Channel
@BestTelegramCryptoNews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
272subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001167767364 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BestTelegramCryptoNews |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BestTelegramCryptoNews |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 272 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:24 | 274 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 271 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 272 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 271 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:59 | 271 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 5 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
39 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 20 | 51.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 15.4% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 10.3% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 7.69% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 7.69% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 5.13% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2024 to 11 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bitcoin im Big Picture… Normalerweise sollte die untere Kanallinie (rot) halten. Ein kurzes unterschreiten wie in 2020, wäre kein Problem. Sollte der Kurs aber unter die rote Linie fallen UND mit einem retest bestätigen, wird es sehr ungemütlich… Mal sehen wie es sich entwickelt.
👍2😘1
Die untere Kanal Linie die rote kann er easy anlaufen. Wobei der Kurs dann bei 461 Prozent liegen würde.
💯1
Bitcoin hat perfekt meine fünf Wellenstruktur befolgt und ist nun bei 275 % angelangt.
💯2👍1
Laut Golden Ratio befinden wir uns nun im gelben Bereich. (Kaufen)! Der Kurs KANN über die nächsten Wochen/Monate bis zur unteren Linie fallen. Muss er aber nicht…
👍3❤🔥1
Update👌
👍2
Hier ein kleines Beispiel zu dem, was ich gestern geschrieben hatte. Wir befinden uns im 4 Stunden Chart. Die gelb markierten Kreise zeigen oben den steigenden Kurs an und unten das Volumen. Das Volumen ist zwar grün was positiv ist, aber es nimmt ab, während der Kurs hoch geht. Wenn man sich nicht auskennt, würde man eventuell aus FOMO einsteigen und Bitcoin kaufen, da man Angst hat etwas verpassen zu können. Jedoch…
Hier noch was wichtiges: Für eine echte Trendumkehr bei Bitcoin schaue ich nicht nur auf ein nachlassendes Volumen. Ich will sehen, dass die Verkäufer an wichtigen Unterstützungen an Schwung verlieren, dann eine starke Gegenkerze der Käufer erscheint und der Kurs anschließend weiter hoch geht. Das bedeutet also: höhere Tiefs in niedrigeren Zeitrahmen und ein steigendes Kaufvolumen und nicht einfach nur schwache Verk…
👍1
Bitcoin ist im Monatschart wieder in die EMA rein gefallen. In den letzten 2 Monaten sehen wir, das der Kerzenkörper es wieder geschafft hat, über der EMA zu schließen. Wobei der letzte Monat schon leicht darunter war. Sollte in 15 Stunden der Kerzenkörper in der EMA schließen, sehen wir so Preise, die ich euch seit Monaten gesagt habe. Ansonsten haben wir noch die Chance, wieder zu steigen. …Im Wochenchart hat sich …
👍2
Warum lassen eigentlich Market Maker den Preis von Bitcoin frei schwanken? Ich habe gelernt, dass Privatanleger aus Angst, etwas zu verpassen (FOMO), auf Kursgewinne spekulieren und mit Hebelwirkung handeln, um den Preis in die Höhe zu treiben. So müssen Market Maker kein eigenes Geld einsetzen, um den Preis zu bewegen. Ich sehe diese Rallyes immer mit geringem oder abnehmendem Handelsvolumen. Dafür gehe ich bei Tra…
👍5👌1
Wir kommen meiner 5 Wellen Korrektur vom November 25 immer näher…
❤2
Im Oktober habe ich euch gezeigt, wie sich der Markt ungefähr nach so einem Anstieg verhält. Nichts geht ohne Korrekturen hoch. Egal ob Aktien oder auch Bitcoin. Der Kurs sucht nach ECHTER Liquidität. Liquidität ist ein sehr wichtiger Treibstoff im Markt. Es ist notwendig, damit größere Marktteilnehmer Positionen aufbauen oder abbauen können. Häufig muss der Markt dafür zuerst in liquiditätsreiche Zonen laufen. Erst …
👍4
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @BestTelegramCryptoNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“₿est ₿itcoin News®” (@BestTelegramCryptoNews), 272 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BestTelegramCryptoNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.