Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Павел Недостоев / дилер впечатлений

Channel

Павел Недостоев / дилер впечатлений

@pavelnedostoev

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,273subscribers

+74 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001601382559
TypeChannel
Username@pavelnedostoev
DescriptionВизуальные тренды которые вдохновляет арт-директоров/трендсеттеров, инсайты креативных индустрий и немного личного Основатель: PANTERRA / DEPARTÁMENT / EVENT MBA заявление о регистр. https://clck.ru/3GJV6d @tonkingram по рекламе
Created11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pavelnedostoev

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

30,11430,75130,432.56 August 2026 — 30,199 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,259 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,310 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,224 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,236 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,206 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,233 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,255 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,265 subscribers16 August 2026 — 30,153 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,197 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,305 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,751 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,694 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30,608 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,573 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,435 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,369 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,309 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,301 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,396 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,320 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,317 subscribers31 August 2026 — 30,281 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,208 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,201 subscribers3 September 2026 — 30,289 subscribers5 September 2026 — 30,381 subscribers8 September 2026 — 30,354 subscribers11 September 2026 — 30,248 subscribers13 September 2026 — 30,154 subscribers14 September 2026 — 30,145 subscribers16 September 2026 — 30,114 subscribers19 September 2026 — 30,288 subscribers25 September 2026 — 30,273 subscribers30,2736 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net +74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,018–30,847 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 21:2230,273-15
19 Sept 2026, 03:1930,288+174
16 Sept 2026, 14:5830,114-31
14 Sept 2026, 16:3730,145-9
13 Sept 2026, 02:1530,154-94
11 Sept 2026, 01:0130,248-106
8 Sept 2026, 05:1530,354-27
5 Sept 2026, 02:5930,381+92
3 Sept 2026, 09:0830,289+88
2 Sept 2026, 03:5430,201-7
1 Sept 2026, 02:4730,208-73
31 Aug 2026, 00:1730,281-36
30 Aug 2026, 03:1330,317-3
29 Aug 2026, 00:1730,320-76
28 Aug 2026, 01:1230,396+95
27 Aug 2026, 03:4530,301-8
26 Aug 2026, 05:2630,309-60
25 Aug 2026, 07:4830,369-66
24 Aug 2026, 11:1830,435-138
22 Aug 2026, 17:5530,573first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.3%
avg views ÷ 30,273 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,050
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held35 (22 July 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total133,930
Reactions total6,205
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Oct 2026, 07:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,690
Videos
≈516
Links
≈438

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 37s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10,472 reactions across 35 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
⚡10,472100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,472 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
78
across the posts below
Posts paid on
31
of 35 we hold a reading for · 89%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pavelnedostoev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2026, 22:26 UTC≈3,460 views126 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Субботин Конфа 2026 Третья Конфа пройдет 25 ноября в AG Loft. Запускаю продажу билетов и жду вас. Субботин Конфа – это ежегодное событие, где я собираю главных людей из фестивальной индустрии – организаторов, людей из брендов, топов из агентств и площадок. См. список гостей Конфы 2025. Цель Конфы – создать место для коммуникации: чтобы качественные фестивали находили спонсоров, а спонсоры делали интересные интегра…

⚡126

1 Oct 2026, 21:34 UTC≈3,700 views449 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Японские обложки Маяковского. Какой топ. Подсмотрел у журнала Puls.

⚡449

1 Oct 2026, 14:55 UTC≈5,220 views363 reactions6 Starsread 2 October 2026
Photo

🦴Друзья, я состою в подпольном сообществе «креативный директор», некоторые знают его как «клюб» В нем участвуют топы - владельцы ведущих креативных, ивент и диджитал агентств, арт директора, креаторы из Канн, селебрити, миллионеры визионеры и филантропы. Сейчас 180 игроков за столом. 150+ бизнесов 11 лет мы в деле Собственные инициативы по прозрачности тендеров, этике, отношениям агентств и клиентов, отраслевым р…

⚡363

29 Sept 2026, 21:57 UTC≈7,770 views328 reactions1 Starread 2 October 2026
Photo

TERMINAL 004 San-Diego 2026 PANTERRA на фестивале NITEHARTS. Наша команда представит сразу две инсталляции - одна из них - TERMINAL 004, а о второй мы расскажем немного позже. TERMINAL это пространственный интерфейс постчеловеческой эпохи, в котором технологии и гуманистическое мышление соединяются в единую систему опыта. Работа формирует среду сопряжения, где человеческое присутствие вступает в прямой контакт с т…

⚡328

27 Sept 2026, 18:13 UTC≈8,150 views385 reactions1 Starread 1 October 2026
Video

Осень лучшее время для учебы, кому-то возможно пора вылезти из пещеры Платона что бы посмотреть на мир по новому. Дерзайте, ниже информация для ищущего Как делать ивенты, которыми хочется гордиться? Хочется уйти от скучной рутины в живые проекты, делать события, которые вызывают мурашки, стоять за кулисами и с гордостью понимать: «Это сделал я». Чтобы творческие амбиции стали профессией, а масштабные идеи не разб…

⚡385

23 Sept 2026, 21:54 UTC≈6,000 views415 reactions1 Starread 1 October 2026
Photo

Bentley дропнули новый джип заставив меня написать вам из джунглей ✨🌴🦜

⚡415

23 Sept 2026, 02:08 UTC≈8,300 views420 reactions2 Starsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

⚡420

22 Sept 2026, 14:36 UTC≈8,320 views368 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

⚡368

20 Sept 2026, 21:39 UTC≈6,350 views268 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

⚡268

20 Sept 2026, 21:39 UTC≈6,280 views234 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

Вчера полез на сайт росстата посмотреть на отчет за полугодие по экономике и глянуть что там с креативными индустриями, а тут был на неделе спор по обьему и динамике, хотел с точкой зрения официальной познакомься. Но ничего там не нашел толкового, но знаю где еще спросить. Зато нашел клевый отчет за 2025 год хотя там данные 23-24 в основном. Интересно посмотреть там и демография и экономика, экспорты цены и перечисл…

⚡234

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @pavelnedostoev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Event ru – все про ивенты и эвенты
@TheBestOfEventRu · 19,257
#1
BALAGAN
@balaganagency · 8,675
#2
multimedia world
@multimedia_world · 7,897
#3
N:OW
@nowagency · 21,745
#4
Демидов сейчас
@justdemidovit · 43,854
#5
ИВЕНТ ИДЕИ
@eventideasaroundtheworld · 10,719
#6
Телеграмма от Максима Юрина
@yumaks · 42,740
#7
Событийный маркетинг
@Dmitrieva_eventmarketing · 3,930
#8
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,676
#9
Событийная индустрия
@worldofevent · 3,726
#10
Брендвотчинг
@brandwatching · 15,150
#11
Субботин про спонсорство
@yurysubbotinchannel · 16,094
#12
SILA SVETA kitchen
@silasveta_kitchen · 9,827
#13
Light with Us
@lightwithus · 3,096
#14
EVENT MBA HR I Вакансии & резюме
@eventmbaHR · 15,874
#15
EVENT MBA | media
@Eventmbamedia · 14,367
#16
Спасибо, Оля!
@olya_valitova · 3,843
#17
• МОТЫЛЁК | MOTYLYOK •
@motylyokchannel · 2,668
#18
Степанов 👽 Евангелист мультимедиа
@devdir_newmedia · 2,595
#19
Eventually
@eventually_management · 5,420
#20
Light Your Mind • LYM
@lympro · 7,428
#21
Кристобаль Хунта
@cristobalhunta · 4,663
#22
GLOBAL EVENT FORUM
@GLOBALEVENTFEST · 5,789
#23
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 301,646
#24
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,974,402
#25
Синявский считает…
@Sinbrain · 18,364
#26
Точки над ИИ
@TochkiNadAI · 17,860
#27
dreamlaser
@dreamlaser · 4,861
#28
INTERVALS FESTIVAL
@intervalsfest · 16,257
#29
КОНЦЕПТУАРИУМ3000
@illuminarium3000 · 1,928
#30
театр гвоздей
@teatr_gvozdey · 1,653
#31
TIMASHCHUK Pro креативные технологии
@timashchukEA · 5,178
#32
Хабиби Бизнес Дубай
@habibibusinessdubai · 8,117
#33
EPigraph
@EPigraphMag · 6,155
#34
REDDAY
@reddayevent · 7,017
#35
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 855,067
#36
Гиперболоид Дениса Чучко
@d_chuchko · 1,300
#37
Feerique
@feerique_events · 7,866
#38
VOIC: о технологиях и людях
@voictech · 5,778
#39
ALISA DAVYDOVA
@alisadavydovaa · 1,270
#40
ЖП
@conversationpiece · 856
#41
Журнал «РежМасс»
@rejmass · 2,325
#42
JORBENDRIVE
@jorbendrive · 4,441
#43
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,178,521
#44
Виталий Крылов - Команда А
@howtomake10x · 17,299
#45
Русский маркетинг
@smmrus · 125,271
#46
Sostav
@sostav · 56,078
#47
ÖMANKÖ
@omanko · 113,987
#48
ХУЦПА <-> Женя Давыдов
@hutzp · 45,113
#49
СысоевFM
@sysoevfm · 374,345
#50
radugadesign
@radugadesign · 2,321
#51
Жесткое направление
@HardDirection · 1,434
#52
ИВЕНТ-БАТЯ
@lutenkopro · 2,574
#53
Продюсер Kartoz
@kartozz · 123,525
#54
Media Art Crisis Guide
@MediaArtCrisis · 406
#55
Креатив со звездочкой
@creative · 134,107
#56
Реальный Event⚡️LIVE
@event_live_ru · 7,767
#57
МЕЛ
@melcreative · 4,100
#58
Андрей Шешенин | Ивент Университет
@eventtalk · 2,161
#59
SETTERS Media
@setters · 84,107
#60
НУР • NUR
@nurfestival · 8,920
#61
bema!festival
@bemafestival · 1,833
#62
ХОТ ДИДЖИТАЛ от Влада Ситникова
@HotDigital · 23,395
#63
Лисейчева, твой выход
@mandarinfoxnews · 2,877
#64
Клиент
@yourtypicalclient · 47,605
#65
Poka spit Dali 👁
@pokaspitdali · 1,552
#66
Павел Александров
@alekspavel_psy · 3,672
#67
Generative Gallery
@generativegallery · 4,184
#68
ГРИС: все о режиссуре событий и креативе
@GRIS_info · 1,312
#69
AI меняет культуру | Trabun
@danieltrbn · 13,210
#70
ПМТ — Инновации в движении
@pmt_multimedia · 21,881
#71
STAY TYUNED
@staytyuned · 2,226
#72
kyrillic
@kyrillic · 60,982
#73
Ивент как бизнес | Андрей Шешенин
@eventasbusiness · 3,043
#74
REDKEDS
@REDKEDSAGENCY · 4,971
#75
Стратегические сессии с [able]
@able_plus · 1,543
#76
Важно ! Не срочно
@vazhnonesrochno · 10,130
#77
Партнерская сессия®️
@partnership_expert · 14,779
#78
Записки AI предпринимателя | Дима Захаров
@dimaprobiznes · 2,734 (as read 7 September 2026)
#79
У вас будет продюсер
@zhiganovalex · 1,183
#80
MOYSET
@moyset_chanel · 2,357
#81
Signal Live
@signal_live · 27,509
#82
Усталый ивентор
@tired_organizer · 3,240
#83
MAX AGENCY. О шоу и техническом продакшне событий
@mnmprod · 2,180
#84
Нишевый фест G8 | 11 сентября
@ggggggggfest · 4,107
#85
Автожурнал ВЕТЕРОК
@veterokauto · 2,678
#86
media.tribe
@mediatribeart · 783
#87
Дудь
@yurydud · 862,341
#88
ФАВН
@ffavn · 383
#89
BIZAR — маркетплейс современного искусства
@bizar_market · 3,574
#90
Конгресс-Центр ЦМТ
@wtc_congress · 5,295
#91
Сергей Минаев
@minaevlife · 318,588
#92
The Blueprint
@theblueprintru · 96,272
#93
Ольга Маркина: сознание и благополучие
@MarkinaPro · 8,643
#94
Режиссёрский ХОД
@stage_is_yours · 692
#95
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,409
#96

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

N:OW
@nowagency · 21,745
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 September 2026
Демидов сейчас
@justdemidovit · 43,854
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
основы основ ⚡️
@okkk_club · 30,717
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 6 September 2026
Телеграмма от Максима Юрина
@yumaks · 42,740
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 29 August 2026
ПМТ — Инновации в движении
@pmt_multimedia · 21,881
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Павел Недостоев / дилер впечатлений” (@pavelnedostoev), 30,273 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pavelnedostoev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.