Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Форум SOLD OUT

Channel

Форум SOLD OUT

@markevent

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,063subscribers

-87 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001321702518
TypeChannel
Username@markevent
Created31 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/markevent

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 7 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@iventologia/103923 Jun 2026, 11:22 UTC@markevent/2011 · this entry23 Jun 2026, 12:23 UTC1.0061 minutes
@iventologia/104027 Jun 2026, 09:31 UTC@markevent/2014 · this entry27 Jun 2026, 10:16 UTC1.0045 minutes
@iventologia/10411 Jul 2026, 09:18 UTC@markevent/2016 · this entry1 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC1.0067 minutes
@iventologia/10438 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC@markevent/2019 · this entry8 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC1.0013 minutes
@iventologia/104410 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC@markevent/2021 · this entry10 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC1.0060 minutes
@iventologia/104612 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC@markevent/2022 · this entry12 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC1.0040 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@iventologia7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0045 minutes@iventologia (6–1)
@targetingschool5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0070 minutes@targetingschool (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 11 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 15 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 7, the earliest publisher we hold is @whiteedtechwork. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 6 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,0636,1506,106.56 August 2026 — 6,150 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,149 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,138 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,121 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,110 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,108 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,101 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,091 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,086 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,082 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,076 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,077 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,076 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,063 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,050–6,163 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 22:016,063-13
14 Sept 2026, 03:176,076-1
10 Sept 2026, 11:016,077+1
4 Sept 2026, 23:176,076-6
1 Sept 2026, 15:366,082-4
29 Aug 2026, 20:576,086-5
26 Aug 2026, 11:126,091-10
23 Aug 2026, 17:036,101-7
19 Aug 2026, 22:346,108-2
16 Aug 2026, 15:386,110-11
13 Aug 2026, 07:366,121-17
10 Aug 2026, 02:256,138-11
7 Aug 2026, 04:416,149-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:346,150first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 57s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

163 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7244.2%
🔥5131.3%
👍2716.6%
👏63.68%
🎉53.07%
🤩21.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC298 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Запуск любого проекта похож на день мероприятия: всё уже готово, проверено и несколько раз перепроверено, но до последней минуты вы всё равно прислушиваетесь к каждому звуку и ждёте первых гостей. На связи Наталия Франкель, и сегодня я хочу поделиться своей большой радостью. В полночь мы закрыли вход в предзапуск проекта для ивент-менеджеров, о котором я рассказывала последнее время и которого мы с командой так ждал…

❤1

9 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC328 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как продвигать события, собирать аудиторию, разобравшись с вопросами маркетинга Вы уже слышали про SOLD OUT, а может быть, даже участвовали. В октябре команда, которая организовала это событие, проводит «Суровый Питерский форум». А 12 августа в 17:00 пройдёт открытая онлайн‑презентация, где вы узнаете, почему Суровый пригодится не только маркетологам. Программа на сайте — это хорошо. Но на эфире покажем то, чего та…

❤3🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC395 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Можно быть сильным экспертом и совершенно не уметь рассказывать о своей работе. Как превратить знания в выступление, которое действительно поймёт аудитория? В новом интервью Илья Боронников — руководитель продюсерского центра MedTech-платформы МедРокет, программный продюсер конференции «Дни МедРокет», а также коуч по публичным выступлениям — рассказывает, как готовят к сцене экспертов из медицинской сферы. Почему п…

❤4👍3🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC509 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

На связи Наталия Франкель, и сегодня я хочу поговорить о том, что человеку нужен человек Потому что, когда приходится принимать сложные решения, рядом должны находиться те, кто поймет. Даже когда все зависит от вас, и особенно когда все зависит от вас. И это замечательно, когда такие люди находятся у вас дома, поддерживают после работы, но часто так бывает, что они не понимают. Они хотят понять, очень хотят поддер…

🔥4❤2

31 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC737 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Перепутать гимны, закрыть VIP-выход баннером и лишиться всех наград за четыре минуты до церемонии. Что ещё может пойти не так на официальном мероприятии? В новом интервью Диана Малышева — режиссёр более тысячи событий и директор «Дирекции фестивальных и культурно-массовых мероприятий Челябинской области» — рассказывает о работе с VIP-гостями и протокольной частью. Почему даже самое эффектное шоу может быть полность…

❤3🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC639 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Мы, как никто знаем, сколько звёзд должно сойтись, чтобы найти то самое оптимальное место для ивента. Для своих крупных форумов SOLD OUT и «Суровый Питерский форум» мы используем Cosmos Прибалтийская Отель. А для «Белой конфы» традиционно берём более уютную и компактную площадку. Если вы ещё не успели побывать в AIRPORTCITY PLAZA Санкт-Петербург, приготовили для вас небольшой обзор. Что есть в этой площадке, что при…

🔥4❤3👍1

28 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC722 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Делимся полезным подкастом про онлайн в ивентах На многих мероприятиях онлайн до сих пор существует по принципу «ну, все делают, надо и нам снимать». Если задумывались, как это можно превратить в отдельную статью дохода, посмотрите подскаст, который мы подготовили. Там организатор впервые открыто разбирает экономику онлайна на своих мероприятиях — с цифрами и примерами. Алексей Никушин (Матемаркетинг, AHA) раскла…

👍2

24 Jul 2026, 12:20 UTC812 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Почему на детских мероприятиях иногда сложнее работать не с детьми, а с... родителями? В новом интервью эксперт по детскому фитнесу, педагог и организатор детских мероприятий Анастасия Шуляк рассказывает, как сделать праздник, после которого счастливы все: дети получают яркие эмоции, родители хотят вернуться снова, а организаторы достигают своих бизнес-целей. 🎈 О чём поговорили — Правда ли, что родители готовы вкла…

❤5🔥5🤩2

17 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC749 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Можно ли сделать музей смерти местом, после которого хочется... жить? В новом интервью Павел Бабкин — креативный директор Музея мировой погребальной культуры и организатор форума «Некрополь» — рассказывает, как устроена одна из самых закрытых индустрий, почему тема смерти перестаёт быть табу и зачем тысячи людей добровольно приезжают в музей, расположенный на территории действующего крематория. ⚱️ О чём поговорили:…

👍3❤1

12 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC747 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Уже 13 июля проведём бесплатный эфир «Локальный маркетинг в России 2026: почему большинство компаний до сих пор продвигается так, будто на дворе 2019 год» Вы ещё успеваете записаться: 🔜 бот в Максе 🔜 бот в Телеграм Почему важно разобрать эту тему Рейтинг компании в картах давно перестал быть просто красивой цифрой. Теперь это фактор ранжирования: от него зависит, покажет ли платформа вашу карточку клиенту. Яндекс…

❤4

10 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC715 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Локальный маркетинг в России 2026: почему большинство компаний до сих пор продвигается так, будто на дворе 2019 год По этой теме мы проведём бесплатный эфир от «Сурового клуба», потому что многие компании до сих пор льют трафик на сайт, думая, что это единственный способ получать лиды. В 2019 году такая схема действительно работала хорошо, но сейчас ситуация изменилась. Смотрите на цифры: — Яндекс Картами пользуют…

8 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC705 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Клоунада — это детские шарики и красный нос? Нет, одно из самых сложных современных искусств! В новом интервью генеральный продюсер «Карандаш-фест» Андрей Солдаткин рассказывает, как небольшой город на Волге стал местом рождения крупнейшего фестиваля клоунады, почему сегодня этот жанр переживает новое рождение и чем настоящий клоун принципиально отличается от стендап-комика. 🎭 О чём поговорили: — Почему фестиваль …

❤6🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @markevent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Демидов сейчас
@justdemidovit · 43,854
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
N:OW
@nowagency · 21,745
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Форум SOLD OUT” (@markevent), 6,063 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/markevent.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.