Live stream scheduled for Aug 11 at 13:00

Channel
Финансы в гармонии|Анна Русакова
@annushka_just
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
597subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001300351288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @annushka_just |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/annushka_just |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 597 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 599 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 599 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 18.9%
- avg views ÷ 597 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 113
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.11%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (20 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,807 |
| Reactions total | 49 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
49 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 36.7% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 34.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 12.2% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 12.2% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 4.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Друзья, спасибо за ваше голосование! Мы готовили второй эфир с Денисом и спрашивали, какую тему по вторичке разобрать первой. И голоса распределились неожиданно: больше всего откликов набрала тема, которую я, признаться, и сама считаю самой важной. «Как оценить инвестиционный потенциал квартиры на вторичке». Почему это отозвалось? Мне кажется, потому что все мы покупаем квартиру «для жизни», но на самом деле — это…
👌2
Вчера вернулась из отпуска Поездка к маме — это всегда маленькое путешествие в моё детство. Она, как всегда, стремится влиять на внуков, выдаёт свои паттерны поведения. И мне было по-настоящему сложно. Но в этот раз я собралась с духом и сделала то, на что раньше не решалась. Я сказала маме о том, как мне было тяжело в детстве. О том, как мне не хватало любви и внимания. И при этом — что я ни в чём её не виню и бла…
🔥5❤2
Финансы в гармонии|Анна Русакова pinned a photo
График мероприятий на август 11 августа 16.00 Прямой эфир с риелтором «Как оценить инвестиционный потенциал квартиры на вторичке» 16 августа 14.00 Камерная баня с дегустацией элитного китайского чая 19 августа 16.00 Третья из серии парусных гонок «Лиги лидеров» 22 августа Бизнес экскурсия на инвестиционные объекты Время уточняется 26 августа 19.00 Финансовая игра Запись на мероприятия в личные сообщения
🔥2👍1
Доброе утро! #цитатанедели
❤🔥5
Какой день удобнее всего для экскурсии
- Будний день, днём (например, вторник-среда, 14:00–18:00)0%
- Будний день, вечером (вторник-среда, 18:00–22:00)43%
- Выходной, днём (суббота или воскресенье, 12:00–16:00)29%
- Выходной, вечером (суббота или воскресенье, 16:00–20:00)29%
- Мне всё равно, подстроюсь под большинство29%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Друзья, спасибо за голосование! Похоже, бизнес-экскурсия на инвестиционные объекты набрала больше всего откликов 🎶 Чтобы я могла всё организовать максимально удобно для вас, нужна ваша помощь с таймингом. Выберите, пожалуйста, какой вариант вам подходит больше) Голосуйте в опросе 👇 Если у вас есть особые пожелания по дню недели или времени — пишите в комментариях. Постараюсь учесть все.
Запись прямого эфира с финансовым советником Анной Русаковой на тему: "Хочу квартиру, но не могу накопить на первый взнос" Приятного просмотра 🤗 Будем рады вашим лайкам🔥
❤6
Кажется, что накопить на первый взнос невозможно? Зарплата приходит... и незаметно уходит на кафе, маркетплейсы, поездки и другие приятные мелочи. А квартира так и остается где-то в категории «когда-нибудь потом» 😅 📅 28 июля в 16:00 я буду в гостях у Дениса на его канале в Запрещенной сети Поговорим о том, почему многим так сложно начать копить на первый взнос и что с этим делать. Разберем: 👉 почему мозг саботируе…
❤6
Доброе утро! Не бойся ошибиться. Любое открытие проходило через множество проб и ошибок. Классический пример – Эдисон, у которого сгорели тысячи лампочек, прежде чем одна из них дала свет #цитатанедели
❤2❤🔥1
На какую тему сделать эфир?
- Какие риски на вторичке реально закрыть документами, а какие нет54%
- Кто должен вести сделку , или можно справиться самому ?31%
- Подводные камни сделок по доверенности31%
- Как оценить инвестиционный потенциал квартиры на вторичке54%
The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @annushka_just. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой день удобнее всего для экскурсии
- Будний день, днём (например, вторник-среда, 14:00–18:00)0%
- Будний день, вечером (вторник-среда, 18:00–22:00)43%
- Выходной, днём (суббота или воскресенье, 12:00–16:00)29%
- Выходной, вечером (суббота или воскресенье, 16:00–20:00)29%
- Мне всё равно, подстроюсь под большинство29%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
На какую тему сделать эфир?
- Какие риски на вторичке реально закрыть документами, а какие нет54%
- Кто должен вести сделку , или можно справиться самому ?31%
- Подводные камни сделок по доверенности31%
- Как оценить инвестиционный потенциал квартиры на вторичке54%
The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Куда бы вам было интересно прийти?
- 🍵 Китайская чайная церемония — медленно, глубоко, про присутствие в моменте27%
- 🔔 Гонг-медитация — звук, вибрация, полное переключение от головы к телу47%
- 🎭 Вечер в стиле импровизации — легкость, смех, спонтанность и новые грани себя27%
- 🏗️ Бизнес-экскурсия на инвестиционные объекты — живьём увидеть, как работают деньги80%
The shares total 181%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 525,232 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Финансы в гармонии|Анна Русакова” (@annushka_just), 597 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annushka_just.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.