Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Blocktrainer Feed

Channel

Blocktrainer Feed

@BlocktrainerFeed

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,588subscribers

+34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001380450115
TypeChannel
Username@BlocktrainerFeed
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BlocktrainerFeed

Growth

4,5494,5884,568.56 August 2026 — 4,554 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,554 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,549 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,552 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,553 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,551 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,565 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,584 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,588 subscribers6 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 21 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,543–4,594 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 18:244,588+4
25 Aug 2026, 03:574,584+19
21 Aug 2026, 19:084,565+14
18 Aug 2026, 15:024,551-2
15 Aug 2026, 20:584,553+1
12 Aug 2026, 02:064,552+3
9 Aug 2026, 10:514,549-5
6 Aug 2026, 18:484,554no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:464,554first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.9%
avg views ÷ 4,588 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,600
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held30 (30 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total48,054
Reactions total537
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

537 reactions across 30 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17232.0%
🔥6612.3%
6011.2%
🤡6011.2%
🍌315.77%
😁183.35%
🤣183.35%
😭152.79%
👌142.61%
🥴132.42%
😱91.68%
🥱91.68%
👀81.49%
71.30%
💩61.12%
🙏61.12%
🤮50.931%
😡40.745%
🎉30.559%
🖕30.559%
6 further kinds101.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 537reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC914 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Die Bitcoin-ETFs hatten nach dem Coldcard–Vorfall die beste Zuflusswoche seit April. 📊 BlackRock verkündete zugleich, dass die Schwelle für In-Kind-Transfers von 25 auf 1 Mio. $ gesenkt wurde. 👀 Das befeuerte Spekulationen über einen Inside-Job. 🧐 ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/nach-coldcard-vorfall-bitcoin-etfs-verzeichnen-zufluesse-waehrend-blackrock-btc-gegen-ibit-tauschen-laesst

🖕3😁3🤮2👍1

11 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC≈1,100 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

TMTG, die Aktiengesellschaft von Donald Trump, hat ihre Bitcoin-Reserve auf 14.139 BTC vergrößert. 🛒📈 Dies geschah, während viele wegen On-Chain-Transfers über Verkäufe spekulierten. 👀 Trotzdem kann man nicht sagen, dass TMTG den Dip kauft. 🤔 ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/trumps-aktiengesellschaft-hat-keine-bitcoin-verkauft-sondern-bestand-vergroessert

🤮3🔥2🍾1👍1💩1

10 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,220 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Das Unternehmen Strategy hat schon wieder Bitcoin verkauft. 📉 Dieses Mal flossen die Erlöse ausschließlich in $STRC-Rückkäufe. 👀 Gelingt es so, den $STRC-Kurs auf 100 US-Dollar zu bringen und somit wieder im großen Stil kaufen zu können? 🤔 ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/strategy-hat-1690-bitcoin-verkauft-um-strc-zurueckzukaufen

🍌14😁2👍1

9 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC≈1,290 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Neue Folge des Wochenrückblicks! ⚡️🎙️ Tristan bespricht die verschobene Abstimmung beim CLARITY Act, den Erfolg der Haltefrist-Petition, Strategys jüngsten Bitcoin-Verkauf, die vermeintlichen Verkäufe von TMTG u.v.m. 👀 Jetzt hören! 🧡🎧 ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/wissen/blocktrainer-podcast#1786286977

👍3

9 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC≈1,320 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Gestern Nacht hat sich die BIP-110-Kette abgespalten – und es gibt einen klaren Gewinner. 👀 Was bedeutet der Chain-Split für Bitcoin? Ist jetzt eine weitere Unsicherheit aus dem Weg geräumt? 🤔 Heute um 20:15 Uhr live auf YouTube mit Roman Reher! 🎥 👉https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MInKgMJfSNU

😁6👍42🤡2

9 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC≈1,330 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

BIP-110 resultierte gestern in einer Spaltung des Bitcoin-Netzwerks. 💥 Auf der BIP-110-Kette gab es seither nur 2 Blöcke, während es auf der richtigen Blockchain 90 waren. 👀 Doch die BIP-110-Befürworter wollen noch nicht aufgeben. 🤔 ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/bitcoin-netzwerk-spaltet-sich-bip-110-ist-gescheitert

👌11🍌10🤡42👍2

7 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,560 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Nach Coldcard und Boltz sorgt nun BTCPay-Server für die nächste Sicherheitswarnung im Bitcoin-Ökosystem. 🚨 Betreiber öffentlich erreichbarer Instanzen sollten ihre Systeme dringend aktualisieren/herunterfahren. ⚠️ Was bisher bekannt ist! ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/btcpay-server-sicherheitswarnung

🥴10🤯32👍1

7 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC≈1,480 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Vor der Augustpause des Senats wird es zu keiner Abstimmung mehr beim CLARITY Act kommen. 🇺🇸❌ Im September soll das Thema aber wieder angegangen werden. 🧐 Ein neuer Vorschlag sieht derweil vor, dass Trump bestimmte Krypto-Investments verkauft. 📉👀 ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/clarity-act-abstimmung-fuer-krypto-gesetz-verschoben

🤣11🤡6👍4

7 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC≈1,450 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ab Sonntagabend wieder verfügbar. shop.blocktrainer.de

🔥6🤣3👍1🙏1

Signed René | Blocktrainer.de

6 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,520 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Der Coldcard-Vorfall hat viele Bitcoiner dazu gebracht, ihr Self-Custody-Setup noch einmal zu überdenken. 🔐👀 Mit Multisig hätte ein einzelner kompromittierter Seed nicht zum Verlust der $BTC geführt. 🧐 Eine Schritt-für-Schritt-Anleitung! 🎓 ⬇️ https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/bitcoin-selbstverwahrung-noch-sicherer-anleitung-fuer-multisig-wallet

👍5😁1

6 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC≈1,500 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Der CLARITY Act steht vor dem Aus! 🇺🇸❌ Bitcoin zeigt sich davon aber unbeeindruckt. Dasselbe gilt für den Coldcard-Vorfall sowie den BTC-Verkauf von Strategy. 🧐 Sind das alles gute Zeichen? 🤔 Heute um 21 Uhr live auf YouTube mit Roman Reher! 🎥 👉https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1MeFlLn5yY

7👍1🔥1🤡1🙏1

5 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,630 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Jetzt auf YouTube! 🔥 Roman Reher war bei {ungeskriptet} by Ben zu Gast. 👀 👇 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DTCgjiBgV4

🔥48👍64🎉3👏1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @BlocktrainerFeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 820,969 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Blocktrainer Feed” (@BlocktrainerFeed), 4,588 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlocktrainerFeed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.