Channel
@coinsignale
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,836subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001226350529 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coinsignale |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coinsignale |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 1,836 | -10 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 1,846 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 1,847 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 1,848 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 1,845 | +5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 1,840 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 1,839 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 1,834 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 1,840 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:21 | 1,841 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 1,840 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 1,840 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
158 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 147 | 93.0% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 2.53% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.90% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 1.90% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.633% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Laut Power Law wäre der Boden erreicht. Vielleicht ist die Preisaktion der letzten möglichen bevorstehenden Kapitulation gar nicht so extrem oder nur sehr kurz. Das Modell muss auch nicht halten. Das letzte Hoch war auch nicht an der roten Linie.
👍8🤯1
Das VDD zeigt immer einen Anstieg am Bärenmarktboden. Zurzeit steigt das VDD an. Steht der Bärenmarktboden also bald bevor? Das VDD misst die Umlaufgeschwindigkeit mit hoher Gewichtung für Coins, die lange Zeit nicht bewegt wurden. Am Bärenmarktboden könnten also Hardliner kapitulieren und dann quasi die "letzten" Verkäufer sein, bis der Markt seine Bereinigung erreicht hat.
👍8❤1
Bitcoin ist noch nicht unter seinem Realized Price gefallen. Der MVRV Z-Score damit noch nicht im "grünen Bereich", wie sonst immer am Bärenmarktboden. Das ist noch ein Indiz, dass der Boden noch nicht drin ist.
👍8😱3🔥1
BTC Schwierigkeit ist erstmals in einem längeren Abwärtstrend. Miner kündigen an noch stärker Richtung KI Datencenter zu gehen. Deshalb ist davon auszugehen, dass der Trend noch eine Weile anhält.
👍5
#ETHBTC ist wie angekündigt aus dem bullischen Keil ausgebrochen: https://www.tradingview.com/x/PKco3G5c/
👍3
In USD durchbricht der Kurs momentan die 200 Weekly SMA: https://www.tradingview.com/x/9oFtgHer/
👍2
BTCEUR prallt von 200 Weekly SMA ab https://www.tradingview.com/x/pxIG1YTw/ Bärenmarkt setzt sich fort?
👍2
Wenn Bitcoin die Preismarke von 65000 USD nicht noch diese Woche zurück gewinnt, sieht es im Wochenchart technisch nach einem Ausbruch unter die Unterstützung mit sauberen Pullback aus: https://www.tradingview.com/x/ROe2ukoT/
👍8❤1
Puell Multiple ist nun auf den zweit niedrigsten Wert jemals gefallen. Aus meiner Sicht neigt sich der Bärenmarkt nun langsam seinem Ende hin. Das passt gut zum 4-Jahreszyklus, der den Boden irgendwann Anfang Oktober voraussagt.
👍20
Puell Multiple ist tief gefallen und generiert ein mögliches langfristiges Kaufsignal
👍7
#ETHBTC sieht gut aus. Könnte evtl. bald aus dem bullischen Keil ausbrechen: https://www.tradingview.com/x/2Qy55cjH/
👍5❤2
In USD hat Bitcoin die 200-Wochen-MA zurückerobert. In EUR notiert der Kurs noch darunter. Dass der Kurs hier auch schwäche zeigt, sieht eher danach aus, dass es bald weiter runter geht oder der Boden sich zumindest noch etwas Zeit lässt. https://www.tradingview.com/x/qLkCjcVn/
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @coinsignale. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Krypto Signale” (@coinsignale), 1,836 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinsignale.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.