxozdelodobrovolnoeRUS · 97,936
#7
Крупнокалиберный Переполох
@bolshiepushki · 325,501
#8
Говорит ТопаZ 🪖
@Love_Russia_Beauty · 116,030
#9
Бладсикер 2.0
@bIoodsiker · 212,218
#10
ПОЛНЫЙ ЗАНОС TV
@polnoetvludik · 764
#11
ЭПОХА ДЕРЗКИХ
@EPOHA_DERZKIH · 35,963
#12
Дядя Слава
@slavaded1337 · 471,080
#13
ЭПОХА ДЕРЗКИХ
@era_berani_1 · 9,862
#14
Mash
@mash · 3,110,586
#15
MELLSTROY BONUS
@mellstroybonus · 328,434
#16
Прямой Эфир • Новости
@novosti_efir · 3,969,794
#17
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,672,095
#18
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,712,089
#19
Медийка
@mediyca · 726,755
#20
Петя Первый
@Petya_perviy · 250,779
#21
Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны
@rvvoenkor · 1,459,028
#22
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,014,901
#23
Два майора
@dva_majors · 1,167,469
#24
SHOT
@shot_shot · 1,265,657
#25
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,974,402
#26
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,401
#27
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,565,293
#28
СОЛОВЬЁВ
@solovievlive · 1,101,856
#29
EDWARD BIL
@camon_edward · 351,096
#30
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 747,495
#31
ФЕРОМОНИХА😈
@dariaisf · 1,901
#32
Труха⚡️Україна
@truexanewsua · 3,127,466
#33
Kadyrov_95
@rkadyrov_95 · 2,096,508
#34
Кирилл Фёдоров / Война История Оружие
@warhistoryalconafter · 481,589
#35
Белорусский силовик
@belarusian_silovik · 453,479
#36
Апти Алаудинов «АХМАТ»
@AptiAlaudinovAKHMAT · 202,140
#37
Сладков+
@sladkov_plus · 705,173
#38
Zлой Пруф️
@proofzzz · 610,756
#39
Повёрнутые на войне 🇷🇺
@voenacher · 664,441
#40
ТОПОР - Горячие новости
@topor · 1,295,905
#41
WarGonzo
@wargonzo · 745,026
#42
НМШ
@nmshhub · 721,829
#43
Русский меч
@Rrussiansword · 167,989
#44
ТОП ХАТА Нарезки
@topnarezki · 6,229
#45
Alex Parker Returns
@apwagner · 317,873
#46
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,696,520
#47
Батькович
@batka_ru · 85,355
#48
Ловец Человеков: МЕЖДУ МИРОМ И ВОЙНОЙ
@iamhumancatcher · 128,383
#49
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 527,032
#50
Дмитрий Никотин
@dmitrynikotin · 681,176
#51
E1.RU | Новости Екатеринбурга
@e1_news · 430,674
#52
КОМИКАДZЕ
@maxkomikadze · 50,080
#53
vk_logistik
@vk_logistik · 105,221
#54
ZАПИСКИ VЕТЕРАНА 🇷🇺
@notes_veterans · 276,927
#55
Украина.ру
@ukr_2025_ru · 494,459
#56
Минобороны России
@mod_russia · 650,718
#57
🇷🇺 DONTSTOPWAR
@dontstopwar · 249,958
#58
МИГ России
@mig41 · 480,324
#59
Старше Эдды
@vysokygovorit · 491,085
#60
Kotsnews
@sashakots · 473,335
#61
Русская Община ZOV
@obshina_ru · 593,956
#62
SkyLine(видеоролики)
@Gang_Horizon · 7,297
#63
Осташко! Важное
@ostashkonews · 425,633
#64
СОЛДАТ УДАЧИ
@Soldieroffortune777 · 124,363
#65
ЛИТВИН
@litvintm · 1,569,936
#66
Hardcore Fighting
@hardcore_fightingtg · 251,304
#67
ОПГ Лит Энерджи ⚽️
@fclit_official · 95,815
#68

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

КРЕАТИВНЫЙ ДИРЕКТОР
@kredir · 28,023
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 September 2026
ШТРЭБУХ
@Shtrebuh · 32,574
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 10 September 2026
СУНДУК
@sunduk91 · 30,261
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 September 2026
vk_logistik
@vk_logistik · 105,221
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 24 August 2026
MrRissso
@mrrissso63 · 21,620
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 September 2026
igorekfeed
@igorekfeed · 21,218
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 September 2026
ВИКТОРОВИЧ🥸
@batya_smeh_prikol · 71,878
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 25 September 2026
АлСми
@i_alsmi · 51,673
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 15 September 2026
ВЕЖЛИВЫЕ💥 ЛЮДИ 🇷🇺РОССИИ🇷🇺
@Tama_tv_Life · 27,838
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
Николай Дульский. Официальный канал НКО «Формат 45»
@DulskiyN · 27,745
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
Новости Шеремета 9½
@TauNewsEkb · 33,882
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КТО ПО ЖИЗНИ” (@KPZYoyTube), 68,997 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KPZYoyTube.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.