Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Friedemann Däblitz

@RA_Friede

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,748subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001215576205
TypeChannel
Username@RA_Friede
Created26 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RA_Friede

Growth

7,7487,7647,7566 August 2026 — 7,764 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,764 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,763 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,757 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,748 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,746–7,766 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:137,748-9
9 Aug 2026, 23:367,757-6
7 Aug 2026, 00:007,763-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:197,764no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:417,764first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 9 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 40s
Average length
3m 40s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,170 reactions across 16 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍24520.9%
😢16414.0%
13311.4%
🤬13011.1%
🔥1089.23%
💯685.81%
🤝534.53%
🤮433.68%
🤔342.91%
👏292.48%
🙏262.22%
😁211.79%
🖕181.54%
🤣141.20%
131.11%
🤨90.769%
👀80.684%
🤡80.684%
🙈70.598%
❤‍🔥60.513%
13 further kinds332.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,170reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2025 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jun 2026, 19:09 UTC≈1,830 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @multipolar_magazin

🗞 Fall Hopkins: Bundesverfassungsgericht nimmt Verfassungsbeschwerde nicht zur Entscheidung an ➠ Meldung lesen ... Berliner US-Satiriker wegen Verwendung von NS-Kennzeichen verurteilt / Anwalt: Verletzung von Meinungs- und Kunstfreiheit / Bundesverfassungsgericht will sich nicht zu Vorwürfen der Willkür und der politischen Instrumentalisierung äußern alle bisherigen Beiträge: Meldungen, Artikel, tägliche Hinweise,

👍11🤬11🤨1

16 Jun 2026, 20:32 UTC≈1,990 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @barucker

Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat die Verfassungsbeschwerde des politischen Satirikers CJ Hopkins ohne Begründung abgelehnt. Ich habe dazu den Anwalt des Beschwerdeführers, Friedemann Däblitz, sowie die mit dem Fall vertraute Richterin Clivia von Dewitz befragt. Der Sachverhalt bleibt höchst befremdlich und wirft kein gutes Licht auf den deutschen Rechtsstaat. Schließlich wurde ein Satiriker dafür verurteilt, dass er

🔥25👍98

11 Jun 2026, 12:34 UTC≈13,300 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat mir gestern mitgeteilt, dass es die Verfassungsbeschwerde meines Mandanten C. J. Hopkins gegen den Schuldspruch wegen zweier Tweets aus 2022 nicht zur Entscheidung annimmt. Durch seine Weigerung hat das Bundesverfassungsgericht m.E. seinen Willen dokumentiert, an der beobachtbar willkürlichen Rechtsanwendungspraxis zu §§ 86, 86a StGB grundsätzlich nichts zu ändern. Eine weitere Verf

🙏207🤨7🙈73😢3👍2🔥1

1 May 2026, 14:51 UTC≈19,300 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Wenn Verschwörungstheorien wahr werden 😇 #Chemtrails #Mayday in Berlin (X🔗) @RA_Friede

👍24🤣9👀8🔥5🤯2🦄2🌚1👎1

28 Jan 2026, 17:34 UTC≈9,270 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

• Es ist egal, dass „der Altersmedian der überhaupt im Zusammenhang mit SARS-CoV-2 Verstorbenen laut RKI bei 83 Jahren lag und im Krankenhaus bei 81 Jahren - genau wie bei SARI-Erkrankungen der vorangegangenen vier Grippewellen. • (Mit-)Ursache für die im Vergleich zu den Vorjahren niedrigere Anzahl von Atemwegsinfektionen sei, dass der Großteil der Bevölkerung sich an das RKI gehalten hat. Kurz gesagt: Egal, was d

🤬66🔥14😢11🖕7👍32🍌1👎1

28 Jan 2026, 17:34 UTC≈8,190 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Corona-Aufarbeitung 2026: Am 19. Januar hat das OVG-Berlin-Brandenburg in einem Nichtzulassungsbeschluss in der Sache Michael Bründel ./. Land Berlin (OVG 1 N 63/22 VG 1 K 475/21 Berlin) entschieden, dass ein Platzverweis von „Captain Future“ im September 2021 wegen einer Erkältung rechtmäßig war. Mit diesem Beschluss hat sich das Gericht m.E. selbst gegen den Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz teilimmunisiert: • Es is

🤬32🖕73👍3👎1🔥1

28 Nov 2025, 12:35 UTC≈25,900 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Auch die Junge Freiheit hat mich zu der Hausdurchsuchung bei CJ Hopkins interviewt: https://jungefreiheit.de/debatte/interview/2025/sonst-haetten-auch-spiegel-oder-stern-bestraft-werden-muessen/ (Paywall) (X🔗) @RA_Friede

👏27👍177🔥1🤡1

26 Nov 2025, 19:08 UTC≈47,800 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Bei meinem Mandanten CJ Hopkins wurde heute morgen die Wohnung durchsucht. Vorwurf ist (erneut) ein Verwenden von verfassungswidrigen Kennzeichen. Warum ich die Durchsuchung für doppelt rechtswidrig halte, habe ich heute Abend im Kontrafunk erörtert: https://www.youtube.com/live/Himy9B4DYbA?si=XjXE59_jPHmj3V4w&t=3860 (ab 01:04:25). Wir gehen (auch) dagegen vor. (X🔗) @RA_Friede

👍42🔥14🤬9

28 Aug 2025, 19:19 UTC≈7,160 views195 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Schöner als Nachrichten. @RA_Friede

💯6856👍46❤‍🔥6👌5🙏5🦄3👏2

12 Apr 2025, 23:55 UTC≈12,500 views284 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ich verabschiede mich auf unbestimmte Zeit aus dem aktiven Social Media! Sie erreichen mich unter mail@daeblitz.law, wenn Sie rechtlichen Beistand wünschen. 🙂 Auf Twitter / X habe ich meine Posts auf Privat gestellt. Meine Follower können diese sehen. https://x.com/dablitz_f Website: https://daeblitz.law @RA_Friede

😢147🤝5337🤔24👍10😭4🤣32

12 Apr 2025, 10:07 UTC≈11,500 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://kontrafunk.radio/images/audio/sendungen/2025/04/11/20250411_Kontrafunk_aktuell_Interview_Antony_Mueller.mp3

👍32🕊51

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @RA_Friede. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 652,968 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Friedemann Däblitz” (@RA_Friede), 7,748 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RA_Friede.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.