Diese Marken bei Gold sind jetzt wichtig! Wann kaufen? 👇👇👇 https://youtube.com/watch?v=64jPLJEGNVs
❤17🖕3👎1🗿1🤔1

Channel
@friedrichpartner
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,167subscribers
+1,400 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001298267509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @friedrichpartner |
| Description | https://www.friedrich-partner.de/ 📺 Youtube https://www.youtube.com/c/MarcFriedrich7 🐦 Twitter https://twitter.com/marcfriedrich 📸 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/marcfriedrich7 Gold & Silber kaufen (Affiliate): https://go.flexgold.com/c/0UH1E |
| Created | 20 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/friedrichpartner |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 29,167 | -36 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 29,203 | -17 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 29,220 | -19 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:42 | 29,239 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 29,245 | +11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 29,234 | -16 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 29,250 | -34 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 29,284 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:24 | 29,293 | +179 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:34 | 29,114 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 29,118 | +5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 29,113 | +24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 29,089 | +222 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 28,867 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 28,870 | +4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:11 | 28,866 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 28,864 | +33 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 28,831 | +164 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 28,667 | +569 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 28,098 | first reading |
145 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 145 (28 July 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 516,100 |
| Reactions total | 6,257 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 11:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12,821 reactions across 145 posts, in 55 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4,756 | 37.1% | |
| ❤ | 2,001 | 15.6% | |
| 🤮 | 974 | 7.60% | |
| 🔥 | 969 | 7.56% | |
| 🤣 | 804 | 6.27% | |
| 👏 | 513 | 4.00% | |
| 💯 | 479 | 3.74% | |
| 🤡 | 406 | 3.17% | |
| 🍾 | 293 | 2.29% | |
| 😢 | 257 | 2.00% | |
| 👎 | 213 | 1.66% | |
| 🤬 | 204 | 1.59% | |
| 💩 | 125 | 0.975% | |
| 🤔 | 103 | 0.803% | |
| 😱 | 74 | 0.577% | |
| 🖕 | 72 | 0.562% | |
| 😁 | 71 | 0.554% | |
| 🙏 | 63 | 0.491% | |
| 🎉 | 62 | 0.484% | |
| 🍌 | 40 | 0.312% | |
| 35 further kinds | 342 | 2.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 145 of the 145 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,821 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 145 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @friedrichpartner. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 145 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 2 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Diese Marken bei Gold sind jetzt wichtig! Wann kaufen? 👇👇👇 https://youtube.com/watch?v=64jPLJEGNVs
❤17🖕3👎1🗿1🤔1
Gold: Crash oder Chance? Diese Zeichen musst du jetzt kennen! 👉️ youtu.be/64jPLJEGNVs Gold stürzt ab, die Anleiherenditen schießen nach oben – und plötzlich geraten die Märkte unter Druck. Ist das nur eine normale Korrektur oder beginnt gerade etwas deutlich Größeres? Hält Gold die entscheidenden Unterstützungen oder droht der nächste Absturz Richtung 3.000 Dollar? Ich zeige dir, welche Signale jetzt wirklich zähle…
👍29❤9🤣2👏1🔥1🖕1
Kennst du schon meinen neuen YT Kanal mit dem Best of? „Unser System ist am Arsch!“ – Marc Friedrich über Geld, Schulden & Macht https://youtu.be/dA36NII84Gw
👍34👎5🆒4👏2🤡2🙉2
Gut so! Bitte auch die anderen Steuern - vor allem die Kryptosteuer! Hier mein Gegenvorschlag wie wir hunderte Milliarden sparen könnten und eine Flat Tax für jeden von 12% implementieren könnten https://www.focus.de/finanzen/news/der-staat-nimmt-zu-viel-und-verliert-trotzdem-milliarden_4152c8be-92d0-4e9e-9356-6f9f207f3959.html
👏75❤17🔥6🎄5👾1😨1
Wie geht’s weiter mit Gold? Welche Preismarken sind zu beachten? Und wie ich mich positioniere, heute Abend ab 19:00 Uhr auf YouTube https://youtube.com/@MarcFriedrich7
👍43👎1💩1🗿1
Immer mehr Steuern Immer mehr Bürokratie Immer mehr Beamte Hier mein Gegenvorschlag: https://www.focus.de/finanzen/news/das-raupe-nimmersatt-syndrom-von-marc-friedrich-unser-staat-frisst-sich-selbst_139a0bb2-ff6f-4bca-870f-7919c40f5de1.html
🤮95🖕14🔥8👏3❤2👍2
Hier der aktuellste Entwurf zur Abschaffung der Haltefrist bei Bitcoin und Kryptowährungen. Wenn dies so durchgeht sind Käufe ab 1.1.2027 steuerpflichtig mit Abgeltungssteuer und Solidaritätszuschlag (26,37%). Alle davor erworbenen Käufe genießen Bestandsschutz!
🤮128🖕34❤20👍1👎1😡1
Ab in den Kaninchenbau 👇 https://youtu.be/d8sP4ZS3MVU
👍28❤7🤨1
Fabian Society: Das mächtigste Netzwerk, das niemand kennt 👉 https://youtu.be/d8sP4ZS3MVU Ein Wolf im Schafspelz, ein Netzwerk bis in die Regierung und eine Geschichte voller Abgründe: Die Fabian Society hat über Generationen Politik, Universitäten und Medien geprägt. Ich zeige dir ihre Strategie, die erschreckenden Eugenikvorstellungen führender historischer Mitglieder und ihre Verbindungen zur britischen Machteli…
👍50❤10🔥9😱5👏3🤗1
Gibt es Krieg? Insider klārt auf und warnt https://youtu.be/bB4qvQ15cN0 Ja
👍29🕊15❤3🥱3🔥2
Deutschland ist im Niedergang! Im Sport wie in der Politik, gesellschaftlich und in der Wirtschaft. Go woke - go broke! Ideologie über Vernunft und dazu Hybris und spätrömische Dekadenz haben zu historischen Fehlentscheidungen geführt. Wir brauchen Demut, Lust, Leistung & Mut Was denkt ihr?
👍159💯36❤18🤪7🖕1🦄1
Steht der 3. Weltkrieg vor der Tür? Erich Vad fürchtet die Eskalation 👉 https://youtu.be/bB4qvQ15cN0 Wie groß ist die Gefahr, dass der Ukraine-Krieg zu einem europäischen Krieg eskaliert? Der ehemalige Brigadegeneral und frühere Merkel-Berater Erich Vad warnt vor einer gefährlichen Eskalationsspirale und kritisiert den außenpolitischen Kurs Deutschlands und Europas. Im Gespräch geht es um die militärische Lage in …
👍30❤19🕊6🙏3🥱2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 145 posts we hold for @friedrichpartner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Friedrich - Partner Offizieller News Kanal” (@friedrichpartner), 29,167 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/friedrichpartner.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.