#西港快讯:OB5“Bs小区”,还是昨天那个位置,今天又有大批警察和警车赶到现场,估计是来抓打野团队的,附近的兄弟注意! 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料:@feihang

Channel
迪拜新闻头条
@hyxw6
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
83,736subscribers
+49,936 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002175815388 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hyxw6 |
| Description | ✅迪拜新闻头条,疑难杂症来问我 ✅本频道只负责相关发布信息,真假自行甄别! ✅为全球华人分享迪拜文化,一起看最美的迪拜! 投稿、合作: @feihang |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hyxw6 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 83,736 | -28 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:02 | 83,764 | -8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 83,772 | -15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:15 | 83,787 | -41 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 83,828 | -26 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 83,854 | +182 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 83,672 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:27 | 83,684 | -37 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:12 | 83,721 | -20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 83,741 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 83,751 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 83,767 | -21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 83,788 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 83,797 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 83,800 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 83,812 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 83,825 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 83,842 | -28 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 83,870 | -20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 83,890 | first reading |
Engagement
1,418 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.693%
- avg views ÷ 83,736 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 580
- 808 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.228%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 808
- of 1,418 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 808 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,418 (8 August 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 468,753 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈45,300
- Videos
- ≈8,390
- Links
- ≈33,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 07m
- Average length
- 44s
Measured directly from 257 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
蒙多基里省联合突查边境场所 严打非法网赌与违法博彩 近日,蒙多基里省政府联合执法部门对边境3处场所展开专项检查,要求其立即停止一切未经许可的非法网络赌博活动。 其中1处已被核实停业逾3个月,1处锁门无人,另1处正接受重点监控。该省副省长强调,未获商业博彩管理委员会(CGMC)许可的企业须立即关停。 截至2026年9月,柬全国已有18家涉及电诈的赌场被吊销许可证、9家被暂停执照接受调查,边境博彩监管正全面升级。 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料:@feihang
还以为真的是男的不行了 看到160就明白了 #群友投稿 #bbw #坦克 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料:@feihang
柬埔寨前副省长伙同翻译骗中国投资者120万刀,翻译上诉求减刑 9月28日,金边上诉法院审理一起特大投资诈骗案。45岁中文翻译孟萨伦因涉骗中国投资者120万美元,被判5年监禁,现上诉请求减刑。 同案主谋包括磅士卑省前副省长邓武迪及前军官海夫孔。案情显示,三人以帮拜林省锡矿项目办证为由,收取中方资金却提供伪造文件。此前判决中,邓、海二人须服满刑期,孟获部分缓刑实服刑3年,三人需赔偿受害者共160万美元。 庭审中,孟萨伦辩称自己仅充当沟通桥梁,未参与造假,且资产被误扣,求减半刑期并免罚。检方则嫌其量刑过轻,要求恢复5年完整刑期。案件将于10月22日宣判。 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料:@feihang
这就是你们平时爱看的 女主播 私下的样子 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料:@feihang
2000年和2026年 父子两代总理视察水灾 洪森发帖说:虎父无犬子! 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料:@feihang
#群友吐槽 金三角特区特区现在就是个现实版的杀猪盘啊 动不动就检查抓人,我们团队治安局找了关系交了保护费的都照抓不误,被抓进去出来一个人就是5万人民币一个,不抓就要移交给老挝警察, 移交给老挝警察反而还便宜,3000U 就可以出来 他妈的,现在特区就是现实版杀猪盘,你以为这个地方安全和稳定,其实都是养猪,轮着杀,今天没钱了抓一批这个团队,明天没钱了 又换着抓另外一个团队要保护费 最后我劝大家,赚到钱了,回特区吃喝玩乐消费下是没问题,想在这里搞业绩做团队是一点都不适合了 😂😂😂 营收创新高! 有没有人知道真的假的? 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料:@feihang
#群友投稿:乐鑫集团阿乐返场:兄弟当表弟,员工当商品,如今众叛亲离,人人喊打 兄弟们,依旧是老牌英雄强势回归。曾经臭名昭著的波贝乐鑫集团老板“阿乐”,限时返场。自诩产业遍布波贝,关系手眼通天,恨不得把大事件当朋友圈发的“波贝王”,如今终于落得这般境地。 应曾经在乐鑫集团遭受非人虐待的众多推推要求,也结合个人的亲身经历,今天就来说说:所谓的“波贝王”,为何会走到众叛亲离这一步。是你一手造就了这最后的结局,你应该感到开心才对。可为什么,你脸上已经很久没出现笑容了? 阿乐,江西吉安人,原名宋斌,最显著的特征是右手小臂残缺。从2024年开始,他便在东南亚大事件被频繁曝光,直至今日。从骗招、抢劫其他园区,到买卖人口、绑架勒索,再到建立园区、组织电诈,他手里是一条完整的血腥产业链。 漠视他人生命,蔑视龙国警方。园区内体罚、电棍日日不断,以至于在众多推推心中,体罚反而成了最幸福的惩罚。今天被打、过两天消失的例子,后来大家竟也觉得稀松平…
看来之前的富人查税风波是真的了,彭博今天发了篇信息量巨大的专题。 里面写道了不少,本轮针对富人的税务追查案例,力度空前。甚至海底捞的联创也被查了,其中香港是这轮征税的重点目标之一,还提到了后续即将可能到来的遗产税。 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料:@feihang
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🤩NO钱包担保3亿U|可查验! 😀 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 📱官方频道:@DF78 ➡️关注领VIP 🔝大品牌,实力派:78.COM 本身就是最好的辨识度。 ✅️香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍,封顶赔率! 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩连码四中四🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 💥新人超会赢,精彩时刻分享: 🥇六合彩 玩家用7个号码组合下注连码三全中(35注)➕四全中(35注),每注100U,结果开出4个号码。命中4注878倍及一注10000倍大奖,稳稳落袋135万U; 🥈PG电子 8月17号,壹玩家游戏中爆出200万U大奖,本金仅用2万U; 🥉DB真人 玩百家乐的老板,第一天存款50万U,连续7天每日提款5…
#网友投稿 #给前男友的一封信 林嘉旭,我想了很久,还是想认认真真跟你说一句对不起。当初和你在一起三年多,你把所有的钱都交给我,洗衣服、打扫卫生,所有琐事你都默默扛下来,毫无保留地对我好 可那个时候,身边很多人不停跟我说你不好、说你差劲,加上家人的想法,我被这些声音困住了,分不清别人口中的你,和真实的你。是我糊涂,没有站在你这边,是我逼着你分开,逼着你离开。 后来我从你兄弟口中听说,分开之后你天天喝酒,甚至伤害自己,那时候我还是固执地以为,分开是解脱。等到所有人说你的都停止了,我才慢慢醒悟。旁人说的都不算数,实实在在陪在我身边、一心一意疼我的人,一直都是你。 我才明白,原本可以陪我过完一辈子的人,被我弄丢了,我常常在想,如果当初我坚定一点,选择站在你这边,结局会不会不一样,我知道我伤你很深,我不奢求你马上原谅我,更不敢强求我们立刻回到从前。只是想让你知道,我终于看清了,是我错得离谱 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 …
#泰国新闻:洪灾已致23人死亡,曼谷4人遇难,经济损失或达7亿美元 泰国政府9月29日表示,自9月中旬以来,全国洪灾已造成23人死亡,其中曼谷有4人遇难。 泰国防灾减灾厅(DDPM)称,洪灾已影响曼谷约70万人。目前部分地区仍在积水,学校已连续第2天停课,近7000人暂时住在全市230个避难中心。 洪灾目前已波及泰国77个府中的29个府。其中,曼谷4人死亡,北榄府(Samut Prakan)8人死亡,沙缴府(Sa Kaeo)6人死亡,其余死者来自尖竹汶府、艾尤塔亚府和北标府等地。 泰国经济专家估计,此次洪灾可能造成3亿至7亿美元以上的经济损失,其中曼谷受影响最为严重。 🔔 点击订阅华人新闻头条 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+fBZd42IBnLowYjY8 ✅ 免费投稿爆料:@feihang
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,418 posts we hold for @hyxw6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@jpz9118 · 97,799#1
@sii76 · 200,375#2
@bx666 · 467,845#3
@hyxw4 · 77,044#4
@dubai0 · 77,364#5
@Kolebule8119 · 3,816#6
@HQDSJ · 11,883#7
@jpz0123 · 50,556#8
@tx100 · 158,539#9
@dnyawtt · 51,701#10
@AQzx_1 · 175,586#11
@uae918 · 87,186#12
@dnyshijian · 9,625#13
@jianpuzhaihuarenzixun · 75,233#14
@xyxy313 · 25,760#15
@ZYWX6 · 101,169#16
@VN704 · 60,125#17
@BG_BG8 · 38,746#18
@xigang13 · 63,166#19
@JPZRD68 · 59,685#20
@bbsooo · 90,674#21
@flb608 · 104,310#22
@a0159 · 128,346#23
@bbb1b · 348,524#24
@uuuuuf · 282,422#25
@mupai77 · 4,382#26
@hrs166 · 50,473#27
@aa144 · 35,225#28
@nnccqq · 38,432#29
@bominwang18 · 4,647#30
@heicaibaog · 83,111 (as read 18 August 2026)#31
@MB104 · 74,983#32
@xgrj0 · 138,287#33
@vipoo5 · 10,198#34
@baoguangqun110 · 37,625#35
@dnyxinwen668 · 40,493#36
@kanxia · 469,444#37
@xii34 · 102,332#38
@bodu08 · 58,821#39
@BGSS8 · 1,029#40
@dny88 · 65,507#41
@mlxy458 · 58,505#42
@DNYTJL3 · 93,598#43
@quanwangbaoguangb · 148,210#44
@ton689 · 48,189#45
@ChiGua8999 · 11,870#46
@tghuarenba · 44,364#47
@DNYKX · 60,054#48
@JPZshibao888 · 76,978#49
@baoguang2022 · 148,798#50
@TGshibao · 67,390#51
@flbhuarenquan · 68,887#52
@baoguangba0 · 155,609#53
@ygxw3 · 143,918#54
@ow333 · 62,209#55
@kk4568 · 126,337#56
@GTR133 · 8,137#57
@DNY_hasj · 207,019#58
@baoguang7 · 48,022#59
@dnybgtt · 53,637#60
@SB919 · 128,290#61
@rdzx0 · 108,708#62
@jinbianyy · 27,562#63
@baoguang_bc · 39,172#64
@hyxw2 · 74,960#65
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@hyxw2 · 74,960
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 19 August 2026
@hyxw4 · 77,044
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 August 2026
@jpz9118 · 97,799
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnyxinwen668 · 40,493
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
@JPZRD68 · 59,685
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 25 August 2026
@baoguang7 · 48,022
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 24 August 2026
@jpz0123 · 50,556
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 August 2026
@VN704 · 60,125
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
@sii76 · 200,375
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 August 2026
@bbsooo · 90,674
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
@th769 · 50,106
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@xii34 · 102,332
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
@AQzx_1 · 175,586
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“迪拜新闻头条” (@hyxw6), 83,736 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hyxw6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.