Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Friedemann Däblitz

Channel

Friedemann Däblitz

@RA_Friede

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,559subscribers

-205 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001215576205
TypeChannel
Username@RA_Friede
DescriptionRechtsanwalt - Jenseits von Willkür- und Rechtsstaat liegt ein Ort. Dort treffen wir uns.
Created26 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/RA_Friede

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,5597,7647,661.56 August 2026 — 7,764 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,764 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,763 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,757 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,748 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,745 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,738 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,732 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,722 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,716 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,711 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,703 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,695 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,688 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,681 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,664 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,645 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,620 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,614 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,604 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,596 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,587 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,576 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,573 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,568 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,563 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,561 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,559 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 95 days, net -205. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,528–7,795 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 16:567,559-2
6 Nov 2026, 14:367,561-2
4 Nov 2026, 00:567,563-5
1 Nov 2026, 07:387,568-5
29 Oct 2026, 03:407,573-3
26 Oct 2026, 11:207,576-11
23 Oct 2026, 05:277,587-9
20 Oct 2026, 13:407,596-8
17 Oct 2026, 13:067,604-10
14 Oct 2026, 23:297,614-6
11 Oct 2026, 13:417,620-25
5 Oct 2026, 10:167,645-19
27 Sept 2026, 04:377,664-17
18 Sept 2026, 07:427,681-7
14 Sept 2026, 09:407,688-7
10 Sept 2026, 09:197,695-8
5 Sept 2026, 14:387,703-8
1 Sept 2026, 06:467,711-5
29 Aug 2026, 14:267,716-6
26 Aug 2026, 15:037,722first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 9 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
66.4%
avg views ÷ 7,559 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,020
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.538%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held22 (9 April 2025 – 6 November 2026)
Views total20,080
Reactions total108
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 16:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,410
Videos
≈632
Links
≈4,980

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 40s
Average length
3m 40s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,351 reactions across 21 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍29421.8%
😢18413.6%
🤬14510.7%
❤14110.4%
🔥1299.55%
💯685.03%
👏644.74%
🤝533.92%
🤮433.18%
🙏362.66%
🤔352.59%
😁211.55%
🖕181.33%
⚡141.04%
🤣141.04%
🤨120.888%
🙈90.666%
🤡90.666%
👀80.592%
😱80.592%
16 further kinds463.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,351 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2025 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 11:21 UTC≈5,550 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

Das Kontrafunk-Interview in der Sendung "der Rechtsstaat" zu den Fällen des CJ Hopkins ist nun abrufbar unter https://kontrafunk.radio/de/sendung-nachhoeren/lebenswelten/der-rechtsstaat/der-rechtsstaat-geltung-und-anwendung-des-rechts# (X🔗️️️️) @RA_Friede

👍18❤2🔥1

31 Oct 2026, 11:41 UTC≈2,480 views39 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Multipolar und Aya Velézquez haben erneut über die Verurteilung CJ Hopkins berichtet https://multipolar-magazin.de/meldungen/0477 und https://www.velazquez.press/p/ungleiches-recht-fur-alle. Letztere hat dankenswerterweise mit Bastian Barucker zusammen Hopkins Geldstafe und seine Verteidigungskosten über Crowdfunding neutralisiert (https://t.me/ayawasgeht/5311). Beim Kontrafunk erscheint am kommenden Freitag in der …

👍16🔥12🙏8🕊2❤1

27 Oct 2026, 07:33 UTC≈9,050 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026

„Neben dem Verfahren um die beiden Tweets läuft gegen Hopkins ein weiteres Strafverfahren im Zusammenhang mit der Verbreitung seines Buches.“ Der erste Akt ist nun beendet. Der zweite Vorgang liegt noch in Karlsruhe… https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/article/us-autor-nach-corona-tweets-verurteilt-werde-es-nicht-mehr-wagen-deutsche-behoerden-zu-kritisieren-10532530 (X🔗️️️️️️) @RA_Friede

😢17😱8🤬6❤3🌭2🙏1

20 Oct 2026, 17:24 UTC≈3,000 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026

https://cjhopkins.substack.com/p/an-invitation-to-my-sentencing-hearing (X🔗️️️️️️) @RA_Friede

👍10❤1

5 Oct 2026, 21:34 UTC≈9,300 views41 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-cj-hopkins-100526 (X🔗) @RA_Friede

👏35👍2🔥2🤡1🤩1

17 Jun 2026, 19:09 UTC≈5,020 views35 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @multipolar_magazin

🗞 Fall Hopkins: Bundesverfassungsgericht nimmt Verfassungsbeschwerde nicht zur Entscheidung an ➠ Meldung lesen ... Berliner US-Satiriker wegen Verwendung von NS-Kennzeichen verurteilt / Anwalt: Verletzung von Meinungs- und Kunstfreiheit / Bundesverfassungsgericht will sich nicht zu Vorwürfen der Willkür und der politischen Instrumentalisierung äußern alle bisherigen Beiträge: Meldungen, Artikel, tägliche Hinweise, …

🤬18👍12🤨3🤔1😢1

16 Jun 2026, 20:32 UTC≈4,380 views48 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @barucker

Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat die Verfassungsbeschwerde des politischen Satirikers CJ Hopkins ohne Begründung abgelehnt. Ich habe dazu den Anwalt des Beschwerdeführers, Friedemann Däblitz, sowie die mit dem Fall vertraute Richterin Clivia von Dewitz befragt. Der Sachverhalt bleibt höchst befremdlich und wirft kein gutes Licht auf den deutschen Rechtsstaat. Schließlich wurde ein Satiriker dafür verurteilt, dass er …

🔥29👍10⚡9

11 Jun 2026, 12:34 UTC≈14,600 views63 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat mir gestern mitgeteilt, dass es die Verfassungsbeschwerde meines Mandanten C. J. Hopkins gegen den Schuldspruch wegen zweier Tweets aus 2022 nicht zur Entscheidung annimmt. Durch seine Weigerung hat das Bundesverfassungsgericht m.E. seinen Willen dokumentiert, an der beobachtbar willkürlichen Rechtsanwendungspraxis zu §§ 86, 86a StGB grundsätzlich nichts zu ändern. Eine weitere Verf…

🙏21🙈9❤8🤨8😢5⚡3😈3👍2

1 May 2026, 14:51 UTC≈20,100 views56 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Wenn Verschwörungstheorien wahr werden 😇 #Chemtrails #Mayday in Berlin (X🔗) @RA_Friede

👍25🤣9👀8🔥6🤯2🦄2🌚1👎1

28 Jan 2026, 17:34 UTC≈9,960 views106 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

• Es ist egal, dass „der Altersmedian der überhaupt im Zusammenhang mit SARS-CoV-2 Verstorbenen laut RKI bei 83 Jahren lag und im Krankenhaus bei 81 Jahren - genau wie bei SARI-Erkrankungen der vorangegangenen vier Grippewellen. • (Mit-)Ursache für die im Vergleich zu den Vorjahren niedrigere Anzahl von Atemwegsinfektionen sei, dass der Großteil der Bevölkerung sich an das RKI gehalten hat. Kurz gesagt: Egal, was d…

🤬67🔥14😢11🖕7👍3❤2🍌1👎1

28 Jan 2026, 17:34 UTC≈8,680 views48 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Corona-Aufarbeitung 2026: Am 19. Januar hat das OVG-Berlin-Brandenburg in einem Nichtzulassungsbeschluss in der Sache Michael Bründel ./. Land Berlin (OVG 1 N 63/22 VG 1 K 475/21 Berlin) entschieden, dass ein Platzverweis von „Captain Future“ im September 2021 wegen einer Erkältung rechtmäßig war. Mit diesem Beschluss hat sich das Gericht m.E. selbst gegen den Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz teilimmunisiert: • Es is…

🤬33🖕7❤3👍3👎1🔥1

28 Nov 2025, 12:35 UTC≈26,300 views53 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Auch die Junge Freiheit hat mich zu der Hausdurchsuchung bei CJ Hopkins interviewt: https://jungefreiheit.de/debatte/interview/2025/sonst-haetten-auch-spiegel-oder-stern-bestraft-werden-muessen/ (Paywall) (X🔗) @RA_Friede

👏27👍17❤7🔥1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @RA_Friede. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tom Lausen ‼️❗️original Datenanalyst
@TomLausen · 45,155
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Multipolar Magazin
@multipolar_magazin · 22,709
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
Aya Velázquez
@ayawasgeht · 21,455
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
Clownswelt
@Clownswelt · 29,554
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
RA Ludwig - Querdenkeranwalt
@RA_Ludwig · 62,924
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
Martin Sichert Infokanal
@martinsichertinfo · 20,901
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
Friedrich - Partner Offizieller News Kanal
@friedrichpartner · 29,288
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Friedemann Däblitz” (@RA_Friede), 7,559 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RA_Friede.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.