Channel
@MarcFriedrichDeut
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,698subscribers
+2,668 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001456308096 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @MarcFriedrichDeut @MartinSonneborn |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 39 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MarcFriedrichDeut |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:14 | 4,698 | +4,558 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 140 | -207,162 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:19 | 207,302 | -750 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 208,052 | +203,339 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 4,713 | -203,758 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 10:36 | 208,471 | -898 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 20:37 | 209,369 | +204,636 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 11:51 | 4,733 | -207,238 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 07:21 | 211,971 | +207,174 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 4,797 | -210,895 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 215,692 | +210,769 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 4,923 | -217,308 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 222,231 | -3,518 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 225,749 | +220,788 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 4,961 | -221,057 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 226,018 | +221,051 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 4,967 | -221,314 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 226,281 | -971 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 227,252 | -1,225 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 228,477 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 38 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
25 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 72.0% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 28.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Der BTC-Chart passt sehr gut zum Wyckoff-Modell: Der Preis konsolidiert derzeit zwischen 78.000 und 80.000 US-Dollar, mit einem möglichen Ausbruch über 85.000 US-Dollar im September. Auch ETH folgt der Bewegung von BTC recht genau und könnte diesem Szenario zufolge schon bald in Richtung 3.500 US-Dollar steigen. 👼 Nvidia hat die Erwartungen erneut übertroffen: Der Umsatz lag bei 96,2 Milliarden US-Dollar, und für d…
Video, posted without a caption
⚖️ Das ändert sich ab September 2026 👉 Ab dem 27. September 2026 müssen Händler in der gesamten EU zwei einheitliche Labels verwenden, die Käufer über ihre Rechte informieren 👉 Parallel zum neuen Gewährleistungslabel greift ab dem 27. September die sogenannte EmpCo-Richtlinie, die EU-Richtlinie zur Stärkung der Verbraucher für den ökologischen Wandel 👉 Nachhaltigkeitssiegel müssen nach der EmpCo-Richtlinie strenge…
Strategy schafft es unter die Top 15 der meistgehandelten US-Aktien Die Aktie von Michael Saylors Bitcoin-Treasury-Firma Strategy (MSTR) rangiert unter den 15 meistgehandelten Werten an den US-Börsen. Rund 4,36 Millionen Anteile wechselten den Besitzer, bei einem Kurs von 136,47 US-Dollar und einem Tagesplus von 10,78 Prozent. Damit liegt Strategy vor Broadcom, Alphabet und Crowdstrike. An der Spitze steht Nvidia m…
„Größte Dollar-Woche der Geschichte – Bitcoin bleibt unbeeindruckt!" 🟠 In der Woche ab dem 16. August legte ein einzelner Bitcoin so stark zu wie nie zuvor in absoluten Dollar. Die Eckdaten: • Wert: +15.111 $ je Bitcoin – Rekord unter 839 Wochen seit 2010 • Vergleich: Bisheriger Bestwert lag bei 11.667 $ im November 2024 • Einordnung: Ein Plus von 24,1% – prozentual gab es größere Wochen 📌 Das Netzwerk merkt davon…
Was ihn WIRKLICH antreibt und über das, was Ihm persönlich wichtig ist. — Marc Friedrich https://youtu.be/5u9AaAk25cE 2:39
Merz versucht, seine „Stadtbild“-Aussage umzudeuten In einer RTL-Runde versuchte Merz seine eigene „Stadtbild“-Aussage vom Oktober 2025 zu revidieren. Eine junge Pfarrerin aus Sachsen-Anhalt sagte, dass sie „schwer schockiert“ über seine Aussagen gewesen sei, weil Menschen dadurch pauschal abgewertet würden. Dann nahm Merz eine inhaltliche Einschränkung vor, die sich so in der Originalaussage von 2025 nicht finden …
Wochenenden stoppen die Märkte nicht, und sie sollten auch deinen Fortschritt nicht stoppen. Während andere sich ausruhen, überprüfen kluge Investoren ihre Ziele, schauen auf ihre Portfolios und planen ihren nächsten Schritt. Der Unterschied zwischen denen, die Vermögen aufbauen, und denen, die davon träumen, ist einfach: Handeln. Beständiges, fokussiertes Handeln, selbst wenn es scheint, als passiere nichts. Ich h…
Nazi-Keule wegen „Sonderbehandlung“: Der Doppelstandard des „Standard“ Die Salzburger FPÖ wirbt mit dem Slogan „Keine Sonderbehandlung für Ukrainer“ und meint damit eine aus ihrer Sicht ungerechtfertigte Bevorzugung bei Sozialleistungen. „Standard“-Journalist Thomas Mayer sieht darin hingegen einen berüchtigten Nazi-Begriff, mit dem die Nationalsozialisten Mordaktionen getarnt hätten, und stellt die Frage, ob die FP…
Photo, posted without a caption
Bitcoin-Wallets, die zehn Jahre lang unangetastet geblieben waren, haben Vermögenswerte im Wert von 40 Millionen Dollar transferiert; dabei wurden Börsen größtenteils gemieden. Sechs Wallets, die seit einem Jahrzehnt inaktiv waren, bewegten diesen Monat Bitcoin im Wert von 40 Millionen Dollar. Dennoch zeigen Daten von Galaxy, dass die Aktivität bei lange ruhenden Beständen auf dem niedrigsten Stand seit 2022 liegt u…
„Bitcoin schlägt Aktien – und läuft im Gleichschritt mit Gold!" 🟠 Im August übertrifft Bitcoin nahezu jede andere Anlageklasse – und koppelt sich dabei eng an das Edelmetall. Die Eckdaten: • Wert: Bitcoin +26% im Monat – Gold +13,8%, S&P 500 nur +3,2% • Bedeutung: 30-Tage-Korrelation zu Gold bei +0,81 – ungewöhnlich eng • Trend: Zum Dollar-Index liegt die Korrelation bei -0,86 📌 Grayscale spricht von der Rückkehr …
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @MarcFriedrichDeut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Martin Sonneborn MdEP – Fraktionsloses Mitglied im Europäischen Parlament” (@MarcFriedrichDeut), 4,698 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MarcFriedrichDeut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.